Bug#42546 Backup: RESTORE fails, thinking it finds an existing table
The problem occured when a MDL locking conflict happened for a non-existent
table between a CREATE and a INSERT statement. The code for CREATE
interpreted this lock conflict to mean that the table existed,
which meant that the statement failed when it should not have.
The problem could occur for CREATE TABLE, CREATE TABLE LIKE and
ALTER TABLE RENAME.
This patch fixes the problem for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
It is based on code backported from the mysql-6.1-fk tree written
by Dmitry Lenev. CREATE now uses normal open_and_lock_tables() code
to acquire exclusive locks. This means that for the test case in the bug
description, CREATE will wait until INSERT completes so that it can
get the exclusive lock. This resolves the reported bug.
The patch also prohibits CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE under
LOCK TABLES. Note that this is an incompatible change and must
be reflected in the documentation. Affected test cases have been
updated.
mdl_sync.test contains tests for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
Fixing the issue for ALTER TABLE RENAME is beyond the scope of this
patch. ALTER TABLE cannot be prohibited from working under LOCK TABLES
as this could seriously impact customers and a proper fix would require
a significant rewrite.
An assert in reload_acl_and_cache didn't account for the
case when the function is called with a NULL thd. A
null thd is used whenever the function is called from the
SIGHUP signal handler.
Backported from 6.0-codebase (revid: 2617.69.35)
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.25
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg-pre2-2
timestamp: Wed 2009-09-16 18:26:50 +0400
message:
Follow-up for one of pre-requisite patches for fixing bug #30977
"Concurrent statement using stored function and DROP FUNCTION
breaks SBR".
Made enum_mdl_namespace enum part of MDL_key class and removed MDL_
prefix from the names of enum members. In order to do the latter
changed name of PROCEDURE symbol to PROCEDURE_SYM (otherwise macro
which was automatically generated for this symbol conflicted with
MDL_key::PROCEDURE enum member).
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.24
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg-pre2-2
timestamp: Wed 2009-09-16 17:25:29 +0400
message:
Pre-requisite patch for fixing bug #30977 "Concurrent statement
using stored function and DROP FUNCTION breaks SBR".
Added MDL_request for stored routine as member to Sroutine_hash_entry
in order to be able perform metadata locking for stored routines in
future (Sroutine_hash_entry is an equivalent of TABLE_LIST class for
stored routines).
(WL#4284, follow up fixes).
revno: 2617.68.23
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg-pre1
timestamp: Wed 2009-09-16 09:34:42 +0400
message:
Pre-requisite patch for fixing bug #30977 "Concurrent statement
using stored function and DROP FUNCTION breaks SBR".
CREATE TABLE SELECT statements take exclusive metadata lock on table
being created. Invariant of metadata locking subsystem states that
such lock should be taken before taking any kind of shared locks.
Once metadata locks on stored routines are introduced statements like
"CREATE TABLE ... SELECT f1()" will break this invariant by taking
shared locks on routines before exclusive lock on target table.
To avoid this, open_tables() is reworked to process tables which are
directly used by the statement before stored routines are processed.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.10
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg46673
timestamp: Tue 2009-09-01 19:57:05 +0400
message:
Fix for bug #46673 "Deadlock between FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and DML".
Deadlocks occured when one concurrently executed transactions with
several statements modifying data and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK
statement or SET READ_ONLY=1 statement.
These deadlocks were introduced by the patch for WL 4284: "Transactional
DDL locking"/Bug 989: "If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction,
wrong binlog order" which has changed FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK/SET
READ_ONLY=1 to wait for pending transactions.
What happened was that FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK blocked all further
statements changing tables by setting global_read_lock global variable
and has started waiting for all pending transactions to complete.
Then one of those transactions tried to executed DML, detected that
global_read_lock non-zero and tried to wait until global read lock will
be released (i.e. global_read_lock becomes 0), indeed, this led to a
deadlock.
Proper solution for this problem should probably involve full integration
of global read lock with metadata locking subsystem (which will allow to
implement waiting for pending transactions without blocking DML in them).
But since it requires significant changes another, short-term solution
for the problem is implemented in this patch.
Basically, this patch restores behavior of FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK/
SET READ_ONLY=1 before the patch for WL 4284/bug 989. By ensuring that
extra references to TABLE_SHARE are not stored for active metadata locks
it changes these statements not to wait for pending transactions.
As result deadlock is eliminated.
Note that this does not change the fact that active FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK lock or SET READ_ONLY=1 prevent modifications to tables as
they also block transaction commits.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.7
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg46044
timestamp: Thu 2009-08-27 10:22:17 +0400
message:
Fix for bug #46044 "MDL deadlock on LOCK TABLE + CREATE TABLE HIGH_PRIORITY
FOR UPDATE".
Deadlock occured when during execution of query to I_S we tried to open
a table or its .FRM in order to get information about it and had to wait
because we have encountered exclusive metadata lock on this table held by
a DDL operation from another connection which in its turn waited for some
resource currently owned by connection executing this I_S query.
For example, this might have happened if one under LOCK TABLES executed I_S
query targeted to particular table (which was not among locked) and also
concurrently tried to create this table using CREATE TABLE SELECT which
had to wait for one of tables locked by the first connection.
Another situation in which deadlock might have occured is when I_S query,
which was executed as part of transaction, tried to get information about
table which just has been dropped by concurrent DROP TABLES executed under
LOCK TABLES and this DROP TABLES for its completion also had to wait
transaction from the first connection.
This problem stemmed from the fact that opening of tables/.FRMs for I_S
filling is happening outside of connection's main MDL_context so code
which tries to detect deadlocks due to conflicting metadata locks doesn't
work in this case. Indeed, this led to deadlocks when during I_S filling
we tried to wait for conflicting metadata lock to go away, while its owner
was waiting for some resource held by connection executing I_S query.
This patch solves this problem by avoiding waiting in such situation.
Instead we skip this table and produce warning that information about
it was omitted from I_S due to concurrent DDL operation. We still wait
for conflicting metadata lock to go away when it is known that deadlock
is not possible (i.e. when connection executing I_S query does not hold
any metadata or table-level locks).
Basically, we apply our standard deadlock avoidance technique for metadata
locks to the process of filling of I_S tables but replace ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
error with a warning.
Note that this change is supposed to be safe for 'mysqldump' since the
only its mode which is affected by this change is --single-transaction mode
is not safe in the presence of concurrent DDL anyway (and this fact is
documented). Other modes are unaffected because they either use
SHOW TABLES/SELECT * FROM I_S.TABLE_NAMES which do not take any metadata
locks in the process of I_S table filling and thus cannot skip tables or
execute I_S queries for tables which were previously locked by LOCK TABLES
(or in the presence of global read lock) which excludes possibility of
encountering conflicting metadata lock.
Bug #42147 Concurrent DML and LOCK TABLE ... READ for InnoDB
table cause warnings in errlog
Concurrent execution of LOCK TABLES ... READ statement and DML statements
affecting the same InnoDB table on debug builds of MySQL server might lead
to "Found lock of type 6 that is write and read locked" warnings appearing
in error log.
The problem is that the table-level locking code allows a thread to acquire
TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock on a table even if there is another thread which holds
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_WRITE lock on the same table. At the same time, the locking
code assumes that that such locks are incompatible (for example, see check_locks()).
This doesn't lead to any problems other than warnings in error log for
debug builds of server since for InnoDB tables TL_READ_NO_INSERT type of
lock is only used for LOCK TABLES and for this statement InnoDB also
performs its own table-level locking.
Unfortunately, the table lock compatibility matrix cannot be updated to disallow
TL_READ_NO_INSERT when another thread holds TL_WRITE_ALLOW_WRITE without
causing starvation of LOCK TABLE READ in InnoDB under high write load.
This patch therefore contains no code changes.
The issue will be fixed later when LOCK TABLE READ has been updated
to not use table locks. This bug will therefore be marked as
"To be fixed later".
Code comment in thr_lock.c expanded to clarify the issue and a
test case based on the bug description added to innodb_mysql_lock.test.
Note that a global suppression rule has been added to both MTR v1 and v2
for the "Found lock of type 6 that is write and read locked" warning.
These suppression rules must be removed once this bug is properly fixed.
Introduce a counter for protection against global read lock on thread level.
The functions for protection against global read lock sometimes need a local
variable to signal when the protection is set, and hence need to be released.
It would be better to control this behaviour via a counter on the THD struct,
telling how many times the protection has been claimed by the current thread.
A side-effect of the fix is that if protection is claimed twice for a thread,
only a simple increment is required for the second claim, instead of a
mutex-protected increment of the global variable protect_against_global_read_lock.
---------------------------------------------
This is a patch for bug#47098 assert in MDL_context::destroy on
HANDLER <damaged merge table> OPEN.
The assert occurs in MDL_context::destroy when the connection is terminated,
because all mdl_tickets have not been released.
MERGE tables do not support being opened using the HANDLER ... OPEN command,
and trying to do so will result in an error. In the event of an error, all
tables that are opened, should be closed again. The fix for bug#45781 made
sure that this also works for MERGE tables, which causes multiple tables to
be opened.
This fix extends the fix for bug#45781, by ensuring that also all locks are
released, when MERGE tables are involved.
Bug #21793 Missing CF_CHANGES_DATA and CF_STATUS_COMMAND for
handful of commands
CF_CHANGES_DATA and CF_STATUS_COMMAND flags added to the
commands mentioned in the bug description. With the following
two exceptions:
1) 4 commands do not exist:
SQLCOM_RENAME_DB
SQLCOM_LOAD_MASTER_DATA
SQLCOM_LOAD_MASTER_TABLE
SQLCOM_SHOW_COLUMN_TYPES
2) All SQLCOM_SHOW_* commands already had CF_STATUS_COMMAND,
leaving only SQLCOM_BINLOG_BASE64_EVENT.
Further, check_prepared_statement() in sql_prepare.cc has been
simplified by taking advantage of the CF_STATUS_COMMAND flag.
Note that no test case has been added.
Bug #48248 assert in MDL_ticket::upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive
The assert would happen if REPAIR TABLE was used on a table already
locked by LOCK TABLES READ. REPAIR mistakenly tried to upgrade the
read-lock to exclusive, thereby triggering the assert.
The cause of the problem was that REPAIR TABLE ignored errors
from opening and locking tables. This is by design, as REPAIR
can be used to broken tables that cannot be opened. However,
repair also ignored logical errors such as the inability to
exclusivly lock a table due to conflicting LOCK TABLES.
This patch fixes the problem by not ignoring errors from
opening and locking tables if inside LOCK TABLES mode.
In LOCK TABLES we already know that the table can be opened,
so that the failure to open must be a logical error.
Test added to repair.test.
Bug #47107 assert in notify_shared_lock on incorrect CREATE TABLE , HANDLER
Attempts to create a table (using CREATE TABLE, CREATE TABLE LIKE or
CREATE TABLE SELECT statements) which already existed and was opened
by the same connection through HANDLER statement, led to a stalled
connection (for production builds of the server) or to the server being
aborted due to an assertion failure (for debug builds of the server).
This problem was introduced by the new implementation of a metadata
locking subsystem and didn't affect earlier versions of the server.
The cause of the problem was that the HANDLER was not closed by CREATE TABLE
before CREATE tried to open and lock the table. Acquiring an exclusive MDL
lock on the table to be created would therefore fail since HANDLER
already had a shared MDL lock. This triggered an assert as the
HANDLER and CREATE statements came from the same thread (self-deadlock).
This patch resolves the issue by closing any open HANDLERs on tables
to be created by CREATE TABLE, similar to what is already done for
DROP and ALTER TABLE.
Test case added to create.test.
Bug #48725 Assert !thd->is_error() in delayed_get_table()
This bug is a regression introduced by the patch for Bug #45949.
If the handler thread for INSERT DELAYED was killed by e.g.
FLUSH TABLES, the error message is copied from the handler thread
to the connection thread. But the error was not reacted on, so the
connection thread continued as normal, leading to an eventual assert.
No test case added as it would have required sync points to work
for handler threads. The plan is to add this in the scope of
Bug #48725 / Bug #48541. The patch has been tested with the
non-deterministic test case given in the bug description.
Bug #45949 Assertion `!tables->table' in open_tables() on
ALTER + INSERT DELAYED
The assertion was caused by improperly closing tables when
INSERT DELAYED needed to reopen tables. This patch replaces
the call to close_thread_tables with close_tables_for_reopen
which fixes the problem.
The only way I was able to trigger the reopen code path and
thus the assertion, was if ALTER TABLE killed the delayed
insert thread and the delayed insert thread was able to enter
the reopen code path before it noticed that thd->killed had
been set. Note that in these cases reopen will always fail
since open_table() will check thd->killed and return. This patch
therefore adds two more thd->killed checks to minimize the
chance of entering the reopen code path without hope for success.
The patch also changes it so that if the delayed insert is killed
using KILL_CONNECTION, the error message that is copied to the
connection thread is ER_QUERY_INTERRUPTED rather than
ER_SERVER_SHUTDOWN. This means that if INSERT DELAYED fails,
the user will now see "Query execution was interrupted" rather
than the misleading "Server shutdown in progress".
No test case is supplied. This is for two reasons:
1) Unable to reproduce the error without having the delayed insert
thread in a killed state which means that reopen is futile and
was not supposed to be attempted.
2) Difficulty of using sync points in other threads than
the connection thread.
The patch has been successfully tested with the RQG and the grammar
supplied in the bug description.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.37
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg46748
timestamp: Fri 2009-08-21 18:17:02 +0400
message:
Fix for bug #46748 "Assertion in MDL_context::wait_for_locks()
on INSERT + CREATE TRIGGER".
Concurrent execution of statements involving stored functions or triggers
which were using several tables and DDL statements which affected those
tables on debug build of server might have led to assertion failures in
MDL_context::wait_for_locks(). Non-debug build was not affected.
The problem was that during back-off which happens when open_tables()
encounters conflicting metadata lock for one of the tables being open
we didn't reset MDL_request::ticket value for requests which correspond
to tables from extended prelocking set. Since these requests are part
of of list of requests to be waited for in Open_table_context this broke
assumption that ticket value for them is 0 in MDL_context::wait_for_locks()
and caused assertion failure.
This fix ensures that close_tables_for_reopen(), which performs this back-off
resets MDL_request::ticket value not only for tables directly used by the
statement but also for tables from extended prelocking set, thus satisfying
assumption described above.
Bug #47249 assert in MDL_global_lock::is_lock_type_compatible
This assert could be triggered if LOCK TABLES were used to lock
both a table and a view that used the same table. The table would have
to be first WRITE locked and then READ locked. So "LOCK TABLES v1
WRITE, t1 READ" would eventually trigger the assert, "LOCK TABLES
v1 READ, t1 WRITE" would not. The reason is that the ordering of locks
in the interal representation made a difference when executing
FLUSH TABLE on the table.
During FLUSH TABLE, a lock was upgraded to exclusive. If this lock
was of type MDL_SHARED and not MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE, an internal
counter in the MDL subsystem would get out of sync. This would happen
if the *last* mention of the table in LOCK TABLES was a READ lock.
The counter in question is the number exclusive locks (active or intention).
This is used to make sure a global metadata lock is only taken when the
counter is zero (= no conflicts). The counter is increased when a
MDL_EXCLUSIVE or MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE lock is taken, but not when
upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive() is used to upgrade directly
from MDL_SHARED to MDL_EXCLUSIVE.
This patch fixes the problem by searching for a TABLE instance locked
with MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE or MDL_EXCLUSIVE before calling
upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive(). The patch also adds an assert checking
that only MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE locks are upgraded to exclusive.
Test case added to lock_multi.test.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.32
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg46747
timestamp: Wed 2009-08-19 18:12:27 +0400
message:
Fix for bug #46747 "Crash in MDL_ticket::upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive
on TRIGGER + TEMP table".
Server crashed when one tried to drop trigger which had its subject
table shadowed by a temporary table with the same name.
This problem occured because in such situation DROP TRIGGER has opened
temporary table instead of base table on which trigger was defined.
Attempt to upgrade metadata lock on this temporary table led to crash
(we don't acquire metadata locks for temporary tables).
This fix ensures that DROP TRIGGER ignores temporary tables when
trying to open table on which trigger to be dropped is defined.
revno: 2617.69.33
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-46452
timestamp: Wed 2009-08-19 18:39:31 +0400
message:
Bug#46452 "Crash in MDL, HANDLER OPEN + TRUNCATE TABLE".
Flush open HANDLER tables before TRUNCATE, which is a DDL.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.28
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: 5.4-azalea-bugfixing
timestamp: Tue 2009-08-18 15:27:35 +0400
message:
An attempt to fix a link failure on Windows -- Sroutine_hash_entry
is forward-declared as class.
(Part of WL#4284).
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.25
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: 5.4-42546
timestamp: Fri 2009-08-14 23:52:00 +0400
message:
A cleanup in open_tables() and lock_tables():
change return type of these functions to bool from int,
to follow convention in the rest of the code.
(Part of WL#4284 review fixes).
A pre-requisite patch for Bug#30977 "Concurrent statement using
stored function and DROP FUNCTION breaks SBR".
This patch changes the MDL API by introducing a namespace for
lock keys: MDL_TABLE for tables and views and MDL_PROCEDURE
for stored procedures and functions. The latter is needed for
the fix for Bug#30977.
Bug #42074 concurrent optimize table and
alter table = Assertion failed: thd->is_error()
This assertion could occur if OPTIMIZE TABLE was started on a InnoDB table
and the table was altered to different storage engine after OPTIMIZE
had started. This allowed OPTIMIZE to pass the initial checks for
storage engine support, but fail once it reached "recreate+analyze"
if this operation was not supported by the new storage engine.
The bug had no consequences for non-debug builds of the server.
In detail, the assertion was triggered when ha_analyze() returned
HA_ADMIN_NOT_IMPLEMENTED. This led to a code path which included an
assert checking for diagnostics area contents. Since this area had
not been filled, the assertion was triggered. The diagnostics area
is in this case only used to provide more detailed information about
why optimize failed. The triggered code path sends this information
to the client and clears the diagnostic area.
This patch fixed the problem by adding an error message to the diagnostic
area if ha_analyze() fails. This error message contains the error code
returned by ha_analyze().
Test case added to innodb_mysql_sync.test.
Bug #43272 HANDLER SQL command does not work under LOCK TABLES
HANDLER commands are now explicitly disallowed in LOCK TABLES mode.
Before, HANDLER OPEN gave the misleading error message: "Table x was
not locked with LOCK TABLES". This patch changes HANDLER OPEN/READ/CLOSE
to give ER_LOCK_OR_ACTIVE_TRANSACTION "Can't execute the given command
because you have active locked tables or an active transaction" in
LOCK TABLES mode.
Test case added to lock.test.
Bug #45067 Assertion `stmt_da->is_error()' in
Delayed_insert::open_and_lock_table
The assert was triggered when delayed insert was killed by another
connection using mysql_notify_thread_having_shared_lock().
During handling of thd->killed, thd.fatal_error() was called without
a previous call to my_error() which triggered the assert.
This patch allows the assert to pass if thd->killed has been set.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.24
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: 5.4-42546
timestamp: Fri 2009-08-14 19:22:05 +0400
message:
A pre-requisite for a fix for Bug#42546 "Backup: RESTORE fails, thinking it
finds an existing table"
Back-port from WL 148 "Foreign keys" feature tree a patch
that introduced Prelocking_strategy class -- a way to parameterize
open_tables() behaviour, implemented by Dmitry Lenev.
(Part of WL#4284).
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.21
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: 5.4-4284-1-assert
timestamp: Thu 2009-08-13 20:13:55 +0400
message:
A fix and a test case for Bug#46610 "MySQL 5.4.4: MyISAM MRG engine crash
on auto-repair of child".
Also fixes Bug#42862 "Crash on failed attempt to open a children of a
merge table".
MERGE engine needs to extend the global table list
with TABLE_LIST elements for child tables,
so that they are opened and locked.
Previously these table list elements were allocated
in memory of ha_myisammrg object (MERGE engine handler).
That would lead to access to freed memory in
recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt(), which would
try to recover a MERGE table child (MyISAM table)
and use for that TABLE_LIST of that child.
But by the time recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt()
is invoked, ha_myisammrg object that owns this
TABLE_LIST may be destroyed, and thus TABLE_LIST
memory freed.
The fix is to ensure that TABLE_LIST elements
that are added to the global table list (lex->query_tables)
are always allocated in thd->mem_root, which is not
destroyed until end of execution.
If previously TABLE_LIST elements were allocated
at ha_myisammrg::open() (i.e. when the TABLE
object was created and added to the table cache),
now they are allocated in ha_myisammrg::add_chidlren_list()
(i.e. right after "open" of the merge parent in
open_tables()).
We still create a list of children names
at ha_myisammrg::open() to use as a basis
for creation of TABLE_LISTs, that allows
to avoid reading the merge handler data
file on every execution.
Bug #22876 Four-way deadlock
This bug was fixed as a part of Bug#989
"If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order"
A statement which would have caused circular wait will now
be aborted with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK.
Test case based on bug description added to innodb_mysql_lock.test.
Note that innodb_lock_wait_timeout is set to 5 mins to
prevent race conditions in the test.
Bug #39675 rename tables on innodb tables with pending
transactions causes slave data issue
Bug was already fixed as part of patch for Bug#989
(If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction,
wrong binlog order)
Test case added to rpl_innodb.test.
Bug #45066 FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK deadlocks against LOCK TABLE
Test coverage for combinations of LOCK TABLE READ / WRITE and
FLUSH TABLES / FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK added to lock.test.
LOCK and FLUSH are executed sequentially from one connection.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.20
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: 5.4-4284-1-assert
timestamp: Thu 2009-08-13 18:29:55 +0400
message:
WL#4284 "Transactional DDL locking"
A review fix.
Since WL#4284 implementation separated MDL_request and MDL_ticket,
MDL_request becamse a utility object necessary only to get a ticket.
Store it by-value in TABLE_LIST with the intent to merge
MDL_request::key with table_list->table_name and table_list->db
in future.
Change the MDL subsystem to not require MDL_requests to
stay around till close_thread_tables().
Remove the list of requests from the MDL context.
Requests for shared metadata locks acquired in open_tables()
are only used as a list in recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt(),
which calls mdl_context.wait_for_locks() for this list.
To keep such list for recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt(),
introduce a context class (Open_table_context), that collects
all requests.
A lot of minor cleanups and simplications that became possible
with this change.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.2
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: 5.4-azalea-bugfixing
timestamp: Mon 2009-08-03 19:26:04 +0400
message:
A fix and a test case for Bug#45035 "Altering table under LOCK TABLES
results in "Error 1213 Deadlock found...".
If a user had a table locked with LOCK TABLES
for READ and for WRITE in the same connection, ALTER TABLE
could fail.
Root cause analysis:
If a connection issues
LOCK TABLE t1 write, t1 a read, t1 b read;
the new LOCK TABLES code in 6.0 (part of WL 3726) will create
the following list of TABLE_LIST objects
(thd->locked_tables_list->m_locked_tables):
{"t1" "b" tl_read_no_insert}, {"t1" "a" tl_read_no_insert},
{"t1" "t1" tl_write }
Later on, when we try to ALTER table t1, mysql_alter_table()
closes all TABLE instances and releases its thr_lock locks,
keeping only an exclusive metadata lock on t1.
But when ALTER is finished, Locked_table_list::reopen_tables()
tries to restore the original list of open and locked tables.
Before this patch, it used to do so one by one:
Open t1 b, get TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock,
Open t1 a, get TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock
Open t1, try to get TL_WRITE lock, deadlock.
The cause of the deadlock is that thr_lock.c doesn't
resolve the situation when the read list only consists
of locks taken by the same thread, followed by this very
thread trying to take a WRITE lock. Indeed, since
thr_lock_multi always gets a sorted list of locks,
WRITE locks always precede READ locks in the list
to lock.
Don't try to fix thr_lock.c deficiency, keep this
code simple.
Instead, try to take all thr_lock locks at once
in ::reopen_tables().
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.65.6
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-azalea-bg39674
timestamp: Sat 2009-07-25 00:28:43 +0400
message:
Fix for bug #39674 "On shutdown mdl_destroy() called before
plugin_shutdown()".
Attempt to shutdown PBXT engine plugin led to assertion failure
caused by using already destroyed mutex in metadata locking
subsystem.
This problem stemmed from the fact that we MDL subsystem and
table definition cache were deinitialized before plugin shutdown
while PBXT plugin during its shutdown process accessed tables and
therefore expected them to be in working shape.
This patch solves this problem by moving deinitialization of
these two subsystems after plugins are shut down.
No test case is provided since such test case would require
using PBXT or other plugin which accesses tables during its
shutdown process.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.43.3
committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM>
branch nick: 40188-6.0
timestamp: Thu 2009-05-07 13:15:54 +0200
message:
Sort results as the file list of the database directory is not
sorted (MY_DONT_SORT).
(This is a follow-up fix for WL#4284).
2617.31.12, 2617.31.15, 2617.31.15, 2617.31.16, 2617.43.1
- initial changeset that introduced the fix for
Bug#989 and follow up fixes for all test suite failures
introduced in the initial changeset.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.31.1
committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM>
branch nick: 4284-6.0
timestamp: Fri 2009-03-06 19:17:00 -0300
message:
Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order
WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking
Currently the MySQL server does not keep metadata locks on
schema objects for the duration of a transaction, thus failing
to guarantee the integrity of the schema objects being used
during the transaction and to protect then from concurrent
DDL operations. This also poses a problem for replication as
a DDL operation might be replicated even thought there are
active transactions using the object being modified.
The solution is to defer the release of metadata locks until
a active transaction is either committed or rolled back. This
prevents other statements from modifying the table for the
entire duration of the transaction. This provides commitment
ordering for guaranteeing serializability across multiple
transactions.
- Incompatible change:
If MySQL's metadata locking system encounters a lock conflict,
the usual schema is to use the try and back-off technique to
avoid deadlocks -- this schema consists in releasing all locks
and trying to acquire them all in one go.
But in a transactional context this algorithm can't be utilized
as its not possible to release locks acquired during the course
of the transaction without breaking the transaction commitments.
To avoid deadlocks in this case, the ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK will be
returned if a lock conflict is encountered during a transaction.
Let's consider an example:
A transaction has two statements that modify table t1, then table
t2, and then commits. The first statement of the transaction will
acquire a shared metadata lock on table t1, and it will be kept
utill COMMIT to ensure serializability.
At the moment when the second statement attempts to acquire a
shared metadata lock on t2, a concurrent ALTER or DROP statement
might have locked t2 exclusively. The prescription of the current
locking protocol is that the acquirer of the shared lock backs off
-- gives up all his current locks and retries. This implies that
the entire multi-statement transaction has to be rolled back.
- Incompatible change:
FLUSH commands such as FLUSH PRIVILEGES and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ
LOCK won't cause locked tables to be implicitly unlocked anymore.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.23.20
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-runtime
timestamp: Wed 2009-03-04 16:31:31 +0300
message:
WL#4284 "Transactional DDL locking"
Review comments: "Objectify" the MDL API.
MDL_request and MDL_context still need manual construction and
destruction, since they are used in environment that is averse
to constructors/destructors.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.23.19
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-runtime
timestamp: Tue 2009-03-03 01:20:44 +0300
message:
Metadata locking: realign comments. No semantical changes,
only enforce a bit of the coding style.
This is a review fix for WL#4284 "Transactional DDL locking".
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.23.18
committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM>
branch nick: 4284-6.0
timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300
message:
Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order
WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking
This is a prerequisite patch:
These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted
locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to
be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can
now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock
requests, but only shared locks can be recursive.
The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into
granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime
of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of
granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the
burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and
it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks
have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction.
Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to
acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires
that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted
lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is
released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts
as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at
the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake
ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds
a equivalent of the lock being released.
These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level
design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks
in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but
this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys,
requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once.
This patch combines review input and significant code contributions
from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 3035.4.1
committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM>
branch nick: 39897-6.0
timestamp: Thu 2009-01-15 12:17:57 -0200
message:
Bug#39897: lock_multi fails in pushbuild: timeout waiting for processlist
The problem is that relying on the "Table lock" thread state in
its current position to detect that a thread is waiting on a lock
is race prone. The "Table lock" state change happens before the
thread actually tries to grab a lock on a table.
The solution is to move the "Table lock" state so that its set
only when a thread is actually going to wait for a lock. The state
change happens after the thread fails to grab the lock (because it
is owned by other thread) and proceeds to wait on a condition.
This is considered part of work related to WL#4284 "Transactional
DDL locking"
Warning: this patch contains an incompatible change.
When waiting on a lock in thr_lock.c, the server used to display "Locked"
processlist state. After this patch, the state is "Table lock".
The new state was actually intended to be display since year 2002,
when Monty added it. But up until removal of thd->locked boolean
member, this state was ignored by SHOW PROCESSLIST code.
