Add a simple test case to look a implementations that use doc/lit (bare) interfaces. There was a conversation on the ML about whether databinding is clever enough to translate between bare and wrapped as the data passes from implementation to binding as it's send through a reference. At the moment the test gives me index out of bounds.

git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@1057230 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/impl/SampleWSDLProxy.java b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/impl/SampleWSDLProxy.java
index 176dac6b15..5b42bce28f 100644
--- a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/impl/SampleWSDLProxy.java
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/impl/SampleWSDLProxy.java
@@ -68,6 +68,16 @@ class SampleWSDLProxy implements WSDLReference {
     }
     
     @Override
+    public Element callBare(String op, Element... e) {
+        try {
+            // Invoke the named operation on the endpoint reference
+            return (Element)repr.invoke(ops.get(op), e);
+        } catch(InvocationTargetException ex) {
+            throw new RuntimeException(ex);
+        }
+    }    
+    
+    @Override
     public void callAsync(String op, Element e) {
         // Asynchronously invoke the named operation on the endpoint reference
         Message message = mf.createMessage();