summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorscottkurz <scottkurz@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68>2011-01-20 14:57:06 +0000
committerscottkurz <scottkurz@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68>2011-01-20 14:57:06 +0000
commitde7789044d196dfadab3b8ddfddf2f26f7a1bbd8 (patch)
treea2eef7b87fb6b98af951c68a188ceb9ac5977f47 /sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main
parent81ab42fb0730a787d799c870e09726ec1fb82116 (diff)
Fix for TUSCANY-3819 (still need to cleanup bare case, wsdlgen).
git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@1061329 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Diffstat (limited to 'sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main')
-rw-r--r--sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/implementation/java/invocation/JavaImplementationInvoker.java73
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/implementation/java/invocation/JavaImplementationInvoker.java b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/implementation/java/invocation/JavaImplementationInvoker.java
index 69da9019a8..ef325e4ae9 100644
--- a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/implementation/java/invocation/JavaImplementationInvoker.java
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/implementation-java-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/implementation/java/invocation/JavaImplementationInvoker.java
@@ -133,22 +133,28 @@ public class JavaImplementationInvoker implements Invoker {
// Only check Holder for remotable interfaces
if (imethod != null && op.getInterface().isRemotable()) {
List<DataType> inputTypes = op.getInputType().getLogical();
- for (int i = 0, size = inputTypes.size(); i < size; i++) {
- if (ParameterMode.IN != op.getParameterModes().get(i)) {
- // Promote array params from [<T>] to [Holder<T>]
- Object[] payloadArray = (Object[])payload;
-
- if ( ParameterMode.INOUT == op.getParameterModes().get(i)) {
- Object item = payloadArray[i];
- payloadArray[i] = new Holder(item);
- } else {
- // Create an empty Holder since we should not pass values for OUT parameters
- payloadArray[i] = new Holder();
- }
-
+ Object[] payloadArray = (Object[])payload;
+ List<Object> payloadList = new ArrayList<Object>();
+ for (int i = 0, nextIndex = 0; i < inputTypes.size(); i++) {
+ ParameterMode mode = op.getParameterModes().get(i);
+ if (ParameterMode.IN == mode ) {
+ payloadList.add(payloadArray[nextIndex++]);
+ } else if (ParameterMode.INOUT == mode ) {
+ // Promote array params from [<T>] to [Holder<T>]
+ Object item = payloadArray[nextIndex++];
+ Holder itemHolder = new Holder(item);
+ payloadList.add(itemHolder);
argumentHolderCount++;
- }
+ } else {
+ // Create an empty Holder since we should not pass values for OUT parameters
+ payloadList.add(new Holder());
+ argumentHolderCount++;
+ }
}
+
+ // Maybe a bit odd to do but this way I don't have to worry about how the invoke if/else
+ // immediately following might need to be changed.
+ payload = payloadList.toArray();
}
Object ret;
@@ -164,18 +170,47 @@ public class JavaImplementationInvoker implements Invoker {
if (argumentHolderCount > 0) {
// Holder pattern. Any payload Holder<T> types are returned as part of the message body.
- Object[] payloadArray = (Object[])payload;
+ Object[] payloadArray = (Object[])payload;
+
+ ArrayList<Object> holderOutputs = new ArrayList<Object>();
ArrayList<Object> result = new ArrayList<Object>();
- if (imethod != null) {
-
- result.add(ret);
+ if (imethod != null) {
+
for (int i = 0, size = op.getParameterModes().size(); i < size; i++) {
if (ParameterMode.IN != op.getParameterModes().get(i)) {
// Demote array params from Holder<T> to <T>.
Holder<Object> item = (Holder<Object>)payloadArray[i];
payloadArray[i] = item.value;
- result.add(payloadArray[i]);
+ holderOutputs.add(payloadArray[i]);
+ }
+ }
+
+ //
+ // Now we account for the fact that we may have a null because of a void return type,
+ // which is not part of the output DataType, and so should not be returned with the array
+ // of outputs, or we may have a null as value returned
+ // from a method with signature with return type other than void, which should be returned
+ // in the output array.
+ //
+ // The logic here is if we already have as many outputs in holders as we have outputs
+ // altogether, then we don't worry about the return value (which should be null). Might
+ // be simpler to just check for void, but the code in the Java introspector has a lot
+ // of quirks for handling parameterized types, and this seems simpler for now.
+ //
+ int holderOutputSize = holderOutputs.size();
+ int numberOperationOutputs = op.getOutputType().getLogical().size();
+ if (holderOutputSize == numberOperationOutputs) {
+ if (ret != null) {
+ throw new IllegalStateException("Number of holder outputs equal to number of operations outputs." +
+ "\nNum = " + holderOutputSize + ", but non-null return value seen: " + ret);
}
+ result = holderOutputs;
+ } else if (holderOutputSize == numberOperationOutputs - 1) {
+ result.add(ret);
+ result.addAll(1, holderOutputs);
+ } else {
+ throw new IllegalStateException("Number of holder outputs seen: " + holderOutputSize +
+ "\nNumber of operation outputs: " + numberOperationOutputs);
}
}