if embedded in a SELECT
An ORDER BY clause was bound to the incorrect
(sub-)statement when used in a UNION context.
In a query like:
SELECT * FROM a UNION SELECT * FROM b ORDER BY c
the result of SELECT * FROM b is sorted, and then
combined with a. The correct behaviour is that
the ORDER BY clause should be applied on the
final set. Similar behaviour was seen on LIMIT
clauses as well.
In a UNION statement, there will be a select_lex
object for each of the two selects, and a
select_lex_unit object that describes the UNION
itself. Similarly, the same behaviour was also
seen on derived tables.
The bug was caused by using a grammar rule for
ORDER BY and LIMIT that bound these elements
to thd->lex->current_select, which points to the
last of the two selects, instead of to the
fake_select_lex member of the master select_lex_unit
object.
Truncate the maximum result length (64-bit wide type) to fit into
the item maximum length (32-bit wide type). This is possible as
this specific branch is only used if the maximum result length
is less than 0x1000000 (MAX_BLOB_WIDTH), which fits comfortably
in a 32-bit wide type.
From a user perspective, the problem is that a FLUSH LOGS or SIGHUP
signal could end up associating the stdout and stderr to random
files. In the case of this bug report, the streams would end up
associated to InnoDB ibd files.
The freopen(3) function is not thread-safe on FreeBSD. What this
means is that if another thread calls open(2) during freopen()
is executing that another thread's fd returned by open(2) may get
re-associated with the file being passed to freopen(3). See FreeBSD
PR number 79887 for reference:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79887
This problem is worked around by substituting a internal hook within
the FILE structure. This avoids the loss of atomicity by not having
the original fd closed before its duplicated.
Patch based on the original work by Vasil Dimov.
Do not use nested AC_CHECK_FUNC() because they result in:
./configure: line 52688: syntax error: unexpected end of file
(which happens only on some platforms and does not happen on others,
I have no idea what is the reason for this)
- Second scenario checked:
Ensure via wait routines that the commit comes after the
processing of the statement which should get finally
the ER_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT
--> This should prevent the current bug.
- First scenario checked:
Ensure via wait routines that the statement is already waiting
for getting the lock before the commit is given.
--> No effect on the current bug, but ensure that the right
scenario is reached.
- Take care that disconnects are finished before the test ends.
--> Reduce the potential to harm succeeding tests.
- "Mangle" the printout of the current default innodb_lock_wait_timeout value
--> No need to adjust the test in case the default gets changed in future.
- remove the superfluous file
- add an preemptive removal of the outfile before the
SELECT ... INTO OUTFILE ...
2. Remove an already disabled subtest
It's functionality is covered by tests in the suite funcs_1.
3. Adjust the formatting within some sub testcase to the formatting used
in all other sub testcases
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(f1 f2 f3, ACTION_IF_PRESENT)
ACTION_IF_PRESENT is executed if any of f1, f2 or f3 is present.
Fix this misusage, we want the action to be executed if all of the
functions are present.
Check whether the master and purge thread are active after creating them. Do
not proceed until both threads have started. We do this by checking whether a
slot has been reserved by both the respective threads.
Add srv_thread_has_reserved_slot() returns slot no or ULINT_UNDEFINED.
rb://536 Approved by Jimmy
This assert could be triggered if -1 was inserted into
an auto increment column by a statement writing more than
one row.
Unless explicitly given, an interval of auto increment values
is generated when a statement first needs an auto increment
value. The triggered assert checks that the auto increment
counter is equal to or higher than the lower bound of this
interval.
Generally, the auto increment counter starts at 1 and is
incremented by 1 each time it is used. However, inserting an
explicit value into the auto increment column, sets the auto
increment counter to this value + 1 if this value is higher
than the current value of the auto increment counter.
This bug was triggered if the explicit value was -1. Since the
value was converted to unsigned before any comparisons were made,
it was found to be higher than the current vale of the auto
increment counter and the counter was set to -1 + 1. This value
was below the reserved interval and caused the assert to be
triggered the next time the statement tried to write a row.
With the patch for Bug#39828, this bug is no longer repeatable.
Now, -1 + 1 is detected as an "overflow" which causes the auto
increment counter to be set to ULONGLONG_MAX. This avoids hitting
the assert for the next insert and causes a new interval of
auto increment values to be generated. This resolves the issue.
This patch therefore only contains a regression test and no code
changes. Test case added to auto_increment.test.
This adds 64 new rows to performance_schema.rwlock_instances.
This patch will make perfschema.binlog_mix perfschema.binlog_row tests fail,
but they will be fixed by http://lists.mysql.com/commits/127862
Approved by: Jimmy (rb://554)
Fixed the test case to be independent of build options used.
Removed the lowercase-table-names constraint, since performance schema tables are now in lowercase.
