summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorslaws <slaws@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68>2010-05-11 18:40:54 +0000
committerslaws <slaws@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68>2010-05-11 18:40:54 +0000
commitb194aae6f8c2ed31a40439502d96c48ba1c51182 (patch)
tree3b831a85849f321201c48aaa1baa0337e82c4023 /sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main
parent11e1255139e74b2e7baaeaa80354b91d09fd80d9 (diff)
TUSCANY-3553 - add the SCA spec schema to the system contribution so that users can use SCA schema in property types. I don't know why people would want to do that but this capability seems to be the intention of the spec. This slows down the loading of any contributions that use these types, as the schema are loaded, but has little affect if you don't. I'm still looking at whether the local scheme optimization I added is effective but decided to check in as this fault is stopping the otests from running properly currently.
git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@943224 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Diffstat (limited to 'sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main')
-rw-r--r--sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/deployment/impl/DeployerImpl.java51
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/deployment/impl/DeployerImpl.java b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/deployment/impl/DeployerImpl.java
index a510219501..b356df0f35 100644
--- a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/deployment/impl/DeployerImpl.java
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/deployment/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/deployment/impl/DeployerImpl.java
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.BuilderContext;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.BuilderExtensionPoint;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.CompositeBuilder;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.CompositeBuilderException;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xsd.Constants;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.common.xml.stax.StAXHelper;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.Artifact;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.Contribution;
@@ -77,6 +78,8 @@ import org.apache.tuscany.sca.definitions.xml.DefinitionsExtensionPoint;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.deployment.Deployer;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.monitor.Monitor;
import org.apache.tuscany.sca.monitor.MonitorFactory;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.xsd.XSDFactory;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.xsd.XSDefinition;
/**
*
@@ -98,11 +101,14 @@ public class DeployerImpl implements Deployer {
protected Definitions systemDefinitions;
protected ExtensibleURLArtifactProcessor artifactProcessor;
protected ExtensibleStAXArtifactProcessor staxProcessor;
+ protected ValidationSchemaExtensionPoint validationSchema;
protected MonitorFactory monitorFactory;
protected static final String DEPLOYER_IMPL_VALIDATION_MESSAGES =
"org.apache.tuscany.sca.deployment.impl.deployer-impl-validation-messages";
+
+ public static final QName XSD = new QName("http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema", "schema");
/**
* @param registry
@@ -301,6 +307,9 @@ public class DeployerImpl implements Deployer {
compositeBuilder =
compositeBuilders.getCompositeBuilder("org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.CompositeBuilder");
+ // get the validation schema
+ validationSchema = registry.getExtensionPoint(ValidationSchemaExtensionPoint.class);
+
loadSystemContribution(new ProcessorContext(monitorFactory.createMonitor()));
inited = true;
@@ -341,7 +350,7 @@ public class DeployerImpl implements Deployer {
artifact.setLocation("Derived");
artifact.setModel(systemDefinitions);
artifacts.add(artifact);
-
+
// now resolve and add the system contribution
try {
contributionProcessor.resolve(systemContribution, modelResolver, context);
@@ -355,6 +364,7 @@ public class DeployerImpl implements Deployer {
Contribution contribution = contributionFactory.createContribution();
contribution.setURI(systemContribution.getURI());
contribution.setLocation(systemContribution.getLocation());
+
ModelResolver modelResolver = new ExtensibleModelResolver(contribution, modelResolvers, modelFactories);
contribution.setModelResolver(modelResolver);
contribution.setUnresolved(true);
@@ -362,6 +372,7 @@ public class DeployerImpl implements Deployer {
DefinitionsFactory definitionsFactory = modelFactories.getFactory(DefinitionsFactory.class);
Definitions definitions = definitionsFactory.createDefinitions();
DefinitionsUtil.aggregate(systemDefinitions, definitions, monitor);
+
// create an artifact to represent the system defintions and
// add it to the contribution
List<Artifact> artifacts = contribution.getArtifacts();
@@ -370,6 +381,44 @@ public class DeployerImpl implements Deployer {
artifact.setLocation("Derived");
artifact.setModel(definitions);
artifacts.add(artifact);
+
+ // create resolver entries to represent the SCA schema. We don't create artifacts
+ // in the contribution as the XSD schema are only actually loaded on demand
+ // so as long as they are in the model resolver we are set. We do it on the clone
+ // so that every copy of the system contribution has the schema
+ ProcessorContext context = new ProcessorContext(monitor);
+ XSDFactory xsdFactory = modelFactories.getFactory(XSDFactory.class);
+ List<String> scaSchemas = validationSchema.getSchemas();
+ for (String scaSchemaLocation : scaSchemas){
+ try {
+ URL scaSchemaURL = new URL(scaSchemaLocation);
+ String namespace = staxHelper.readAttribute(scaSchemaURL, XSD, "targetNamespace");
+
+ // if this is the SCA schema store it in the system contribution
+ if (namespace.equals(Constants.SCA11_TUSCANY_NS)){
+
+ // add the schema to the model resolver under the Tuscany namespace
+ XSDefinition scaSchema = xsdFactory.createXSDefinition();
+ scaSchema.setUnresolved(true);
+ scaSchema.setNamespace(namespace);
+ scaSchema.setLocation(scaSchemaURL.toURI());
+ scaSchema.setUnresolved(false);
+// modelResolver.addModel(scaSchema, context);
+
+ // we know that the SCA schema's are referenced form the Tuscany schemas so
+ // register the schema under the SCA namsepace too
+ scaSchema = xsdFactory.createXSDefinition();
+ scaSchema.setUnresolved(true);
+ scaSchema.setNamespace(Constants.SCA11_NS);
+ scaSchema.setLocation(scaSchemaURL.toURI());
+ scaSchema.setUnresolved(false);
+ modelResolver.addModel(scaSchema, context);
+ }
+ } catch (Exception ex) {
+ throw new IllegalStateException(ex);
+ }
+ }
+
return contribution;
}