* rename in_subquery_conversion_threshold to in_predicate_conversion_threshold
* make it debug-only, hide from users
* change from ulong to uint - same type and range on all architectures
The patch actually fixes the old defect of the optimizer that
could not extract keys for range access from IN predicates
with row arguments.
This problem was resolved in the mysql-5.7 code. The patch
supersedes what was done there:
- it can build range access when not all components of
the first row argument are refer to the columns of the table
for which the range access is constructed.
- it can use equality predicates to build range access
to the table that is not referred to in this argument.
Fix get_quick_keys(): When building range tree from a condition
in form
keypart1=const AND (keypart2 < 0 OR keypart2>=0)
the SEL_ARG for keypart2 represents an interval (-inf, +inf).
However, the logic that sets UNIQUE_RANGE flag fails to recognize
this, and sets UNIQUE_RANGE flag if (keypart1, keypart2) covered
a unique key.
As a result, range access executor assumes the interval can have
at most one row and only reads the first row from it.
Let range optimizer remove parts of OR-clauses for which range analysis
produced SEL_TREE(IMPOSSIBLE).
There is no need to remove parts of AND-clauses: either they are inside
of OR (and the whole AND-clause will be removed), or the AND-clause is
at the top level, in which case the whole WHERE (or ON) is always FALSE
and this is a degenerate case which receives special treatment.
The removal process takes care not to produce 1-way ORs (in that case
we substitute the OR for its remaining member).
- When range optimizer cannot the lookup value into [VAR]CHAR(n) column,
it should produce:
= "Impossible range" for equality
= "no range" for non-equalities.
Port to mariadb-1.0 the following fix from mysql-5.6:
Revision ID: jorgen.loland@oracle.com-20120314131055-ml54x9deueqfsff4
BUG#13701206: WHERE A>=B DOES NOT GIVE SAME EXECUTION PLAN
AS WHERE B<=A (RANGE OPTIMIZER)
that fix didn't have a public testcase, so I created one.
This a an old legacy performance bug.
When a very selective range scan existed for the second table in a join,
and, at the same time, there was another range condition depending on the
fields of the first table, the optimizer chose a plan with
'Range checked for each record'. This plan was extremely inefficient in
comparison with the regular selective range scan.
As a matter of fact the range scan chosen for each record was the same as
that selective range scan.
Changed the test case for bug 24776 to preserve the old output for explain.
from MariaDB 10.0.
The bug in mdev-3948 was an instance of the problem fixed by Sergey's patch
in 10.0 - namely that the range optimizer could change table->[read | write]_set,
and not restore it.
revno: 3471
committer: Sergey Petrunya <psergey@askmonty.org>
branch nick: 10.0-serg-fix-imerge
timestamp: Sat 2012-11-03 12:24:36 +0400
message:
# MDEV-3817: Wrong result with index_merge+index_merge_intersection, InnoDB table, join, AND and OR conditions
Reconcile the fixes from:
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20110805143029-ywrzuz15uzgontr0
# Fix for BUG#12698916 - "JOIN QUERY GIVES WRONG RESULT AT 2ND EXEC. OR
# AFTER FLUSH TABLES [-INT VS NULL]"
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20111209150650-tzx3ldzxe1yfwji6
# Fix for BUG#12912171 - ASSERTION FAILED: QUICK->HEAD->READ_SET == SAVE_READ_SET
# and
#
and related fixes from: BUG#1006164, MDEV-376:
Now, ROR-merged QUICK_RANGE_SELECT objects make no assumptions about the values
of table->read_set and table->write_set.
Each QUICK_ROR_SELECT has (and had before) its own column bitmap, but now, all
QUICK_ROR_SELECT's functions that care: reset(), init_ror_merged_scan(), and
get_next() will set table->read_set when invoked and restore it back to what
it was before the call before they return.
This allows to avoid the mess when somebody else modifies table->read_set for
some reason.
Reconcile the fixes from:
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20110805143029-ywrzuz15uzgontr0
# Fix for BUG#12698916 - "JOIN QUERY GIVES WRONG RESULT AT 2ND EXEC. OR
# AFTER FLUSH TABLES [-INT VS NULL]"
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20111209150650-tzx3ldzxe1yfwji6
# Fix for BUG#12912171 - ASSERTION FAILED: QUICK->HEAD->READ_SET == SAVE_READ_SET
# and
#
and related fixes from: BUG#1006164, MDEV-376:
Now, ROR-merged QUICK_RANGE_SELECT objects make no assumptions about the values
of table->read_set and table->write_set.
Each QUICK_ROR_SELECT has (and had before) its own column bitmap, but now, all
QUICK_ROR_SELECT's functions that care: reset(), init_ror_merged_scan(), and
get_next() will set table->read_set when invoked and restore it back to what
it was before the call before they return.
This allows to avoid the mess when somebody else modifies table->read_set for
some reason.
BUG#13519696 - 62940: SELECT RESULTS VARY WITH VERSION AND
WITH/WITHOUT INDEX RANGE SCAN
BUG#13453382 - REGRESSION SINCE 5.1.39, RANGE OPTIMIZER WRONG
RESULTS WITH DECIMAL CONVERSION
BUG#13463488 - 63437: CHAR & BETWEEN WITH INDEX RETURNS WRONG
RESULT AFTER MYSQL 5.1.
Those are all cases where the range optimizer got it wrong
with > and >=.
mysql-test/r/range.result:
Without the code fix for DECIMAL, "select count(val) from t2 where val > 0.1155"
(which uses a range scan) returned 127 instead of 128);
Moreover, both
select * from t1 force index (primary) where a=1 and c>= 2.9;
and
select * from t1 force index (primary) where a=1 and c> 2.9;
would miss "1 1 3".
Without the code fix for strings, both
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE F1 >= 'A ';
and
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE F1 BETWEEN 'A ' AND 'AAAAA';
would miss "A A A".
sql/item.cc:
Preamble to the explanations below: opt_range.cc:get_mm_leaf() does
this (this is not changed by the patch): changes
column > value
to
column OP V
where:
* V is what is in "column" after we stored "value" in it
(such store operation may have done rounding...)
* OP is > or >=, depending on what's correct.
For example, if c is an INT column,
c > 2.9 is changed to
c OP 3
where OP is >= ('>' would not be correct).
The bugs below are cases where we chose OP wrongly.
Note that such transformations are visible in the optimizer trace.
1) Fix for STRING. In the scenario with CHAR(5) in range.test, this happens,
in get_mm_tree(), for the condition F1>='A ':
* value->save_in_field_no_warnings(field, 1) wants to store the right argument
(named 'item') into the CHAR(5) field; this stores 'A ' (the item's value)
padded with spaces (which changes nothing: still 'A ')
* we come to
case Item_func::GE_FUNC:
/* Don't use open ranges for partial key_segments */
if ((!(key_part->flag & HA_PART_KEY_SEG)) &&
(stored_field_cmp_to_item(param->thd, field, value) < 0))
tree->min_flag= NEAR_MIN;
tree->max_flag=NO_MAX_RANGE;
What this wants to do is: if the field's value is strictly smaller
than the item's, then ">=" can be changed to ">" (this is an optimization,
it can help pruning one useless partition).
* stored_field_cmp_to_item() is called; it compares the field's
and item's values: the item's value (Item_string::val_str()) is
'A ') and the field's value (Field_string::val_str()) is
'A' (yes val_str() removes end spaces unless sql_mode='PAD_CHAR_TO_FULL_LENGTH');
and the comparison is done with stringcmp() which considers
end spaces as relevant; as end spaces differ, function returns a
negative number, and ">='A '" becomes ">'A'" (i.e. the NEAR_MIN
flag is turned on).
During execution the index range scan code will search for "A", find
a match, but exclude it (because of ">"), wrongly.
The badness is the string comparison done by stored_field_cmp_to_item():
we use the reply of this function to determine where the index search
should start, so it should do comparison like index search does
comparisons; index search comparisons are ha_key_cmp() which uses
a collation-aware comparison (in our case, my_strnncollsp_simple(),
which ignores end spaces); so stored_field_cmp_to_item()
needs to do the same. When this is fixed, condition becomes
">='A '".
2) Fix for DECIMAL: just like in other comparisons in stored_field_cmp_to_item(),
we must first pass the field and then the item; otherwise expectations
on what <0 and >0 mean (inferiority, superiority) get violated.
In the test in range.test about c>2.9: c is an INT column, so 2.9
gets stored as 3, then stored_field_cmp_to_item() compares 3
and 2.9; because of the wrong order of arguments passed
to my_decimal_cmp(), range optimizer
thinks that 3 is < 2.9 and thus changes "c> 2.9" to "c> 3".
After fixing the order, it changes to the correct "c>= 3".
In the test in range.inc for val > 0.1155, it was changed to
val > 0.116, now it is changed to val >= 0.116.
BUG#13519696 - 62940: SELECT RESULTS VARY WITH VERSION AND
WITH/WITHOUT INDEX RANGE SCAN
BUG#13453382 - REGRESSION SINCE 5.1.39, RANGE OPTIMIZER WRONG
RESULTS WITH DECIMAL CONVERSION
BUG#13463488 - 63437: CHAR & BETWEEN WITH INDEX RETURNS WRONG
RESULT AFTER MYSQL 5.1.
Those are all cases where the range optimizer got it wrong
with > and >=.
of the 5.3 code line after a merge with 5.2 on 2010-10-28
in order not to allow the cost to access a joined table to be equal
to 0 ever.
Expanded data sets for many test cases to get the same execution plans
as before.
revno: 2876.47.174
revision-id: jorgen.loland@oracle.com-20110519120355-qn7eprkad9jqwu5j
parent: mayank.prasad@oracle.com-20110518143645-bdxv4udzrmqsjmhq
committer: Jorgen Loland <jorgen.loland@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-trunk-11765831
timestamp: Thu 2011-05-19 14:03:55 +0200
message:
BUG#11765831: 'RANGE ACCESS' MAY INCORRECTLY FILTER
AWAY QUALIFYING ROWS
The problem was that the ranges created when OR'ing two
conditions could be incorrect. Without the bugfix,
"I <> 6 OR (I <> 8 AND J = 5)" would create these ranges:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I < 8",
"8 <= I <= 8 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"8 < I"
While the correct ranges is
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I"
The problem occurs when key_or() ORs
(1) "NULL < I < 6, 6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5, 6 < I" with
(2) "8 < I AND 5 <= J <= 5"
The reason for the bug is that in key_or(), SEL_ARG *tmp is
used to point to the range in (1) above that is merged with
(2) while key1 points to the root of the red-black tree of
(1). When merging (1) and (2), tmp refers to the "6 < I"
part whereas the root is the "6 <= ... AND 5 <= J <= 5" part.
key_or() decides that the tmp range needs to be split into
"6 < I < 8, 8 <= I <= 8, 8 < I", in which next_key_part of the
second range should be that of tmp. However, next_key_part is
set to key1->next_key_part ("5 <= J <= 5") instead of
tmp->next_key_part (empty). Fixing this gives the correct but
not optimal ranges:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I < 8",
"8 <= I <= 8",
"8 < I"
A second problem can be seen above: key_or() may create
adjacent ranges that could be replaced with a single range.
Fixes for this is also included in the patch so that the range
above becomes correct AND optimal:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I"
Merging adjacent ranges like this gives a slightly lower cost
estimate for the range access.
A lot of small fixes and new test cases.
client/mysqlbinlog.cc:
Cast removed
client/mysqltest.cc:
Added missing DBUG_RETURN
include/my_pthread.h:
set_timespec_time_nsec() now only takes one argument
mysql-test/t/date_formats.test:
Remove --disable_ps_protocl as now also ps supports microseconds
mysys/my_uuid.c:
Changed to use my_interval_timer() instead of my_getsystime()
mysys/waiting_threads.c:
Changed to use my_hrtime()
sql/field.h:
Added bool special_const_compare() for fields that may convert values before compare (like year)
sql/field_conv.cc:
Added test to get optimal copying of identical temporal values.
sql/item.cc:
Return that item_int is equal if it's positive, even if unsigned flag is different.
Fixed Item_cache_str::save_in_field() to have identical null check as other similar functions
Added proper NULL check to Item_cache_int::save_in_field()
sql/item_cmpfunc.cc:
Don't call convert_constant_item() if there is nothing that is worth converting.
Simplified test when years should be converted
sql/item_sum.cc:
Mark cache values in Item_sum_hybrid as not constants to ensure they are not replaced by other cache values in compare_datetime()
sql/item_timefunc.cc:
Changed sec_to_time() to take a my_decimal argument to ensure we don't loose any sub seconds.
Added Item_temporal_func::get_time() (This simplifies some things)
sql/mysql_priv.h:
Added Lazy_string_decimal()
sql/mysqld.cc:
Added my_decimal constants max_seconds_for_time_type, time_second_part_factor
sql/table.cc:
Changed expr_arena to be of type CONVENTIONAL_EXECUTION to ensure that we don't loose any items that are created by fix_fields()
sql/tztime.cc:
TIME_to_gmt_sec() now sets *in_dst_time_gap in case of errors
This is needed to be able to detect if timestamp is 0
storage/maria/lockman.c:
Changed from my_getsystime() to set_timespec_time_nsec()
storage/maria/ma_loghandler.c:
Changed from my_getsystime() to my_hrtime()
storage/maria/ma_recovery.c:
Changed from my_getsystime() to mmicrosecond_interval_timer()
storage/maria/unittest/trnman-t.c:
Changed from my_getsystime() to mmicrosecond_interval_timer()
storage/xtradb/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Added support for new time,datetime and timestamp
unittest/mysys/thr_template.c:
my_getsystime() -> my_interval_timer()
unittest/mysys/waiting_threads-t.c:
my_getsystime() -> my_interval_timer()
Root cause for this bug is that the optimizer try to detect&
optimize the special case:
'<field> BETWEEN c1 AND c1' and handle this as the condition '<field> = c1'
This was implemented inside add_key_field(.. *field, *value[]...)
which assumed field to refer key Field, and value[] to refer a [low...high]
constant pair. value[0] and value[1] was then compared for equality.
In a 'normal' BETWEEN condition of the form '<field> BETWEEN val1 and val2' the
BETWEEN operation is represented with an argementlist containing the
values [<field>, val1, val2] - add_key_field() is then called with
parameters field=<field>, *value=val1.
However, if the BETWEEN predicate specified:
1) '<const1> BETWEEN<const2> AND<field>
the 'field' and 'value' arguments to add_key_field() had to be swapped.
This was implemented by trying to cheat add_key_field() to handle it like:
2) '<const1> GE<const2> AND<const1> LE<field>'
As we didn't really replace the BETWEEN operation with 'ge' and 'le',
add_key_field() still handled it as a 'BETWEEN' and compared the (swapped)
arguments<const1> and<const2> for equality. If they was equal, the
condition 1) was incorrectly 'optimized' to:
3) '<field> EQ <const1>'
This fix moves this optimization of '<field> BETWEEN c1 AND c1' into
add_key_fields() which then calls add_key_equal_fields() to collect
key equality / comparison for the key fields in the BETWEEN condition.
Root cause for this bug is that the optimizer try to detect&
optimize the special case:
'<field> BETWEEN c1 AND c1' and handle this as the condition '<field> = c1'
This was implemented inside add_key_field(.. *field, *value[]...)
which assumed field to refer key Field, and value[] to refer a [low...high]
constant pair. value[0] and value[1] was then compared for equality.
In a 'normal' BETWEEN condition of the form '<field> BETWEEN val1 and val2' the
BETWEEN operation is represented with an argementlist containing the
values [<field>, val1, val2] - add_key_field() is then called with
parameters field=<field>, *value=val1.
However, if the BETWEEN predicate specified:
1) '<const1> BETWEEN<const2> AND<field>
the 'field' and 'value' arguments to add_key_field() had to be swapped.
This was implemented by trying to cheat add_key_field() to handle it like:
2) '<const1> GE<const2> AND<const1> LE<field>'
As we didn't really replace the BETWEEN operation with 'ge' and 'le',
add_key_field() still handled it as a 'BETWEEN' and compared the (swapped)
arguments<const1> and<const2> for equality. If they was equal, the
condition 1) was incorrectly 'optimized' to:
3) '<field> EQ <const1>'
This fix moves this optimization of '<field> BETWEEN c1 AND c1' into
add_key_fields() which then calls add_key_equal_fields() to collect
key equality / comparison for the key fields in the BETWEEN condition.
Queries involving predicates of the form "const NOT BETWEEN
not_indexed_column AND indexed_column" could return wrong data
due to incorrect handling by the range optimizer.
For "c NOT BETWEEN f1 AND f2" predicates, get_mm_tree()
produces a disjunction of the SEL_ARG trees for "f1 > c" and
"f2 < c". If one of the trees is empty (i.e. one of the
arguments is not sargable) the resulting tree should be empty
as well, since the whole expression in this case is not
sargable.
The above logic is implemented in get_mm_tree() as follows. The
initial state of the resulting tree is NULL (aka empty). We
then iterate through arguments and compute the corresponding
SEL_ARG tree (either "f1 > c" or "f2 < c"). If the resulting
tree is NULL, it is simply replaced by the generated
tree. Otherwise it is replaced by a disjunction of itself and
the generated tree. The obvious flaw in this implementation is
that if the first argument is not sargable and thus produces a
NULL tree, the resulting tree will simply be replaced by the
tree for the second argument. As a result, "c NOT BETWEEN f1
AND f2" will end up as just "f2 < c".
Fixed by adding a check so that when the first argument
produces an empty tree for the NOT BETWEEN case, the loop is
aborted with an empty tree as a result. The whole idea of using
a loop for 2 arguments does not make much sense, but it was
probably used to avoid code duplication for several BETWEEN
variants.
Queries involving predicates of the form "const NOT BETWEEN
not_indexed_column AND indexed_column" could return wrong data
due to incorrect handling by the range optimizer.
For "c NOT BETWEEN f1 AND f2" predicates, get_mm_tree()
produces a disjunction of the SEL_ARG trees for "f1 > c" and
"f2 < c". If one of the trees is empty (i.e. one of the
arguments is not sargable) the resulting tree should be empty
as well, since the whole expression in this case is not
sargable.
The above logic is implemented in get_mm_tree() as follows. The
initial state of the resulting tree is NULL (aka empty). We
then iterate through arguments and compute the corresponding
SEL_ARG tree (either "f1 > c" or "f2 < c"). If the resulting
tree is NULL, it is simply replaced by the generated
tree. Otherwise it is replaced by a disjunction of itself and
the generated tree. The obvious flaw in this implementation is
that if the first argument is not sargable and thus produces a
NULL tree, the resulting tree will simply be replaced by the
tree for the second argument. As a result, "c NOT BETWEEN f1
AND f2" will end up as just "f2 < c".
Fixed by adding a check so that when the first argument
produces an empty tree for the NOT BETWEEN case, the loop is
aborted with an empty tree as a result. The whole idea of using
a loop for 2 arguments does not make much sense, but it was
probably used to avoid code duplication for several BETWEEN
variants.
feature
The test for bug no 50939 was put in range.test which isn't such a good idea
since it requires partitioning. Fixed by moving the test case to
partitioning_range.test.
feature
The test for bug no 50939 was put in range.test which isn't such a good idea
since it requires partitioning. Fixed by moving the test case to
partitioning_range.test.
remember range endpoints
The Loose Index Scan optimization keeps track of a sequence
of intervals. For the current interval it maintains the
current interval's endpoints. But the maximum endpoint was
not stored in the SQL layer; rather, it relied on the
storage engine to retain this value in-between reads. By
coincidence this holds for MyISAM and InnoDB. Not for the
partitioning engine, however.
Fixed by making the key values iterator
(QUICK_RANGE_SELECT) keep track of the current maximum endpoint.
This is also more efficient as we save a call through the
handler API in case of open-ended intervals.
The code to calculate endpoints was extracted into
separate methods in QUICK_RANGE_SELECT, and it was possible to
get rid of some code duplication as part of fix.
remember range endpoints
The Loose Index Scan optimization keeps track of a sequence
of intervals. For the current interval it maintains the
current interval's endpoints. But the maximum endpoint was
not stored in the SQL layer; rather, it relied on the
storage engine to retain this value in-between reads. By
coincidence this holds for MyISAM and InnoDB. Not for the
partitioning engine, however.
Fixed by making the key values iterator
(QUICK_RANGE_SELECT) keep track of the current maximum endpoint.
This is also more efficient as we save a call through the
handler API in case of open-ended intervals.
The code to calculate endpoints was extracted into
separate methods in QUICK_RANGE_SELECT, and it was possible to
get rid of some code duplication as part of fix.
for each record'
There was an error in an internal structure in the range
optimizer (SEL_ARG). Bad design causes parts of a data
structure not to be initialized when it is in a certain
state. All client code must check that this state is not
present before trying to access the structure's data. Fixed
by
- Checking the state before trying to access data (in
several places, most of which not covered by test case.)
- Copying the keypart id when cloning SEL_ARGs
mysql-test/r/range.result:
Bug#48459: Test result.
mysql-test/t/range.test:
Bug#48459: Test case.
sql/opt_range.cc:
Bug#48459: Fix + doxygenated count_key_part_usage comment.
for each record'
There was an error in an internal structure in the range
optimizer (SEL_ARG). Bad design causes parts of a data
structure not to be initialized when it is in a certain
state. All client code must check that this state is not
present before trying to access the structure's data. Fixed
by
- Checking the state before trying to access data (in
several places, most of which not covered by test case.)
- Copying the keypart id when cloning SEL_ARGs
When merging ranges during calculation of the result of OR
to two range sets the current range may be obsoleted by the
resulting merged range.
The first overlapping range can be obsoleted as well.
Fixed by moving the pointer to the first overlapping range to the
pointer of the resulting union range.
Added few comments at key places in key_or().
When merging ranges during calculation of the result of OR
to two range sets the current range may be obsoleted by the
resulting merged range.
The first overlapping range can be obsoleted as well.
Fixed by moving the pointer to the first overlapping range to the
pointer of the resulting union range.
Added few comments at key places in key_or().
