disable bulk insert optimization if long uniques are used, because they
need to read the table (index_read) after every inserted now. And bulk
insert optimization might disable indexes.
bulk insert is already disabled in other cases when there are chances
that the table will be read duing the bulk insert.
Problem:-
We are able to insert duplicate value in table because cmp_binary_offset
is not able to differentiate between NULL and empty string. So
check_duplicate_long_entry_key is never called and we don't check for
duplicate.
Solution
Added a if condition with is_null() on field which can differentiate
between NULL and empty string.
Handler for existing partition was already index-inited at the
beginning of copy_partitions().
In the case of REORGANIZE PARTITION we fill new partition by calling
its ha_write_row() (handler is storage engine of new partition). From
that we go through the below conditions:
if (this->inited == RND)
table->clone_handler_for_update();
handler *h= table->update_handler ? table->update_handler : table->file;
First, the above misses the meaning of this->inited check. Now it is
new partition and this handler is not inited. So, we assign
table->file which is ha_partition and is really not known to be inited
or not. It is supposed (this == table->file), otherwise we are
out of the logic for using update_handler. This patch adds DBUG_ASSERT
for that.
Second, we call check_duplicate_long_entries() for table->file and
that calls ha_partition::index_init() which calls index_init() for
each partition's handler. But the existing parititions' handlers was
already inited in copy_partitions() and we fail on assertion.
The fix implies that we don't need check_duplicate_long_entries()
per-partition as we've already done check_duplicate_long_entries() for
ha_partition. For REORGANIZE PARTITION that means existing row was
already checked at previous INSERT/UPDATE commands, so no need to
check it again (see NOTE in handler::ha_write_row()).
The fix also optimizes ha_update_row() so
check_duplicate_long_entries_update() is not called per-partition
considering it was already called for ha_partition. Besides,
per-partition duplicate check is not really usable.
Long UNIQUE HASH index silently creates virtual column index, which should
be impossible for base columns featuring AUTO_INCREMENT.
Fix: add a relevant check; add new vcol type for a prettier error message.
Problem:- Calling mark_columns_per_binlog_row_image() earlier may change the
result of mark_virtual_columns_for_write() , Since it can set the bitmap on
for virtual column, and henceforth mark_virtual_column_deps(field) will
never be called in mark_virtual_column_with_deps.
This bug is not specific for long unique, It also fails for this case
create table t2(id int primary key, a blob, b varchar(20) as (LEFT(a,2)));
Problem:-
So the issue is when we do bulk insert with rows
> MI_MIN_ROWS_TO_DISABLE_INDEXES(100) , We try to disable the indexes to
speedup insert. But current logic also disables the long unique indexes.
Solution:- In ha_myisam::start_bulk_insert if we find long hash index
(HA_KEY_ALG_LONG_HASH) we will not disable the index.
This commit also refactors the mi_disable_indexes_for_rebuild function,
Since this is function is called at only one place, it is inlined into
start_bulk_insert
mi_clear_key_active is added into myisamdef.h because now it is also used
in ha_myisam.cc file.
(Same is done for Aria Storage engine)
attempt to drop BLOB with long index
Restore long table->key_info, So that in the case of unsuccessful table
alter table->key_info should have a correct value. In the case of successful
table alter old table is flushed so that is why we don't see this error in
the case of successful alter.
* update system versioning fields before generaled columns
* don't presume that ha_write_row() means INSERT. It could still be UPDATE
* use the correct handler in check_duplicate_long_entry_key()
close table->update_handler in close_thread_tables().
it's not enough to do it in sql_update.cc only, because
sql_insert.cc can also do updates (REPLACE) and even
sql_delete.cc can (DELETE ... FOR PORTION OF)
when auto-adding a virtual LONG_UNIQUE_HASH_FIELD, fill in
a Virtual_column_info for it, so that fill_alter_inplace_info()
would know we're adding a virtual field (ALTER_ADD_VIRTUAL_COLUMN).
