mariadb/mysql-test/r/sp-threads.result
unknown c69e2fc7a8 Fix for bug #9486 "Can't perform multi-update in stored procedure".
New more SP-locking friendly approach to handling locks in multi-update.
Now we mark all tables of multi-update as needing write lock at parsing
stage and if possible downgrade lock at execution stage (For its work
SP-locking mechanism needs to know all lock types right after parsing
stage).


mysql-test/r/sp-threads.result:
  Added test for bug #9486 "Can't perform multi-update in stored procedure".
mysql-test/t/sp-threads.test:
  Added test for bug #9486 "Can't perform multi-update in stored procedure".
sql/sp_head.cc:
  SP_TABLE, sp_head::merge_table_list()/add_used_tables_to_table_list():
    Since some queries during their execution (e.g. multi-update)
    may change type of lock for some of their tables and thus change
    lock_type member for some of elements of table list, we should
    store type of lock in SP_TABLE struct explicitly instead of using
    lock_type member of TABLE_LIST object pointed by SP_TABLE::table.
sql/sql_lex.h:
  Removed no longer used LEX::multi_lock_option member.
sql/sql_prepare.cc:
  mysql_test_update():
    We don't need to bother about LEX::multi_lock_option if we convert
    multi-update to update anymore. Since nowdays multi-update uses 
    TABLE_LIST::lock_type for specifying lock level of updated tables
    instead of LEX::multi_lock_option.
sql/sql_update.cc:
  mysql_update()/mysql_multi_update_prepare():
   Now we mark all tables of multi-update as needing write lock at parsing
   stage and if possible downgrade lock at execution stage. Old approach
   (don't set lock type until execution stage) was not working well with
   SP-locking (For its work SP-locking mechanism needs to know all lock 
   types right after parsing stage).
  
  mysql_multi_update():
    We should return FALSE if no error occurs.
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
  update:
   Now we mark all tables of multi-update as needing write lock at parsing
   stage and if possible downgrade lock at execution stage. Old approach
   (don't set lock type until execution stage) was not working well with
   SP-locking (For its work SP-locking mechanism needs to know all lock 
   types right after parsing stage).
2005-04-15 20:31:47 +04:00

42 lines
939 B
Text

use test;
drop table if exists t1;
create table t1 (s1 int, s2 int, s3 int);
create procedure bug4934()
begin
insert into t1 values (1,0,1);
end//
use test;
call bug4934();
select * from t1;
s1 s2 s3
1 0 1
drop table t1;
create table t1 (s1 int, s2 int, s3 int);
drop procedure bug4934;
create procedure bug4934()
begin
end//
select * from t1;
s1 s2 s3
call bug4934();
select * from t1;
s1 s2 s3
drop table t1;
drop procedure bug4934;
drop procedure if exists bug9486;
drop table if exists t1, t2;
create table t1 (id1 int, val int);
create table t2 (id2 int);
create procedure bug9486()
update t1, t2 set val= 1 where id1=id2;
call bug9486();
lock tables t2 write;
call bug9486();
show processlist;
Id User Host db Command Time State Info
# root localhost test Sleep # NULL
# root localhost test Query # Locked call bug9486()
# root localhost test Query # NULL show processlist
unlock tables;
drop procedure bug9486;
drop table t1, t2;