mariadb/mysql-test/t/bug39022.test
Konstantin Osipov 8280fdd3c3 Committing on behalf or Dmitry Lenev:
Fix for bug #46947 "Embedded SELECT without FOR UPDATE is
causing a lock", with after-review fixes.

SELECT statements with subqueries referencing InnoDB tables
were acquiring shared locks on rows in these tables when they
were executed in REPEATABLE-READ mode and with statement or
mixed mode binary logging turned on.

This was a regression which were introduced when fixing
bug 39843.

The problem was that for tables belonging to subqueries
parser set TL_READ_DEFAULT as a lock type. In cases when
statement/mixed binary logging at open_tables() time this
type of lock was converted to TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock at
open_tables() time and caused InnoDB engine to acquire
shared locks on reads from these tables. Although in some
cases such behavior was correct (e.g. for subqueries in
DELETE) in case of SELECT it has caused unnecessary locking.

This patch tries to solve this problem by rethinking our
approach to how we handle locking for SELECT and subqueries.
Now we always set TL_READ_DEFAULT lock type for all cases
when we read data. When at open_tables() time this lock
is interpreted as TL_READ_NO_INSERT or TL_READ depending
on whether this statement as a whole or call to function
which uses particular table should be written to the
binary log or not (if yes then statement should be properly
serialized with concurrent statements and stronger lock
should be acquired).

Test coverage is added for both InnoDB and MyISAM.

This patch introduces an "incompatible" change in locking
scheme for subqueries used in SELECT ... FOR UPDATE and
SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE.
In 4.1 the server would use a snapshot InnoDB read for 
subqueries in SELECT FOR UPDATE and SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE
statements, regardless of whether the binary log is on or off.
If the user required a different type of read (i.e. locking read),
he/she could request so explicitly by providing FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE
clause for each individual subquery.
On of the patches for 5.0 broke this behaviour (which was not documented
or tested), and started to use locking reads fora all subqueries in SELECT ... 
FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE. This patch restored 4.1 behaviour.
2010-04-28 14:04:11 +04:00

63 lines
1.6 KiB
Text

-- source include/have_log_bin.inc
-- source include/have_innodb.inc
-- source include/not_binlog_format_row.inc
--echo #
--echo # Bug #39022: Mysql randomly crashing in lock_sec_rec_cons_read_sees
--echo #
CREATE TABLE t1(a TINYINT NOT NULL,b TINYINT,PRIMARY KEY(b)) ENGINE=innodb;
CREATE TABLE t2(d TINYINT NOT NULL,UNIQUE KEY(d)) ENGINE=innodb;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (13,0),(8,1),(9,2),(6,3),
(11,5),(11,6),(7,7),(7,8),(4,9),(6,10),(3,11),(11,12),
(12,13),(7,14);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10),
(11),(12),(13),(14);
connect (thread1, localhost, root,,);
connect (thread2, localhost, root,,);
connection thread1;
--echo # in thread1
START TRANSACTION;
connection thread2;
--echo # in thread2
REPLACE INTO t2 VALUES (-17);
SELECT d FROM t2,t1 WHERE d=(SELECT MAX(a) FROM t1 WHERE t1.a > t2.d) LOCK IN SHARE MODE;
connection thread1;
--echo # in thread1
REPLACE INTO t1(a,b) VALUES (67,20);
connection thread2;
--echo # in thread2
COMMIT;
START TRANSACTION;
REPLACE INTO t1(a,b) VALUES (65,-50);
REPLACE INTO t2 VALUES (-91);
send;
SELECT d FROM t2,t1 WHERE d=(SELECT MAX(a) FROM t1 WHERE t1.a > t2.d) LOCK IN SHARE MODE; #waits
connection thread1;
--echo # in thread1
--echo # should not crash
--error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
SELECT d FROM t2,t1 WHERE d=(SELECT MAX(a) FROM t1 WHERE t1.a > t2.d) LOCK IN SHARE MODE; #crashes
connection thread2;
--echo # in thread2
REAP;
disconnect thread2;
--source include/wait_until_disconnected.inc
connection thread1;
--echo # in thread1;
disconnect thread1;
--source include/wait_until_disconnected.inc
connection default;
DROP TABLE t1,t2;