Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jon Olav Hauglid
ed928b14be Bug #57663 Concurrent statement using stored function and DROP DATABASE
breaks SBR

The problem was that DROP DATABASE ignored any metadata locks on stored
functions and procedures held by other connections. This made it
possible for DROP DATABASE to drop functions/procedures that were in use
by other connections and therefore break statement based replication.
(DROP DATABASE could appear in the binlog before a statement using a
dropped function/procedure.)

This problem was an issue left unresolved by the patch for Bug#30977
where metadata locks for stored functions/procedures were introduced.

This patch fixes the problem by making sure DROP DATABASE takes
exclusive metadata locks on all stored functions/procedures to be
dropped.

Test case added to sp-lock.test.
2010-11-17 15:37:23 +01:00
Dmitry Lenev
a6c00c276e Part of fix for bug#52044 "FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK and
FLUSH TABLES <list> WITH READ LOCK are incompatible" to
be pushed as separate patch.

Replaced thread state name "Waiting for table", which was
used by threads waiting for a metadata lock or table flush, 
with a set of names which better reflect types of resources
being waited for.

Also replaced "Table lock" thread state name, which was used 
by threads waiting on thr_lock.c table level lock, with more
elaborate "Waiting for table level lock", to make it 
more consistent with other thread state names.

Updated test cases and their results according to these 
changes.

Fixed sys_vars.query_cache_wlock_invalidate_func test to not
to wait for timeout of wait_condition.inc script.
2010-08-06 15:29:37 +04:00
Jon Olav Hauglid
b12af816d5 Additional test coverage for
Bug#30977 Concurrent statement using stored function and
          DROP FUNCTION breaks SBR
Bug#48246 assert in close_thread_table
2010-04-19 15:35:13 +02:00
Dmitry Lenev
236539b471 Implementation of simple deadlock detection for metadata locks.
This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters
conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible.

The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when
we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all
metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait
until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple
empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it
turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by
this transaction.

This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989
is not fully fixed in case of ALTER".

The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE
statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already
has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have
resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER
TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by
ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log
order as a consequence.

This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in
mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock
upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all
metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction
silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened.

We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all
locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were
acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them
by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple
deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be
done anyway for it.
2009-12-30 20:53:30 +03:00
Konstantin Osipov
3b311f399d Apply and review:
3655 Jon Olav Hauglid   2009-10-19
Bug #30977 Concurrent statement using stored function and DROP FUNCTION 
           breaks SBR
Bug #48246 assert in close_thread_table

Implement a fix for:
Bug #41804 purge stored procedure cache causes mysterious hang for many
           minutes
Bug #49972 Crash in prepared statements

The problem was that concurrent execution of DML statements that
use stored functions and DDL statements that drop/modify the same
function might result in incorrect binary log in statement (and
mixed) mode and therefore break replication.

This patch fixes the problem by introducing metadata locking for
stored procedures and functions. This is similar to what is done
in Bug#25144 for views. Procedures and functions now are
locked using metadata locks until the transaction is either
committed or rolled back. This prevents other statements from
modifying the procedure/function while it is being executed. This
provides commit ordering - guaranteeing serializability across
multiple transactions and thus fixes the reported binlog problem.

Note that we do not take locks for top-level CALLs. This means
that procedures called directly are not protected from changes by
simultaneous DDL operations so they are executed at the state they
had at the time of the CALL. By not taking locks for top-level
CALLs, we still allow transactions to be started inside
procedures.

This patch also changes stored procedure cache invalidation.
Upon a change of cache version, we no longer invalidate the entire
cache, but only those routines which we use, only when a statement
is executed that uses them.

This patch also changes the logic of prepared statement validation.
A stored procedure used by a prepared statement is now validated
only once a metadata lock has been acquired. A version mismatch
causes a flush of the obsolete routine from the cache and
statement reprepare.
Incompatible changes:
1) ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is reported for a transaction trying to access
   a procedure/function that is locked by a DDL operation in
   another connection.

2) Procedure/function DDL operations are now prohibited in LOCK
   TABLES mode as exclusive locks must be taken all at once and
   LOCK TABLES provides no way to specifiy procedures/functions to
   be locked.

Test cases have been added to sp-lock.test and rpl_sp.test.

Work on this bug has very much been a team effort and this patch
includes and is based on contributions from Davi Arnaut, Dmitry
Lenev, Magne Mæhre and Konstantin Osipov.
2009-12-29 15:19:05 +03:00