Tidy up the binding interface to include the wire format and operation selector operations. They are in the OASIS specs now so it doesn't seem sensible to maintain the separate (experimental) interface that previously housed them. We want to encourage binding writers to provide wire formats and operation selectors as appropriate

git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@886122 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java
index 8e6684b44d..7480d8fe17 100644
--- a/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java
+++ b/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/JMSBinding.java
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ import java.util.TreeSet;
 
 import javax.xml.namespace.QName;
 
-import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.BindingRRB;
+import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.Binding;
 import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.ConfiguredOperation;
 import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.OperationSelector;
 import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.OperationsConfigurator;
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.PolicySubject;
  */
 
 //public class JMSBinding implements BindingRRB, PolicySubject, OperationsConfigurator, DefinitionElement {
-public class JMSBinding implements BindingRRB, PolicySubject, OperationsConfigurator {
+public class JMSBinding implements Binding, PolicySubject, OperationsConfigurator {
     QName TYPE = new QName(SCA11_NS, "binding.jms");
 
     @Override