mariadb/mysql-test/t/rpl_insert_id.test
guilhem@mysql.com a43c4b0265 Fix for BUG#20188 "REPLACE or ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE in
auto_increment breaks binlog":
if slave's table had a higher auto_increment counter than master's (even
though all rows of the two tables were identical), then in some cases,
REPLACE and INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE failed to replicate
statement-based (it inserted different values on slave from on master).
write_record() contained a "thd->next_insert_id=0" to force an adjustment
of thd->next_insert_id after the update or replacement. But it is this
assigment introduced indeterminism of the statement on the slave, thus
the bug. For ON DUPLICATE, we replace that assignment by a call to
handler::adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value() which is deterministic
(does not depend on slave table's autoinc counter). For REPLACE, this
assignment can simply be removed (as REPLACE can't insert a number larger
than thd->next_insert_id).
We also move a too early restore_auto_increment() down to when we really know
that we can restore the value.
2006-07-05 14:41:35 +02:00

11 lines
472 B
Text

#################################
# Wrapper for rpl_insert_id.test#
#################################
########################################################
# By JBM 2005-02-15 Wrapped to allow reuse of test code#
# Added to skip if ndb is default #
########################################################
-- source include/not_ndb_default.inc
-- source include/have_innodb.inc
let $engine_type=innodb;
-- source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_insert_id.test