the local tree contains a fix for
Bug#32748 "Inconsistent handling of assignments to
general_log_file/slow_query_log_file",
which changes output of a number of tests.
PREPARE", review fixes:
- make the patch follow the specification of WL#4166 and remove
the new error that was originally introduced.
Now the client never gets an error from reprepare, unless it failed.
I.e. even if the statement at hand returns a completely different
result set, this is not considered a server error.
The C API library, that can not handle this situation, was modified to
return a client error.
Added additional test coverage.
first row or fails with an error:
ERROR 1022 (23000): Can't write; duplicate key in table ''
The server uses intermediate temporary table to store updated
row data. The first column of this table contains rowid.
Current server implementation doesn't reset NULL flag of that
column even if the server fills a column with rowid.
To keep each rowid unique, there is an unique index.
An insertion into an unique index takes into account NULL
flag of key value and ignores real data if NULL flag is set.
So, insertion of actually different rowids may lead to two
kind of problems. Visible effect of each of these problems
depends on an initial engine type of temporary table:
1. If multiupdate initially creates temporary table as
a MyISAM table (a table contains blob columns, and the
create_tmp_table function assumes, that this table is
large), it inserts only one single row and updates
only rows with one corresponding rowid. Other rows are
silently ignored.
2. If multiupdate initially creates MEMORY temporary
table, fills it with data and reaches size limit for
MEMORY tables (max_heap_table_size), multiupdate
converts MEMORY table into MyISAM table and fails
with an error:
ERROR 1022 (23000): Can't write; duplicate key in table ''
Multiupdate has been fixed to update the NULL flag of
temporary table rowid columns.
with dependent subqueries
An IN subquery is executed on EXPLAIN when it's not correlated.
If the subquery required a temporary table for its execution
not all the internal structures were restored from pointing to
the items of the temporary table to point back to the items of
the subquery.
Fixed by restoring the ref array when a temp tables were used in
executing the IN subquery during EXPLAIN EXTENDED.
slave
The stored-routine code took the contents of the (lowest) parser
and copied it directly to the binlog, which causes problems if there
is a special case of interpretation at the parser level -- which
there is, in the "/*!VER */" comments. The trailing "*/" caused
errors on the slave, naturally.
Now, since by that point we have /properly/ created parse-tree (as
the rest of the server should do!) for the stored-routine CREATE, we
can construct a perfect statement from that information, instead of
writing uncertain information from an unknown parser state.
Fortunately, there's already a function nearby that does exactly
that.
---
Update for Bug#36570. Qualify routine names with db name when
writing to the binlog ONLY if the source text is qualified.
