diff options
author | lresende <lresende@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68> | 2008-10-31 20:46:38 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | lresende <lresende@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68> | 2008-10-31 20:46:38 +0000 |
commit | a7cc138052938a24d9dd90d087427853d74c1b73 (patch) | |
tree | ae0d450e2a2e1f5ff3e2fa77f4ca18e1785de723 | |
parent | 39244727fea24f3f5af3d4ae83206d7746b1205e (diff) |
Fixing SPI violation in test case that was using non-exported package org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.introspect.impl.ServiceProcessor
git-svn-id: http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany@709562 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
-rw-r--r-- | branches/sca-equinox/modules/policy-security-jsr250/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/jsr250/introspect/impl/PolicyProcessorTestCaseFIXME.java | 21 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/branches/sca-equinox/modules/policy-security-jsr250/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/jsr250/introspect/impl/PolicyProcessorTestCaseFIXME.java b/branches/sca-equinox/modules/policy-security-jsr250/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/jsr250/introspect/impl/PolicyProcessorTestCaseFIXME.java index fc5d862449..e59f06bdf5 100644 --- a/branches/sca-equinox/modules/policy-security-jsr250/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/jsr250/introspect/impl/PolicyProcessorTestCaseFIXME.java +++ b/branches/sca-equinox/modules/policy-security-jsr250/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/policy/jsr250/introspect/impl/PolicyProcessorTestCaseFIXME.java @@ -31,14 +31,9 @@ import org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.OperationsConfigurator; import org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.DefaultJavaImplementationFactory; import org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.JavaImplementation; import org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.JavaImplementationFactory; -import org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.java.introspect.impl.ServiceProcessor; -import org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.java.DefaultJavaInterfaceFactory; -import org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.java.JavaInterface; -import org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.java.impl.PolicyJavaInterfaceVisitor; import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.DefaultPolicyFactory; import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.Intent; import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.PolicySetAttachPoint; -import org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.jsr250.introspect.impl.JSR250PolicyProcessor; import org.osoa.sca.annotations.Requires; import org.osoa.sca.annotations.Service; @@ -46,52 +41,38 @@ import org.osoa.sca.annotations.Service; * @version $Rev$ $Date$ */ public class PolicyProcessorTestCaseFIXME extends TestCase { - private ServiceProcessor serviceProcessor; private JSR250PolicyProcessor policyProcessor; - private PolicyJavaInterfaceVisitor visitor; private JavaImplementation type; // This actually is a test for PolicyJavaInterfaceProcessor. It will get // invoked via the call to ImplementationProcessorServiceImpl.createService in // ServiceProcessor. Of course ServiceProcessor class has to be working. public void stestSingleInterfaceWithIntentsOnInterfaceAtInterfaceLevel() throws Exception { - serviceProcessor.visitClass(Service1.class, type); - visitor.visitInterface((JavaInterface)type.getServices().get(0).getInterfaceContract().getInterface()); policyProcessor.visitClass(Service1.class, type); verifyIntents(Service1.class, type); } public void stestMultipleInterfacesWithIntentsOnInterfaceAtInterfaceLevel() throws Exception { - serviceProcessor.visitClass(Service2.class, type); - visitor.visitInterface((JavaInterface)type.getServices().get(0).getInterfaceContract().getInterface()); policyProcessor.visitClass(Service2.class, type); verifyIntents(Service2.class, type); } public void stestSingleInterfaceWithIntentsOnImplAtClassLevel() throws Exception { - serviceProcessor.visitClass(Service3.class, type); - visitor.visitInterface((JavaInterface)type.getServices().get(0).getInterfaceContract().getInterface()); policyProcessor.visitClass(Service3.class, type); verifyIntents(Service3.class, type); } public void stestMultipleInterfacesWithIntentsOnImplAtClassLevel() throws Exception { - serviceProcessor.visitClass(Service4.class, type); - visitor.visitInterface((JavaInterface)type.getServices().get(0).getInterfaceContract().getInterface()); policyProcessor.visitClass(Service4.class, type); verifyIntents(Service4.class, type); } public void stestSingleInterfaceWithIntentsOnInterfaceAtMethodLevel() throws Exception { - serviceProcessor.visitClass(Service5.class, type); - visitor.visitInterface((JavaInterface)type.getServices().get(0).getInterfaceContract().getInterface()); policyProcessor.visitClass(Service5.class, type); verifyIntents(Service5.class, type); } public void testSingleInterfaceWithIntentsOnServiceAndInterfaceAtImplAndInertfaceAndMethodLevel() throws Exception { - serviceProcessor.visitClass(Service6.class, type); - visitor.visitInterface((JavaInterface)type.getServices().get(0).getInterfaceContract().getInterface()); policyProcessor.visitClass(Service6.class, type); for (Method method : Service6.class.getDeclaredMethods()) { policyProcessor.visitMethod(method, type); @@ -236,9 +217,7 @@ public class PolicyProcessorTestCaseFIXME extends TestCase { @Override protected void setUp() throws Exception { super.setUp(); - serviceProcessor = new ServiceProcessor(new DefaultAssemblyFactory(), new DefaultJavaInterfaceFactory()); policyProcessor = new JSR250PolicyProcessor(new DefaultAssemblyFactory(), new DefaultPolicyFactory()); - visitor = new PolicyJavaInterfaceVisitor(new DefaultPolicyFactory()); JavaImplementationFactory javaImplementationFactory = new DefaultJavaImplementationFactory(); type = javaImplementationFactory.createJavaImplementation(); } |