diff options
author | slaws <slaws@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68> | 2010-08-20 08:06:37 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | slaws <slaws@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68> | 2010-08-20 08:06:37 +0000 |
commit | 702e7f90d478f4c92149e6057eff5a48b4c6061e (patch) | |
tree | 7c5db3d59abd84f8ffec739a9019e47af91e6825 /sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache | |
parent | 36af914e9f845cebbf5a1c4bbf11264c3abbd92f (diff) |
TUSCANY-3653 - correct the processing for finding the first port type in a WSDL referenced by a JAXWS annotation. If we just leave it up to the existing Tuscany processing an unexpected port type will result as Tuscany collects together WSDL in the same namespace
git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@987399 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Diffstat (limited to 'sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache')
-rw-r--r-- | sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/wsdl/xml/WSDLInterfaceProcessor.java | 95 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/wsdl/xml/WSDLInterfaceProcessor.java b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/wsdl/xml/WSDLInterfaceProcessor.java index 94d7799402..3c550d9781 100644 --- a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/wsdl/xml/WSDLInterfaceProcessor.java +++ b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/interface-wsdl/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/wsdl/xml/WSDLInterfaceProcessor.java @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import java.net.URI; import java.util.List; import javax.wsdl.PortType; +import javax.wsdl.WSDLElement; import javax.xml.namespace.QName; import javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException; import javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamReader; @@ -371,8 +372,8 @@ public class WSDLInterfaceProcessor extends BaseStAXArtifactProcessor implements // if the contract has a location but no WSDL definition yet we need to read the WSDL // from the specified location and create an interface based on the first port type - // this is required if the user uses the @WebService(wsdlLocatio="") annotation in a - // Java component implementation. + // this is required if the user uses the @WebService(wsdlLocation="") or + // @WebServiceProvider(wsdlLocation="") annotation in a Java component implementation. if (wsdlInterfaceContract.getLocation() != null && wsdlInterface.getWsdlDefinition() == null){ @@ -383,31 +384,40 @@ public class WSDLInterfaceProcessor extends BaseStAXArtifactProcessor implements try { wsdlFileURI = new URI(wsdlInterfaceContract.getLocation()); } catch (Exception ex) { - ex.printStackTrace(); - // TODO - raise error + Monitor.error(context.getMonitor(), + WSDLInterfaceProcessor.class.getName(), + "interface-wsdlxml-validation-messages", + "wsdliLocationException", + ex.getMessage() ); + return; } - if (wsdlFileURI.isAbsolute()){ - // use the wsdli:wsdlLocation mechanism in the WSDLModelResolver to - // load the WSDL from an absolute location - wsdlDefinition = wsdlFactory.createWSDLDefinition(); - wsdlDefinition.setUnresolved(true); - wsdlDefinition.setNamespace("nonamespace"); - wsdlDefinition.getWsdliLocations().put("nonamespace", wsdlInterfaceContract.getLocation()); - } else { - // Find the wsdl in the contribution ready for further resolution - try { - URI contributionLocation = new URI(context.getContribution().getLocation()); - URI wsdlLocation = contributionLocation.resolve(wsdlFileURI); + // We need to find a portType from the user specified WSDL (the first one?) from which to defined + // the service interface. We can't just use the Tuscany resolution mechanism to find the WSDL file + // as that lumps together all WSDL in the same namespace. That's fine if you already know what portType + // your after. In this case we don't so we have to get the WSDL specified, find out what it's first portType + // is and then go from there with the usual Tuscany resolution mechanism + try { + if (wsdlFileURI.isAbsolute()){ + // use the wsdli:wsdlLocation mechanism in the WSDLModelResolver to + // load the WSDL from an absolute location + wsdlDefinition = wsdlFactory.createWSDLDefinition(); + wsdlDefinition.setUnresolved(true); + wsdlDefinition.setNamespace("nonamespace"); + wsdlDefinition.getWsdliLocations().put("nonamespace", wsdlInterfaceContract.getLocation()); + wsdlDefinition.setLocation(new URI(wsdlInterfaceContract.getLocation())); + } else { + // Find the wsdl in the contribution ready for further resolution for (Artifact artifact : context.getContribution().getArtifacts()) { - // TODO - SL a hack while I work out if the bigger picture will hang together - // need more intelligence when applying a relative URI to an existing URI. if (artifact.getLocation().endsWith(wsdlInterfaceContract.getLocation())){ - //URI artifactLocation = new URI(artifact.getLocation()).normalize(); - //if (artifactLocation.equals(wsdlLocation)){ - wsdlDefinition = artifact.getModel(); - break; - //} + WSDLDefinition artifactWSDLDefinition = artifact.getModel(); + wsdlDefinition = wsdlFactory.createWSDLDefinition(); + wsdlDefinition.setUnresolved(true); + wsdlDefinition.setNamespace(artifactWSDLDefinition.getNamespace()); + wsdlDefinition.getWsdliLocations().put(artifactWSDLDefinition.getNamespace(), + artifact.getLocation()); + wsdlDefinition.setLocation(new URI(artifact.getLocation())); + break; } } @@ -419,26 +429,33 @@ public class WSDLInterfaceProcessor extends BaseStAXArtifactProcessor implements "WSDL not found inside contribution at relative URI " + wsdlFileURI ); return; } - - } catch (Exception ex) { - Monitor.error(context.getMonitor(), - WSDLInterfaceProcessor.class.getName(), - "interface-wsdlxml-validation-messages", - "wsdliLocationException", - ex.getMessage() ); - return; - } + } catch (Exception ex) { + Monitor.error(context.getMonitor(), + WSDLInterfaceProcessor.class.getName(), + "interface-wsdlxml-validation-messages", + "wsdliLocationException", + ex.getMessage() ); + return; } - wsdlInterface.setWsdlDefinition(wsdlDefinition); + wsdlDefinition.setUnresolved(true); + wsdlDefinition = resolver.resolveModel(WSDLDefinition.class, wsdlDefinition, context); + // create the interface based on the first port type PortType portType = (PortType)wsdlDefinition.getDefinition().getAllPortTypes().values().iterator().next(); - if(portType != null){ - wsdlInterface.setName(portType.getQName()); - } else { - // raise an error - } - + try { + WSDLInterface newWSDLInterface = wsdlFactory.createWSDLInterface(portType, wsdlDefinition, resolver, monitor); + newWSDLInterface.getRequiredIntents().addAll(wsdlInterface.getRequiredIntents()); + newWSDLInterface.getPolicySets().addAll(wsdlInterface.getPolicySets()); + wsdlInterface = newWSDLInterface; + } catch (InvalidInterfaceException e) { + ContributionResolveException ce = new ContributionResolveException("Invalid interface when resolving " + + portType.toString(), e); + error(monitor, "ContributionResolveException", wsdlFactory, ce); + } + + wsdlInterface.setWsdlDefinition(wsdlDefinition); + wsdlInterfaceContract.setInterface(wsdlInterface); } // Resolve the interface and callback interface |