An "ITERATE innerLoop" did not work properly inside
a WHILE loop, which itself is inside an outer FOR loop:
outerLoop:
FOR
...
innerLoop:
WHILE
...
ITERATE innerLoop;
...
END WHILE;
...
END FOR;
It erroneously generated an integer increment code for the outer FOR loop.
There were two problems:
1. "ITERATE innerLoop" worked like "ITERATE outerLoop"
2. It was always integer increment, even in case of FOR cursor loops.
Background:
- A FOR loop automatically creates a dedicated sp_pcontext stack entry,
to put the iteration and bound variables on it.
- Other loop types (LOOP, WHILE, REPEAT), do not generate a dedicated
slack entry.
The old code erroneously assumed that sp_pcontext::m_for_loop
either describes the most inner loop (in case the inner loop is FOR),
or is empty (in case the inner loop is not FOR).
But in fact, sp_pcontext::m_for_loop is never empty inside a FOR loop:
it describes the closest FOR loop, even if this FOR loop has nested
non-FOR loops inside.
So when we're near the ITERATE statement in the above script,
sp_pcontext::m_for_loop is not empty - it stores information about
the FOR loop labeled as "outrLoop:".
Fix:
- Adding a new member sp_pcontext::Lex_for_loop::m_start_label,
to remember the explicit or the auto-generated label correspoding
to the start of the FOR body. It's used during generation
of "ITERATE loop_label" code to check if "loop_label" belongs
to the current FOR loop pointed by sp_pcontext::m_for_loop,
or belongs to a non-FOR nested loop.
- Adding LEX methods sp_for_loop_intrange_iterate() and
sp_for_loop_cursor_iterate() to reuse the code between
methods handling:
* ITERATE
* END FOR
- Adding a test for Lex_for_loop::is_for_loop_cursor()
and generate a code either a cursor fetch, or for an integer increment.
Before this change, it always erroneously generated an integer increment
version.
- Cleanup: Initialize Lex_for_loop_st::m_cursor_offset inside
Lex_for_loop_st::init(), to avoid not initialized members.
- Cleanup: Removing a redundant method:
Lex_for_loop_st::init(const Lex_for_loop_st &other)
Using Lex_for_loop_st::operator(const Lex_for_loop_st &other) instead.
