Commit graph

464 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marko Mäkelä
f3e2ac3067 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2013-01-21 15:19:18 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
9a0f3d3d53 Bug #16004999 ASSERT STATE == TRX_STATE_NOT_STARTED, UNLOCK_ROW()
Problem:

During the index intersect access method, the SQL layer will access one row,
that satisfies a set of conditions, using an index i1.  And then it will try to
access the same row, with other set of conditions using the next index i2.  If
the fetch from i2 fails (we are talking about an error situation here and not
simply an unmatched row situation), then it will unlock the row accessed via
i1.  This will work in all situations except deadlock error.

When a deadlock happens, InnoDB will rollback the transaction.  InnoDB intimates
the SQL layer about this through the THD::transaction_rollback_request member.
But this is not currently used by the SQL layer.

Solution:

When an error happens, the SQL layer must check the 
THD::transaction_rollback_request member, before calling handler::unlock_row().
We have also added a debug assert in ha_innobase::unlock_row() checking that
it must be called only when the transaction is in active state.

rb#1773 approved by Marko and Sunny.
2013-01-10 10:28:04 +05:30
Vasil Dimov
e8ec0212bb Merge mysql-5.1 -> mysql-5.5 2012-12-18 21:02:56 +02:00
Bill Qu
c3e918ea90 Approved by Jimmy and Inaam. rb#1576 2012-12-17 23:13:46 +08:00
Marko Mäkelä
c85f51f92a Follow-up fix to Bug#14628410: Remove the Windows InnoDB Plugin specific
implementation of innobase_mysql_tmpfile() from MySQL 5.5 onwards.
2012-12-13 17:12:21 +02:00
Satya Bodapati
bf42e842e5 Merge fix for Bug#14628410 from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2012-12-13 18:56:47 +05:30
Yasufumi Kinoshita
ddf518c567 Bug#59354 : Bug #12659252 : ASSERT !OTHER_LOCK AT LOCK_REC_ADD_TO_QUEUE DURING A DELETE OPERATION
The converted implicit lock should wait for the prior conflicting lock if found.

rb://1437 approved by Marko
2012-11-28 17:07:02 +09:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
8dd87e690d Bug#59354 : Bug #12659252 : ASSERT !OTHER_LOCK AT LOCK_REC_ADD_TO_QUEUE DURING A DELETE OPERATION
The converted implicit lock should wait for the prior conflicting lock if found.

rb://1437 approved by Marko
2012-11-28 17:05:23 +09:00
Marko Mäkelä
94897a6394 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-11-15 22:11:03 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
5a7553f36a Bug #14676111 WRONG PAGE_LEVEL WRITTEN FOR UPPER THAN FATHER PAGE AT BTR_LIFT_PAGE_UP()
btr_lift_page_up() writes wrong page number (different by -1) for upper than father page.
But in almost all of the cases, the father page should be root page, no upper
pages. It is very rare path.

In addition the leaf page should not be lifted unless the father page is root.
Because the branch pages should not become the leaf pages.

rb://1336 approved by Marko Makela.
2012-11-12 22:31:30 +09:00
Vasil Dimov
04195c30c1 This is a backport of "WL#5674 InnoDB: report all deadlocks (Bug#1784)"
from MySQL 5.6 into MySQL 5.5

Will close Bug#14515889 BACKPORT OF INNODB DEADLOCK LOGGING TO 5.5

The original implementation is in
vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20101213120811-k2ldtnao2t6zrxfn

Approved by:	Jimmy (rb:1535)
2012-11-12 14:24:43 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
51d01d7517 Bug #14676111 WRONG PAGE_LEVEL WRITTEN FOR UPPER THAN FATHER PAGE AT BTR_LIFT_PAGE_UP()
btr_lift_page_up() writes wrong page number (different by -1) for upper than father page.
But in almost all of the cases, the father page should be root page, no upper
pages. It is very rare path.

In addition the leaf page should not be lifted unless the father page is root.
Because the branch pages should not become the leaf pages.

rb://1336 approved by Marko Makela.
2012-11-12 22:33:40 +09:00
Marko Mäkelä
e5b11572bc Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-10-22 22:13:26 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
bb371b649d Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-10-16 14:35:19 +03:00
Annamalai Gurusami
378a7d1ef5 Bug #14036214 MYSQLD CRASHES WHEN EXECUTING UPDATE IN TRX WITH
CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION

A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot.  After 
the transaction is started new indexes are added to the 
table.  Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
chooses an index.  When the index scan is being initialized
via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports 
the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message 
stating that "insufficient history for index".

This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer.  But
the my_error() api is never called.  The statement level
diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error 
status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).  

Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
fails.

 516   case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
 517   default:
 518     DBUG_ASSERT(0);
 519     error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
 520     break;

The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652 
and 11746399. 

14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED

rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.
2012-10-08 19:40:30 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
6bbe24e9a0 Bug#14636528 INNODB CHANGE BUFFERING IS NOT ENTIRELY CRASH-SAFE
Delete-mark change buffer records when resorting to a pessimistic
delete from the change buffer B-tree. Skip delete-marked records in
the change buffer merge and when estimating whether an operation can
be buffered. Without this fix, we could try to apply the same buffered
changes multiple times if the server was killed at the right moment.

In MySQL 5.5 and later: ibuf_get_volume_buffered_count_func(): Ignore
delete-marked (already processed) records.

ibuf_delete_rec(): Add a crash point before optimistic delete. If the
optimistic delete fails, flag the record processed before
mtr_commit().

ibuf_merge_or_delete_for_page(): Ignore delete-marked (already
processed) records.

Backport to 5.1: Rename btr_cur_del_unmark_for_ibuf() to
btr_cur_set_deleted_flag_for_ibuf() and add a parameter.

rb:1307 approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-09-19 22:35:38 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
161a91d39f Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-09-19 22:55:26 +03:00
Jorgen Loland
816a8b5384 Bug#14547952: DEBUG BUILD FAILS ASSERTION IN RECORDS_IN_RANGE()
ha_innobase::records_in_range(): Remove a debug assertion
that prohibits an open range (full table).
This assertion catches unnecessary calls to this method, 
but such calls are not harming correctness.
2012-08-28 14:51:01 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
9d41d7c57b Bug #14500557 CRASH WHEN USING LONG INNODB INDEXES
The ha_innobase table handler contained two search key buffers
(srch_key_val1, srch_key_val2) of fixed size used to store the search
key.  The size of these buffers where fixed at
REC_VERSION_56_MAX_INDEX_COL_LEN + 2.  But this size is not sufficient
to hold the search key.  Hence the following assert in
row_sel_convert_mysql_key_to_innobase() failed.

2438                 /* Storing may use at most data_len bytes of buf */
2439 
2440                 if (UNIV_LIKELY(!is_null)) {
2441                         ut_a(buf + data_len <= original_buf + buf_len);
2442                         row_mysql_store_col_in_innobase_format(
2443                                 dfield, buf,
2444                                 FALSE, /* MySQL key value format col */
2445                                 key_ptr + data_offset, data_len,
2446                                 dict_table_is_comp(index->table));
2447                         buf += data_len;
2448                 }

The buffer size is now calculated with the formula
MAX_KEY_LENGTH + MAX_REF_PARTS*2.  This properly takes into account
the extra bytes needed to store the length for each column.  An index
can contain a maximum of MAX_REF_PARTS columns in it, and for each
column 2 bytes are needed to store length.  

rb://1238 approved by Marko and Vasil Dimov.
2012-09-04 14:33:56 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
3f0e739e3e Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-09-01 11:27:53 +05:30
Aditya A
30aadd6b41 Bug#14145950 AUTO_INCREMENT ON DOUBLE WILL FAIL ON WINDOWS
Backport from mysql-5.6 the fix
(revision-id sunny.bains@oracle.com-20120315045831-20rgfa4cozxmz7kz)

  Bug#13839886 - CRASH IN INNOBASE_NEXT_AUTOINC
  
  The assertion introduce in the fix for Bug#13817703 
  is too strong, a negative  number can be greater 
  than the column max value, when the column value is
  a negative number.
  
  rb://978 Approved by Jimmy Yang.

rb:1236 approved by Marko Makela
2012-08-27 15:42:11 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
1c6f78e337 Bug #13113026 INFORMATION_SCHEMA.INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE_LRUFROM 5.6 BACKPORT
Backporting the WL#5716, "Information schema table for InnoDB
buffer pool information". Backporting revisions 2876.244.113,
2876.244.102 from mysql-trunk.

rb://1177 approved by Jimmy Yang.
2012-07-25 10:48:16 +05:30
Jon Olav Hauglid
a47e778a61 Bug#12623923 Server can crash after failure to create
primary key with innodb tables

The bug was triggered if a single ALTER TABLE statement both
added and dropped indexes and ALTER TABLE failed during drop
(e.g. because the index was needed in a foreign key constraint).
In such cases, the server index information would get out of
sync with InnoDB - the added index would be present inside
InnoDB, but not in the server. This could then lead to InnoDB
error messages and/or server crashes.

The root cause is that new indexes are added before old indexes
are dropped. This means that if ALTER TABLE fails while dropping
indexes, index changes will be reverted in the server but not
inside InnoDB.

This patch fixes the problem by dropping any added indexes
if drop fails (for ALTER TABLE statements that both adds
and drops indexes). 

However, this won't work if we added a primary key as this
key might not be possible to drop inside InnoDB. Therefore,
we resort to the copy algorithm if a primary key is added
by an ALTER TABLE statement that also drops an index.

In 5.6 this bug is more properly fixed by the handler interface
changes done in the scope of WL#5534 "Online ALTER".
2012-07-10 16:13:02 +02:00
Jon Olav Hauglid
66ef5b0d48 Bug#14238406 NEW COMPILATION WARNINGS WITH GCC 4.7 (-WERROR=NARROWING)
Manual merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5
2012-06-29 13:36:01 +02:00
Jon Olav Hauglid
1ede2dd814 Bug#14238406 NEW COMPILATION WARNINGS WITH GCC 4.7 (-WERROR=NARROWING)
This patch fixes various compilation warnings of the type
"error: narrowing conversion of 'x' from 'datatype1' to
'datatype2'
2012-06-29 13:25:57 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
a28a2ca798 Bug #13933132: [ERROR] GOT ERROR -1 WHEN READING TABLE APPEARED
WHEN KILLING

Suppose there is a query waiting for a lock.  If the user kills
this query, then "Got error -1 when reading table" error message
must not be logged in the server log file.  Since this is a user
requested interruption, no spurious error message must be logged
in the server log.  This patch will remove the error message from
the log.

approved by joh and tatjana
2012-06-01 14:12:57 +05:30
Jon Olav Hauglid
1c0388a5be Bug#13982017: ALTER TABLE RENAME ENDS UP WITH ERROR 1050 (42S01)
Fixed by backport of:
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 3402.50.156
    committer: Jon Olav Hauglid <jon.hauglid@oracle.com>
    branch nick: mysql-trunk-test
    timestamp: Wed 2012-02-08 14:10:23 +0100
    message:
      Bug#13417754 ASSERT IN ROW_DROP_DATABASE_FOR_MYSQL DURING DROP SCHEMA
      
      This assert could be triggered if an InnoDB table was being moved
      to a different database using ALTER TABLE ... RENAME, while this
      database concurrently was being dropped by DROP DATABASE.
      
      The reason for the problem was that no metadata lock was taken
      on the target database by ALTER TABLE ... RENAME.
      DROP DATABASE was therefore not blocked and could remove
      the database while ALTER TABLE ... RENAME was executing. This
      could cause the assert in InnoDB to be triggered.
      
      This patch fixes the problem by taking a IX metadata lock on
      the target database before ALTER TABLE ... RENAME starts
      moving a table to a different database.
      
      Note that this problem did not occur with RENAME TABLE which
      already takes the correct metadata locks.
      
      Also note that this patch slightly changes the behavior of
      ALTER TABLE ... RENAME. Before, the statement would abort and
      return an error if a lock on the target table name could not
      be taken immediately. With this patch, ALTER TABLE ... RENAME
      will instead block and wait until the lock can be taken 
      (or until we get a lock timeout). This also means that it is
      possible to get ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK errors in this situation
      since we allow ALTER TABLE ... RENAME to wait and not just
      abort immediately.
2012-06-01 09:31:24 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
4acca3431f Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-06-01 11:49:07 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
a2bc9b3669 Bug #13933132: [ERROR] GOT ERROR -1 WHEN READING TABLE APPEARED
WHEN KILLING

Suppose there is a query waiting for a lock.  If the user kills
this query, then "Got error -1 when reading table" error message
must not be logged in the server log file.  Since this is a user
requested interruption, no spurious error message must be logged
in the server log.  This patch will remove the error message from
the log.

approved by joh and tatjana
2012-05-30 10:05:04 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
31a6bcbee4 Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-05-16 16:33:22 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
326b40c9c8 Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-05-10 10:33:16 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
391ea219c2 Bug #14007649 65111: INNODB SOMETIMES FAILS TO UPDATE ROWS INSERTED
BY A CONCURRENT TRANSACTIO

The member function QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::init_ror_merged_scan() performs
a table handler clone. Innodb does not provide a clone operation.  
The ha_innobase::clone() is not there. The handler::clone() does not 
take care of the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type.  Because of 
this what happens is that for one index we do a locking read, and 
for the other index we were doing a non-locking (consistent) read. 
The patch introduces ha_innobase::clone() member function.  
It is implemented similar to ha_myisam::clone().  It calls the 
base class handler::clone() and then does any additional operation 
required.  I am setting the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type 
correctly. 

rb://1060 approved by Marko
2012-05-10 10:18:31 +05:30
Joerg Bruehe
5be07ceadd Merge 5.5.24 back into main 5.5.
This is a weave merge, but without any conflicts.
In 14 source files, the copyright year needed to be updated to 2012.
2012-05-07 22:20:42 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
96b62513f6 Bug#11758510 (#50723): INNODB CHECK TABLE FATAL SEMAPHORE WAIT TIMEOUT POSSIBLY TOO SHORT FOR BI
Fixed not to check timeout during the check table.
2012-04-27 19:40:12 +09:00
Georgi Kodinov
7fa28bcf56 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-04-10 14:23:17 +03:00
Sergey Glukhov
ea1b0492a0 5.1-security -> 5.5-security merge 2012-04-04 14:19:00 +04:00
Sergey Glukhov
b5c690aa54 Bug#11766300 59387: FAILING ASSERTION: CURSOR->POS_STATE == 1997660512 (BTR_PCUR_IS_POSITIONE
Bug#13639204 64111: CRASH ON SELECT SUBQUERY WITH NON UNIQUE INDEX
The crash happened due to wrong calculation
of key length during creation of reference for
sort order index. The problem is that
keyuse->used_tables can have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT enabled
but used_tables parameter(create_ref_for_key() func) does
not have it. So key parts which have OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT
are ommited and it could lead to incorrect key length
calculation(zero key length).


mysql-test/r/subselect_innodb.result:
  test result
mysql-test/t/subselect_innodb.test:
  test case
sql/sql_select.cc:
  added OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT to the used_tables parameter
  for create_ref_for_key() function.
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
  added assertion, request from Inno team
storage/innodb_plugin/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
  added assertion, request from Inno team
2012-04-04 13:29:45 +04:00
Sunny Bains
d1809a5c85 Bug #13817703 - auto_increment_offset != 1 + innodb_autoinc_lock_mode=1 => bulk inserts fail
Fix the calculation of the next autoinc value when offset > 1. Some of the
results have changed due to the changes in the allocation calculation. The
new calculation will result in slightly bigger gaps for bulk inserts.
  
rb://866 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
Backported from mysql-trunk (5.6)
2012-03-29 18:02:08 +11:00
Georgi Kodinov
5bf1a28915 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-03-21 14:56:29 +02:00
Inaam Rana
1ca73ab435 merge from 5.1 2012-03-15 12:45:24 -04:00
Georgi Kodinov
9c366f7921 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-03-08 17:19:54 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
7e36c4bdb0 Bug#13635833: MULTIPLE CRASHES IN FOREIGN KEY CODE WITH CONCURRENT DDL/DML
There are two threads.  In one thread, dml operation is going on 
involving cascaded update operation.  In another thread, alter 
table add foreign key constraint is happening.  Under these 
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a 
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.  
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.  
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of 
newly added assert).  With fix, the alter table stmt will return 
an error message.  
      
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1

rb:961
rb:947
2012-03-01 11:05:51 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
8235c4e161 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-02-28 14:04:21 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
c1615df32c Bug#13635833: MULTIPLE CRASHES IN FOREIGN KEY CODE WITH CONCURRENT DDL/DML
There are two threads.  In one thread, dml operation is going on 
involving cascaded update operation.  In another thread, alter 
table add foreign key constraint is happening.  Under these 
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a 
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.  
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.  
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of 
newly added assert).  With fix, the alter table stmt will return 
an error message.  
      
rb:947
approved by Jimmy Yang
2012-02-27 17:23:56 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
6ff320e0f6 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-02-16 12:28:49 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
56e3f68c72 Merge mysql-5.1 -> mysql-5.5
The actual Bug#11754376 does not exist in MySQL 5.5 because at startup
we drop entries for temporary tables from InnoDB dictionary cache (only
if ROW_FORMAT is not REDUNDANT). But nevertheless the bug in
normalize_table_name_low() is present so we fix it.
2012-02-06 13:00:41 +02:00
Vasil Dimov
1c4fd3bb54 Fix Bug#11754376 45976: INNODB LOST FILES FOR TEMPORARY TABLES ON
GRACEFUL SHUTDOWN

During startup mysql picks up .frm files from the tmpdir directory and
tries to drop those tables in the storage engine.

The problem is that when tmpdir ends in / then ha_innobase::delete_table()
is passed a string like "/var/tmp//#sql123", then it wrongly normalizes it
to "/#sql123" and calls row_drop_table_for_mysql() which of course fails
to delete the table entry from the InnoDB dictionary cache.
ha_innobase::delete_table() returns an error but nevertheless mysql wipes
away the .frm file and the entry in the InnoDB dictionary cache remains
orphaned with no easy way to remove it.

The "no easy" way to remove it is to create a similar temporary table again,
copy its .frm file to tmpdir under "#sql123.frm" and restart mysqld with
tmpdir=/var/tmp (no trailing slash) - this way mysql will pick the .frm file
after restart and will try to issue drop table for "/var/tmp/#sql123"
(notice do double slash), ha_innobase::delete_table() will normalize it to
"tmp/#sql123" and row_drop_table_for_mysql() will successfully remove the
table entry from the dictionary cache.

The solution is to fix normalize_table_name_low() to normalize things like
"/var/tmp//table" correctly to "tmp/table".

This patch also adds a test function which invokes
normalize_table_name_low() with various inputs to make sure it works
correctly and a mtr test that calls this test function.

Reviewed by:	Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/929/)
2012-02-06 12:44:59 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
1fbbacfea5 ha_innobase::records_in_range(): Remove a debug assertion
that prohibits an open range (full table).
This assertion catches unnecessary calls to this method, but such calls
are not harming correctness.
2012-02-02 13:54:27 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
d9aeddf76a Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-01-16 10:30:51 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
020f3914a2 Bug #11765438 58406:
ISSUES WITH COPYING PARTITIONED INNODB TABLES FROM LINUX TO WINDOWS

This problem was already fixed in mysql-trunk as part of bug #11755924.  I am 
backporting the fix to mysql-5.1.
2012-01-16 09:58:31 +05:30