The problem was caused by the following scenario:
- range optimizer picks an index IDX1 which doesn't match the ORDER BY ...
LIMIT clause.
- test_if_skip_sort_order() decides to switch to index IDX2 which matches
the ORDER BY ... LIMIT.
- it runs SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select() for the second time to produce
an quick select for IDX2.
- However, test_quick_select() would figure that full index scan on IDX1
is still cheaper (its calculations ignore the LIMIT n).
Fixed this by
- passing force_quick_range=true to test_quick_select()
- in test_quick_select, don't consider full index scans if the mentioned
parameter is true.
Numerous changes in .result files are caused by test_quick_select() being
run after "early/late NULLs filtering" feature has injected NOT NULL
condition.
- Make JOIN::const_key_parts include keyparts for which
the WHERE clause has an equality in form
"t.key_part=reference_outside_this_select"
- This allows to avoid filesort'ing in some cases (and also
avoid a difficult choice between using filesort or using an index)
update_used_tables for the the where condition to update cached
indicators of constant subexpressions. It should be done before further
possible simplification of the where condition.
This change caused simplification of the executed where conditions
in many test cases.
- MDEV-5587 Server crashes in Locked_tables_list::restore_lock on CREATE OR REPLACE .. SELECT under LOCK
- MDEV-5586 Assertion `share->tdc.all_tables.is_empty() || remove_type != TDC_RT_REMOVE_ALL' fails in tdc_remove_table
- MDEV-5588 Strange error on CREATE OR REPLACE table over an existing view
mysql-test/r/create_or_replace.result:
Added test cases
mysql-test/r/lowercase_view.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/merge.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/multi_update.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/subselect_exists_to_in.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_mat.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_opts.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_scache.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_semijoin.result:
New error message
mysql-test/r/view.result:
New error message
mysql-test/suite/funcs_1/r/myisam_views-big.result:
New error message
mysql-test/t/create_or_replace.test:
New tests
mysql-test/t/view.test:
New error message
sql/share/errmsg-utf8.txt:
Added new error message
sql/sql_base.cc:
Updated error message
Do an automatic UNLOCK TABLES if we don't have any locked tables (safety fix)
sql/sql_db.cc:
Updated arguments
sql/sql_load.cc:
New error message
sql/sql_parse.cc:
Check that we are not using a table we are dropping and re-creating
sql/sql_table.cc:
Added parameter to mysql_rm_table_no_locks() to not automaticly do UNLOCK TABLES
Added better error message if trying to drop a view with DROP TABLE
Don't try to create something we select from
sql/sql_table.h:
Updated prototypes
Analysis:
st_select_lex_unit::prepare() computes can_skip_order_by as TRUE.
As a result join->prepare() gets called with order == NULL, and
doesn't do name resolution for the inner ORDER clause. Due to this
the prepare phase doesn't detect that the query references non-exiting
function and field.
Later join->optimize() calls update_used_tables() for a non-resolved
Item_field, which understandably has no Field object. This call results
in a crash.
Solution:
Resolve unnecessary ORDER BY clauses to detect if they reference non-exising
objects. Then remove such clauses from the JOIN object.
The patch to fix mdev-4418 turned out to be incorrect.
At the substitution of single row tables in make_join_statistics()
the used multiple equalities may change and references to the new multiple
equalities must be updated. The function remove_eq_conds() takes care of it and
it should be called right after the substitution of single row tables.
Calling it after the call of make_join_statistics was a mistake.
After single row substitutions there might appear new equalities.
They should be properly propagated to all AND/OR levels the WHERE
condition. It's done now with an additional call of remove_eq_conds().
includes:
* remove some remnants of "Bug#14521864: MYSQL 5.1 TO 5.5 BUGS PARTITIONING"
* introduce LOCK_share, now LOCK_ha_data is strictly for engines
* rea_create_table() always creates .par file (even in "frm-only" mode)
* fix a 5.6 bug, temp file leak on dummy ALTER TABLE
Analysis:
The reason for the inefficent plan was that Item_subselect::is_expensive()
didn't detect the special case when a subquery was optimized, but had no
join plan because it either has no table, or its tables have been optimized
away, or the optimizer detected that the result set is empty.
Solution:
Identify the special cases above in the Item_subselect::is_expensive(),
and consider such degenerate subqueries inexpensive.
The wrong result set returned by the left join query from
the bug test case happened due to several inconsistencies
and bugs of the legacy mysql code.
The bug test case uses an execution plan that employs a scan
of a materialized IN subquery from the WHERE condition.
When materializing such an IN- subquery the optimizer injects
additional equalities into the WHERE clause. These equalities
express the constraints imposed by the subquery predicate.
The injected equality of the query in the test case happens
to belong to the same equality class, and a new equality
imposing a condition on the rows of the materialized subquery
is inferred from this class. Simultaneously the multiple
equality is added to the ON expression of the LEFT JOIN
used in the main query.
The inferred equality of the form f1=f2 is taken into account
when optimizing the scan of the rows the temporary table
that is the result of the subquery materialization: only the
values of the field f1 are read from the table into the record
buffer. Meanwhile the inferred equality is removed from the
WHERE conditions altogether as a constraint on the fields
of the temporary table that has been used when filling this table.
This equality is supposed to be removed from the ON expression
when the multiple equalities of the ON expression are converted
into an optimal set of equality predicates. It supposed to be
removed from the ON expression as an equality inferred from only
equalities of the WHERE condition. Yet, it did not happened
due to the following bug in the code.
Erroneously the code tried to build multiple equality for ON
expression twice: the first time, when it called optimize_cond()
for the WHERE condition, the second time, when it called
this function for the HAVING condition. When executing
optimize_con() for the WHERE condition a reference
to the multiple equality of the WHERE condition is set
in the multiple equality of the ON expression. This reference
would allow later to convert multiple equalities of the
ON expression into equality predicates. However the
the second call of build_equal_items() for the ON expression
that happened when optimize_cond() was called for the
HAVING condition reset this reference to NULL.
This bug fix blocks calling build_equal_items() for ON
expressions for the second time. In general, it will be
beneficial for many queries as it removes from ON
expressions any equalities that are to be checked for the
WHERE condition.
The patch also fixes two bugs in the list manipulation
operations and a bug in the function
substitute_for_best_equal_field() that resulted
in passing wrong reference to the multiple equalities
of where conditions when processing multiple
equalities of ON expressions.
The code of substitute_for_best_equal_field() and
the code the helper function eliminate_item_equal()
were also streamlined and cleaned up.
Now the conversion of the multiple equalities into
an optimal set of equality predicates first produces
the sequence of the all equalities processing multiple
equalities one by one, and, only after this, it inserts
the equalities at the beginning of the other conditions.
The multiple changes in the output of EXPLAIN
EXTENDED are mainly the result of this streamlining,
but in some cases is the result of the removal of
unneeded equalities from ON expressions. In
some test cases this removal were reflected in the
output of EXPLAIN resulted in disappearance of
“Using where” in some rows of the execution plans.
instead of single_select_engine
This task changes the IN-EXISTS rewrite for multi-column subqueries
"(a, b) IN (select b, c ...)" to work in the same way as for
single-column subqueries "a IN (select b ...) with respect to the
injection of NULL-rejecting predicates.
More specifically, the method
Item_in_subselect::create_row_in_to_exists_cond()
adds Item_is_not_null_test and Item_func_trig_cond only if the left
IN operand can be NULL. Not having these predicates when not necessary,
makes it possible to rewrite the subquery into a "unique_subquery" or
"index_subquery" when there is a suitable index on the only
subquery table.
Fix by Sergey Petrunia.
This patch only prevents the evaluation of expensive subqueries during optimization.
The crash reported in this bug has been fixed by some other patch.
The fix is to call value->is_null() only when !value->is_expensive(), because is_null()
may trigger evaluation of the Item, which in turn triggers subquery evaluation if the
Item is a subquery.
The problem was that was_null and null_value variables was reset in each reexecution of IN subquery, but engine rerun only for non-constant subqueries.
Fixed checking constant in Item_equal sort.
Fix constant reporting in Item_subselect.
The fix backports from MWL#182: Explain running statements the logic that
saves the original JOIN_TAB array of a query plan after optimization. This
array is later used during EXPLAIN to iterate over the original JOIN plan
nodes in the cases when this plan could be changed by early subquery
execution during the optimization phase of the outer query.
Analysis:
The fix for bug lp:985667 implements the method Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result()
for all main kinds of subqueries. The purpose of this method is to be called from
return_zero_rows() and set Items to some default value in the case when a query
returns no rows. Aggregates and subqueries require special treatment in this case.
Every implementation of Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result() called
Item_subselect::make_const() to set the subquery predicate to its default value
irrespective of where the predicate was located in the query. Once the predicate
was set to a constant it was never executed.
At the same time, the JOIN object of the fake select for UNIONs (the one used for
the final result of the UNION), was set after all subqueries in the union were
executed. Since we set the subquery as constant, it was never executed, and the
corresponding JOIN was never created.
In order to decide whether the result of NOT IN is NULL or FALSE, Item_in_optimizer
needs to check if the subquery result was empty or not. This is where we got the
crash, because subselect_union_engine::no_rows() checks for
unit->fake_select_lex->join->send_records, and the join object was NULL.
Solution:
If a subquery is in the HAVING clause it must be evaluated in order to know its
result, so that we can properly filter the result records. Once subqueries in the
HAVING clause are executed even in the case of no result rows, this specific
crash will be solved, because the UNION will be executed, and its JOIN will be
constructed. Therefore the fix for this crash is to narrow the fix for lp:985667,
and to apply Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result() only when the subquery predicate
is in the SELECT clause.
