caused by patch which implemented new type-of-operation-aware
metadata locks and added a wait-for graph based deadlock
detector to the MDL subsystem (this patch fixed bug #46272
"MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and bug #37346
"innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter
table").
Crashes were caused by a race in MDL_context::try_acquire_lock().
This method added MDL_ticket to the list of granted tickets and
released lock protecting list before setting MDL_ticket::m_lock.
Thus some other thread was able to see ticket without properly
set m_lock member for some short period of time. If this thread
called method involving this member during this period crash
happened.
This fix ensures that MDL_ticket::m_lock is set in all cases
when ticket is added to granted/pending lists in MDL_lock.
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the
MDL subsystem.
Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and
bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and
alter table".
The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a
transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER
statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a
table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before
ALTER started.
The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level
locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after
innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout.
A transaction would start using the table and modify a few
rows.
Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows
into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on
the modified records and get blocked on a row lock.
The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get
blocked on thr_lock.c lock.
This situation of circular wait would only get resolved
by a timeout.
Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the
problem of deadlocks occurring between different
locking subsystems.
In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata
locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared
metadata lock to exclusive one.
Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for
some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively.
We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions
that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes
against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost
when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c
lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need
to abort such transactions.
The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any
mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks
in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than
innodb_lock_wait_timeout.
This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts
which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking
subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such
deadlocks inside MDL.
To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata
locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that
transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what
kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the
object.
This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable
metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all
transactions which has updated the table to go away.
This solves the second issue.
Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired
by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the
first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of
DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary.
Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by
this patch:
- From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those
statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock)
wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to
complete.
- From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE
(i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait
for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table
to complete.
As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies
to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE.
- DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort
statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or
renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete.
- Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock,
not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table
and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm
that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES
WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for
MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL
subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may
lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement
transactions even if these only use MyISAM:
session 1: session 2:
begin;
update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write;
-- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1
update t2 ...
(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK)
- Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE
was abandoned.
LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same
priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE.
SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in
the wait queue.
- We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly
locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses
table t1, and issues:
LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE;
FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'),
an error is produced.
In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES,
the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
condition variable per context instead of one mutex and one conditional
variable for the whole subsystem.
This should increase concurrency in this subsystem.
It also opens the way for further changes which are necessary to solve
such bugs as bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock"
and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter
table".
Two other notable changes done by this patch:
- MDL subsystem no longer implicitly acquires global intention exclusive
metadata lock when per-object metadata lock is acquired. Now this has
to be done by explicit calls outside of MDL subsystem.
- Instead of using separate MDL_context for opening system tables/tables
for purposes of I_S we now create MDL savepoint in the main context
before opening tables and rollback to this savepoint after closing
them. This means that it is now possible to get ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error
even not inside a transaction. This might happen in unlikely case when
one runs DDL on one of system tables while also running DDL on some
other tables. Cases when this ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error is not justified
will be addressed by advanced deadlock detector for MDL subsystem which
we plan to implement.
This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters
conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible.
The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when
we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all
metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait
until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple
empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it
turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by
this transaction.
This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989
is not fully fixed in case of ALTER".
The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE
statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already
has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have
resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER
TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by
ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log
order as a consequence.
This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in
mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock
upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all
metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction
silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened.
We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all
locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were
acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them
by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple
deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be
done anyway for it.
"HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks".
Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel
is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two
groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only
one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK
TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK
and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK.
The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when
someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g.
if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally,
see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()).
MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it.
******
A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a
transaction might lead to deadlocks".
An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction-
agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction,
and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection)
could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when
HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting
metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement
also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a
transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait
could occur.
Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically
closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection.
Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock
in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait
indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
is produced.
The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context
with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional
locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits
with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single
MDL context of the connection.
Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life
cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so
are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas
transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction
and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT,
a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context.
All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list.
However, a selected element of the list separates locks with
different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the
end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are
prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel.
Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only
release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks
must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement,
or an implicit close.
The same approach with sentinel
is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES
statement has never worked together, the implementation is
made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either
for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
The reason for the deadlock was an improper exit from
MDL_context::wait_for_locks() which caused mysys_var->current_mutex to remain
LOCK_mdl even though LOCK_mdl was no longer held by that connection.
This could for example lead to a deadlock in the following way:
1) INSERT DELAYED tries to open a table but fails, and trying to recover it
calls wait_for_locks().
2) Due to a pending exclusive request, wait_for_locks() fails and exits without
resetting mysys_var->current_mutex for the delayed insert handler thread. So it
continues to point to LOCK_mdl.
3) The handler thread manages to open a table.
4) A different connection takes LOCK_open and tries to take LOCK_mdl.
5) FLUSH TABLES from a third connection notices that the handler thread has a
table open, and tries to kill it. This involves locking mysys_var->current_mutex
while having LOCK_open locked. Since current_mutex mistakenly points to LOCK_mdl,
we have a deadlock.
This patch makes sure MDL_EXIT_COND() is called before exiting wait_for_locks().
This clears mysys->current_mutex which resolves the issue.
An assert is added to recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt() after
wait_for_locks() is called, to check that current_mutex is indeed reset.
With this assert in place, existing tests in (e.g.) mdl_sync.test will fail
without this patch.
Bug#42546 Backup: RESTORE fails, thinking it finds an existing table
The problem occured when a MDL locking conflict happened for a non-existent
table between a CREATE and a INSERT statement. The code for CREATE
interpreted this lock conflict to mean that the table existed,
which meant that the statement failed when it should not have.
The problem could occur for CREATE TABLE, CREATE TABLE LIKE and
ALTER TABLE RENAME.
This patch fixes the problem for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
It is based on code backported from the mysql-6.1-fk tree written
by Dmitry Lenev. CREATE now uses normal open_and_lock_tables() code
to acquire exclusive locks. This means that for the test case in the bug
description, CREATE will wait until INSERT completes so that it can
get the exclusive lock. This resolves the reported bug.
The patch also prohibits CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE under
LOCK TABLES. Note that this is an incompatible change and must
be reflected in the documentation. Affected test cases have been
updated.
mdl_sync.test contains tests for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
Fixing the issue for ALTER TABLE RENAME is beyond the scope of this
patch. ALTER TABLE cannot be prohibited from working under LOCK TABLES
as this could seriously impact customers and a proper fix would require
a significant rewrite.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.25
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg-pre2-2
timestamp: Wed 2009-09-16 18:26:50 +0400
message:
Follow-up for one of pre-requisite patches for fixing bug #30977
"Concurrent statement using stored function and DROP FUNCTION
breaks SBR".
Made enum_mdl_namespace enum part of MDL_key class and removed MDL_
prefix from the names of enum members. In order to do the latter
changed name of PROCEDURE symbol to PROCEDURE_SYM (otherwise macro
which was automatically generated for this symbol conflicted with
MDL_key::PROCEDURE enum member).
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.68.24
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bg-pre2-2
timestamp: Wed 2009-09-16 17:25:29 +0400
message:
Pre-requisite patch for fixing bug #30977 "Concurrent statement
using stored function and DROP FUNCTION breaks SBR".
Added MDL_request for stored routine as member to Sroutine_hash_entry
in order to be able perform metadata locking for stored routines in
future (Sroutine_hash_entry is an equivalent of TABLE_LIST class for
stored routines).
(WL#4284, follow up fixes).
Bug #47249 assert in MDL_global_lock::is_lock_type_compatible
This assert could be triggered if LOCK TABLES were used to lock
both a table and a view that used the same table. The table would have
to be first WRITE locked and then READ locked. So "LOCK TABLES v1
WRITE, t1 READ" would eventually trigger the assert, "LOCK TABLES
v1 READ, t1 WRITE" would not. The reason is that the ordering of locks
in the interal representation made a difference when executing
FLUSH TABLE on the table.
During FLUSH TABLE, a lock was upgraded to exclusive. If this lock
was of type MDL_SHARED and not MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE, an internal
counter in the MDL subsystem would get out of sync. This would happen
if the *last* mention of the table in LOCK TABLES was a READ lock.
The counter in question is the number exclusive locks (active or intention).
This is used to make sure a global metadata lock is only taken when the
counter is zero (= no conflicts). The counter is increased when a
MDL_EXCLUSIVE or MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE lock is taken, but not when
upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive() is used to upgrade directly
from MDL_SHARED to MDL_EXCLUSIVE.
This patch fixes the problem by searching for a TABLE instance locked
with MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE or MDL_EXCLUSIVE before calling
upgrade_shared_lock_to_exclusive(). The patch also adds an assert checking
that only MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE locks are upgraded to exclusive.
Test case added to lock_multi.test.
A pre-requisite patch for Bug#30977 "Concurrent statement using
stored function and DROP FUNCTION breaks SBR".
This patch changes the MDL API by introducing a namespace for
lock keys: MDL_TABLE for tables and views and MDL_PROCEDURE
for stored procedures and functions. The latter is needed for
the fix for Bug#30977.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.20
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: 5.4-4284-1-assert
timestamp: Thu 2009-08-13 18:29:55 +0400
message:
WL#4284 "Transactional DDL locking"
A review fix.
Since WL#4284 implementation separated MDL_request and MDL_ticket,
MDL_request becamse a utility object necessary only to get a ticket.
Store it by-value in TABLE_LIST with the intent to merge
MDL_request::key with table_list->table_name and table_list->db
in future.
Change the MDL subsystem to not require MDL_requests to
stay around till close_thread_tables().
Remove the list of requests from the MDL context.
Requests for shared metadata locks acquired in open_tables()
are only used as a list in recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt(),
which calls mdl_context.wait_for_locks() for this list.
To keep such list for recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt(),
introduce a context class (Open_table_context), that collects
all requests.
A lot of minor cleanups and simplications that became possible
with this change.
2617.31.12, 2617.31.15, 2617.31.15, 2617.31.16, 2617.43.1
- initial changeset that introduced the fix for
Bug#989 and follow up fixes for all test suite failures
introduced in the initial changeset.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.31.1
committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM>
branch nick: 4284-6.0
timestamp: Fri 2009-03-06 19:17:00 -0300
message:
Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order
WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking
Currently the MySQL server does not keep metadata locks on
schema objects for the duration of a transaction, thus failing
to guarantee the integrity of the schema objects being used
during the transaction and to protect then from concurrent
DDL operations. This also poses a problem for replication as
a DDL operation might be replicated even thought there are
active transactions using the object being modified.
The solution is to defer the release of metadata locks until
a active transaction is either committed or rolled back. This
prevents other statements from modifying the table for the
entire duration of the transaction. This provides commitment
ordering for guaranteeing serializability across multiple
transactions.
- Incompatible change:
If MySQL's metadata locking system encounters a lock conflict,
the usual schema is to use the try and back-off technique to
avoid deadlocks -- this schema consists in releasing all locks
and trying to acquire them all in one go.
But in a transactional context this algorithm can't be utilized
as its not possible to release locks acquired during the course
of the transaction without breaking the transaction commitments.
To avoid deadlocks in this case, the ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK will be
returned if a lock conflict is encountered during a transaction.
Let's consider an example:
A transaction has two statements that modify table t1, then table
t2, and then commits. The first statement of the transaction will
acquire a shared metadata lock on table t1, and it will be kept
utill COMMIT to ensure serializability.
At the moment when the second statement attempts to acquire a
shared metadata lock on t2, a concurrent ALTER or DROP statement
might have locked t2 exclusively. The prescription of the current
locking protocol is that the acquirer of the shared lock backs off
-- gives up all his current locks and retries. This implies that
the entire multi-statement transaction has to be rolled back.
- Incompatible change:
FLUSH commands such as FLUSH PRIVILEGES and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ
LOCK won't cause locked tables to be implicitly unlocked anymore.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.23.20
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-runtime
timestamp: Wed 2009-03-04 16:31:31 +0300
message:
WL#4284 "Transactional DDL locking"
Review comments: "Objectify" the MDL API.
MDL_request and MDL_context still need manual construction and
destruction, since they are used in environment that is averse
to constructors/destructors.
----------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.23.19
committer: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-runtime
timestamp: Tue 2009-03-03 01:20:44 +0300
message:
Metadata locking: realign comments. No semantical changes,
only enforce a bit of the coding style.
This is a review fix for WL#4284 "Transactional DDL locking".
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.23.18
committer: Davi Arnaut <Davi.Arnaut@Sun.COM>
branch nick: 4284-6.0
timestamp: Mon 2009-03-02 18:18:26 -0300
message:
Bug#989: If DROP TABLE while there's an active transaction, wrong binlog order
WL#4284: Transactional DDL locking
This is a prerequisite patch:
These changes are intended to split lock requests from granted
locks and to allow the memory and lifetime of granted locks to
be managed within the MDL subsystem. Furthermore, tickets can
now be shared and therefore are used to satisfy multiple lock
requests, but only shared locks can be recursive.
The problem is that the MDL subsystem morphs lock requests into
granted locks locks but does not manage the memory and lifetime
of lock requests, and hence, does not manage the memory of
granted locks either. This can be problematic because it puts the
burden of tracking references on the users of the subsystem and
it can't be easily done in transactional contexts where the locks
have to be kept around for the duration of a transaction.
Another issue is that recursive locks (when the context trying to
acquire a lock already holds a lock on the same object) requires
that each time the lock is granted, a unique lock request/granted
lock structure structure must be kept around until the lock is
released. This can lead to memory leaks in transactional contexts
as locks taken during the transaction should only be released at
the end of the transaction. This also leads to unnecessary wake
ups (broadcasts) in the MDL subsystem if the context still holds
a equivalent of the lock being released.
These issues are exacerbated due to the fact that WL#4284 low-level
design says that the implementation should "2) Store metadata locks
in transaction memory root, rather than statement memory root" but
this is not possible because a memory root, as implemented in mysys,
requires all objects allocated from it to be freed all at once.
This patch combines review input and significant code contributions
from Konstantin Osipov (kostja) and Dmitri Lenev (dlenev).
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.33
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w2
timestamp: Fri 2008-06-20 17:11:20 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
After-review fixes in progress.
Minimized dependency of mdl.cc on other modules (particularly
made it independant of mysql_priv.h) in order to be able
write unit tests for metadata locking subsystem.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.24
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w2
timestamp: Fri 2008-06-06 14:28:58 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
After review fixes in progress.
Get rid of upgradability and priority attributes of
metadata lock requests by replacing them with two
new types of lock requests MDL_SHARED_UPGRADABLE and
MDL_SHARED_HIGH_PRIO correspondingly.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.22
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w2
timestamp: Thu 2008-06-05 22:06:48 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects"
After review fixes in progress.
Moved code checking that current lock request can be satisfied
given the current state of individual or global metadata lock
to separate well-documented functions.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.18
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w2
timestamp: Tue 2008-06-03 21:07:58 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
After review fixes in progress.
Now during upgrading/downgrading metadata locks we deal with
individual metadata lock requests rather than with all requests
for this object in the context. This makes API a bit more clear
and makes adjust_mdl_locks_upgradability() much nicer.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.17
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w2
timestamp: Thu 2008-05-29 16:52:56 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
After review fixes in progress.
"The great correction of names".
Renamed MDL_LOCK and MDL_LOCK_DATA classes to make usage of
these names in metadata locking subsystem consistent with
other parts of server (i.e. thr_lock.cc). Now we MDL_LOCK_DATA
corresponds to request for a lock and MDL_LOCK to the lock
itself. Adjusted code in MDL subsystem and other places
using these classes accordingly.
Did similar thing for GLOBAL_MDL_LOCK_DATA class and also
changed name of its members to correspond to names of
MDL_LOCK_DATA members.
Finally got rid of usage of one letter variables in MDL
code since it makes code harder to search in (according
to reviewer).
Backport of:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.1
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w
timestamp: Fri 2008-05-23 17:54:03 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
After review fixes in progress.
------------------------------------------------------------
This is the first patch in series. It transforms the metadata
locking subsystem to use a dedicated module (mdl.h,cc). No
significant changes in the locking protocol.
The import passes the test suite with the exception of
deprecated/removed 6.0 features, and MERGE tables. The latter
are subject to a fix by WL#4144.
Unfortunately, the original changeset comments got lost in a merge,
thus this import has its own (largely insufficient) comments.
This patch fixes Bug#25144 "replication / binlog with view breaks".
Warning: this patch introduces an incompatible change:
Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to FLUSH a table that
was not locked for WRITE.
Under LOCK TABLES, it's no longer possible to DROP a table or
VIEW that was not locked for WRITE.
******
Backport of:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.2
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w
timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:03:45 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
After review fixes in progress.
******
Backport of:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.3
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w
timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 14:08:51 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects"
Fixed failing Windows builds by adding mdl.cc to the lists
of files needed to build server/libmysqld on Windows.
******
Backport of:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.4
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w
timestamp: Sat 2008-05-24 21:57:58 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
Fix for assert failures in kill.test which occured when one
tried to kill ALTER TABLE statement on merge table while it
was waiting in wait_while_table_is_used() for other connections
to close this table.
These assert failures stemmed from the fact that cleanup code
in this case assumed that temporary table representing new
version of table was open with adding to THD::temporary_tables
list while code which were opening this temporary table wasn't
always fulfilling this.
This patch changes code that opens new version of table to
always do this linking in. It also streamlines cleanup process
for cases when error occurs while we have new version of table
open.
******
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects"
Add libmysqld/mdl.cc to .bzrignore.
******
Backport of:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2630.4.6
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-3726-w
timestamp: Sun 2008-05-25 00:33:22 +0400
message:
WL#3726 "DDL locking for all metadata objects".
Addition to the fix of assert failures in kill.test caused by
changes for this worklog.
Make sure we close the new table only once.
