- Adding a new class Item_args, represending regular function or
aggregate function arguments array.
- Adding a new class Item_func_or_sum,
a parent class for Item_func and Item_sum
- Moving Item_result_field::name() to Item_func_or_sum(),
as name() is not needed on Item_result_field level.
Fix MDL to report an error when a wait was killed, but preserve
the old documented behavior of GET_LOCK() where killing it is not an error.
Also remove race conditions in main.create_or_replace test
The test case tried to trigger a DEBUG_SYNC point at the end of a SELECT
SLEEP(5) statement. It did this by using EXECUTE 2, intending to trigger first
at the end of SET DEBUG_SYNC, and second at the end of the SELECT SLEEP(5).
However, in --ps-protocol mode, this does not work, because the SELECT is
executed in two steps (Prepare followed by Execute). Thus, the DEBUG_SYNC got
triggered too early, during the Prepare stage rather than Execute, and the
test case could race and information_schema.processlist see the thread in the
wrong state.
This patch fixes by changing the way the DEBUG_SYNC point is triggered. Now we
add a DBUG injection inside the code for SLEEP(5). This ensures that the
DEBUG_SYNC point is not activated until the SLEEP(5) is running, ensuring
that the following wait for completion will be effective.
CODE
Problem: UDF doesn't handle the arguments properly when they
are of string type due to a misplaced break.
The length of arguments is also not set properly
when the argument is NULL.
Solution: Fixed the code by putting the break at right place
and setting the argument length to zero when the
argument is NULL.
Issue :
-------
This seems for some platform -(LONGLONG_MIN) is
not flagged as out of range.
Fix:
----
Fix is backported from mysql-5.6 bug 14314156.
Fixed by adding an explicit test for this value in
Item_func_neg::int_op().
sql/item_func.cc:
For some platforms we need special handling of
LONGLONG_MIN to guarantee overflow.
Issue :
-------
This seems for some platform -(LONGLONG_MIN) is
not flagged as out of range.
Fix:
----
Fix is backported from mysql-5.6 bug 14314156.
Fixed by adding an explicit test for this value in
Item_func_neg::int_op().
AND IS_USED_LOCK().
Analysis:
-----------
In functions Item_func_is_free_lock::val_int() and
Item_func_is_used_lock::val_int(), for the specified user lock
name, pointer to its "User_level_lock" object is obtained from hash
"hash_user_locks". Mutex "LOCK_user_locks" is acquired for this
and released immediately. And we are accessing members of
User_level_lock after releasing the mutex. If same user lock is
deleted(released) from concurrent thread then accessing members
results in invalid(freed) memory access issue.
Deleting of user lock is also protected from the mutex
"LOCK_user_locks". Since this mutex is released in "val_int"
functions mentioned above, delete operation proceeds while concurrent
thread tries to access its members.
With the test case, valgrind reports invalid read issues in val_int
functions.
Fix:
-----------
To fix this issue, in "val_int" function of classes
"Item_func_is_free_lock" and "Item_func_is_used_lock", now releasing
mutex "LOCK_user_locks" after accessing User_level_lock members.
AND IS_USED_LOCK().
Analysis:
-----------
In functions Item_func_is_free_lock::val_int() and
Item_func_is_used_lock::val_int(), for the specified user lock
name, pointer to its "User_level_lock" object is obtained from hash
"hash_user_locks". Mutex "LOCK_user_locks" is acquired for this
and released immediately. And we are accessing members of
User_level_lock after releasing the mutex. If same user lock is
deleted(released) from concurrent thread then accessing members
results in invalid(freed) memory access issue.
Deleting of user lock is also protected from the mutex
"LOCK_user_locks". Since this mutex is released in "val_int"
functions mentioned above, delete operation proceeds while concurrent
thread tries to access its members.
With the test case, valgrind reports invalid read issues in val_int
functions.
Fix:
-----------
To fix this issue, in "val_int" function of classes
"Item_func_is_free_lock" and "Item_func_is_used_lock", now releasing
mutex "LOCK_user_locks" after accessing User_level_lock members.
Merged lp:maria/maria-10.0-galera up to revision 3879.
Added a new functions to handler API to forcefully abort_transaction,
producing fake_trx_id, get_checkpoint and set_checkpoint for XA. These
were added for future possiblity to add more storage engines that
could use galera replication.
MDEV-6099 Bad results for DATE_ADD(.., INTERVAL 2000000000000000000.0 SECOND)
MDEV-6097 Inconsistent results for CAST(int,decimal,double AS DATETIME)
MDEV-6100 No warning on CAST(9000000 AS TIME)
BREAKS RBR
Analysis:
--------
A table created using a query of the format:
CREATE TABLE t1 AS SELECT REPEAT('A',1000) DIV 1 AS a;
breaks the Row Based Replication.
The query above creates a table having a field of datatype
'bigint' with a display width of 3000 which is beyond the
maximum acceptable value of 255.
In the RBR mode, CREATE TABLE SELECT statement is
replicated as a combination of CREATE TABLE statement
equivalent to one the returned by SHOW CREATE TABLE and
row events for rows inserted. When this CREATE TABLE event
is executed on the slave, an error is reported:
Display width out of range for column 'a' (max = 255)
The following is the output of 'SHOW CREATE TABLE t1':
CREATE TABLE t1(`a` bigint(3000) DEFAULT NULL)
ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
The problem is due to the combination of two facts:
1) The above CREATE TABLE SELECT statement uses the display
width of the result of DIV operation as the display width
of the column created without validating the width for out
of bound condition.
2) The DIV operation incorrectly returns the length of its first
argument as the display width of its result; thus allowing
creation of a table with an incorrect display width of 3000
for the field.
Fix:
----
This fix changes the DIV operation implementation to correctly
evaluate the display width of its result. We check if DIV's
results estimated width crosses maximum width for integer
value (21) and if yes set it to this maximum value.
This patch also fixes fixes maximum display width evaluation
for DIV function when its first argument is in UCS2.
BREAKS RBR
Analysis:
--------
A table created using a query of the format:
CREATE TABLE t1 AS SELECT REPEAT('A',1000) DIV 1 AS a;
breaks the Row Based Replication.
The query above creates a table having a field of datatype
'bigint' with a display width of 3000 which is beyond the
maximum acceptable value of 255.
In the RBR mode, CREATE TABLE SELECT statement is
replicated as a combination of CREATE TABLE statement
equivalent to one the returned by SHOW CREATE TABLE and
row events for rows inserted. When this CREATE TABLE event
is executed on the slave, an error is reported:
Display width out of range for column 'a' (max = 255)
The following is the output of 'SHOW CREATE TABLE t1':
CREATE TABLE t1(`a` bigint(3000) DEFAULT NULL)
ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
The problem is due to the combination of two facts:
1) The above CREATE TABLE SELECT statement uses the display
width of the result of DIV operation as the display width
of the column created without validating the width for out
of bound condition.
2) The DIV operation incorrectly returns the length of its first
argument as the display width of its result; thus allowing
creation of a table with an incorrect display width of 3000
for the field.
Fix:
----
This fix changes the DIV operation implementation to correctly
evaluate the display width of its result. We check if DIV's
results estimated width crosses maximum width for integer
value (21) and if yes set it to this maximum value.
This patch also fixes fixes maximum display width evaluation
for DIV function when its first argument is in UCS2.
This is port of fix for MySQL BUG#17647863.
revno: 5572
revision-id: jon.hauglid@oracle.com-20131030232243-b0pw98oy72uka2sj
committer: Jon Olav Hauglid <jon.hauglid@oracle.com>
timestamp: Thu 2013-10-31 00:22:43 +0100
message:
Bug#17647863: MYSQL DOES NOT COMPILE ON OSX 10.9 GM
Rename test() macro to MY_TEST() to avoid conflict with libc++.
MDEV-4984: Implement MASTER_GTID_WAIT() and @@LAST_GTID.
MDEV-4726: Race in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_gtid_stop_start.test
MDEV-5636: Deadlock in RESET MASTER
MASTER_GTID_WAIT() is similar to MASTER_POS_WAIT(), but works with a
GTID position rather than an old-style filename/offset.
@@LAST_GTID gives the GTID assigned to the last transaction written
into the binlog.
Together, the two can be used by applications to obtain the GTID of
an update on the master, and then do a MASTER_GTID_WAIT() for that
position on any read slave where it is important to get results that
are caught up with the master at least to the point of the update.
The implementation of MASTER_GTID_WAIT() is implemented in a way
that tries to minimise the performance impact on the SQL threads,
even in the presense of many waiters on single GTID positions (as
from @@LAST_GTID).
Update InnoDB to 5.6.14
Apply MySQL-5.6 hack for MySQL Bug#16434374
Move Aria-only HA_RTREE_INDEX from my_base.h to maria_def.h (breaks an assert in InnoDB)
Fix InnoDB memory leak
