Removed wrong fix for the bug#27006.
The bug was added by the fix for the bug#19978 and fixed by Monty on 2007/02/21.
trigger.test, trigger.result:
Corrected test case for the bug#27006.
UPDATE if the row wasn't actually changed.
This bug was caused by fix for bug#19978. It causes AFTER UPDATE triggers
not firing if a row wasn't actually changed by the update part of the
INSERT .. ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE.
Now triggers are always fired if a row is touched by the INSERT ... ON
DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE.
INSERT uses query_id to verify what fields are
mentioned in the fields list of the INSERT command.
However the check for that is made after the
ON DUPLICATE KEY is processed. This causes all
the fields mentioned in ON DUPLICATE KEY to be
considered as mentioned in the fields list of
INSERT.
Moved the check up, right after processing the
fields list.
touched but not actually changed.
The LAST_INSERT_ID() is reset to 0 if no rows were inserted or changed.
This is the case when an INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE updates a row
with the same values as the row contains.
Now the LAST_INSERT_ID() values is reset to 0 only if there were no rows
successfully inserted or touched.
The new 'touched' field is added to the COPY_INFO structure. It holds the
number of rows that were touched no matter whether they were actually
changed or not.
TABLE ... WRITE".
Memory and CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table
lock was serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was
killed (note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled).
One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which
provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically
killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through
different thread/connection.
The problem also occured when one killed particular query in connection
(using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for some table
lock.
This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort
variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should
be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill
operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the
following statements or even other connections (which reused the same
physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed
flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging.
This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member.
There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test
for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
TABLE ... WRITE".
CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table lock was
serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was killed
(note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled).
One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which
provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically
killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through
different thread/connection.
In 5.* versions memory hogging was added to CPU hogging. Moreover in
those versions the problem also occured when one killed particular query
in connection (using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for
some table lock.
This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort
variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should
be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill
operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the
following statements or even other connections (which reused the same
physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed
flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging.
This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member.
There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test
for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
