summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorslaws <slaws@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68>2011-01-10 15:08:32 +0000
committerslaws <slaws@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68>2011-01-10 15:08:32 +0000
commit181bc548fd1a9b5a6f39882cb4102751230de642 (patch)
tree59e48664084e6237dae49ab0701e7f1fc47d5d17 /sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api
parent966fa611b66117a5eb448369c3a12f6dc7cccb33 (diff)
Add a simple test case to look a implementations that use doc/lit (bare) interfaces. There was a conversation on the ML about whether databinding is clever enough to translate between bare and wrapped as the data passes from implementation to binding as it's send through a reference. At the moment the test gives me index out of bounds.
git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@1057230 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Diffstat (limited to 'sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api')
-rw-r--r--sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api/WSDLReference.java1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api/WSDLReference.java b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api/WSDLReference.java
index bc0d5cc5d8..a25df3e895 100644
--- a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api/WSDLReference.java
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/extending-tuscany/implementation-sample/src/main/java/sample/api/WSDLReference.java
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import org.w3c.dom.Element;
public interface WSDLReference {
Element call(String op, Element e);
+ public Element callBare(String op, Element... e);
void callAsync(String op, Element e);
}