- Modify the way Item_cond::fix_fields() and Item_cond::eval_not_null_tables()
calculate bitmap for Item_cond_or::not_null_tables():
if they see a "... OR inexpensive_const_false_item OR ..." then the item can
be ignored.
- Updated test results. There can be more warnings produced since parts of WHERE
are evaluated more times.
from MariaDB 10.0.
The bug in mdev-3948 was an instance of the problem fixed by Sergey's patch
in 10.0 - namely that the range optimizer could change table->[read | write]_set,
and not restore it.
revno: 3471
committer: Sergey Petrunya <psergey@askmonty.org>
branch nick: 10.0-serg-fix-imerge
timestamp: Sat 2012-11-03 12:24:36 +0400
message:
# MDEV-3817: Wrong result with index_merge+index_merge_intersection, InnoDB table, join, AND and OR conditions
Reconcile the fixes from:
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20110805143029-ywrzuz15uzgontr0
# Fix for BUG#12698916 - "JOIN QUERY GIVES WRONG RESULT AT 2ND EXEC. OR
# AFTER FLUSH TABLES [-INT VS NULL]"
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20111209150650-tzx3ldzxe1yfwji6
# Fix for BUG#12912171 - ASSERTION FAILED: QUICK->HEAD->READ_SET == SAVE_READ_SET
# and
#
and related fixes from: BUG#1006164, MDEV-376:
Now, ROR-merged QUICK_RANGE_SELECT objects make no assumptions about the values
of table->read_set and table->write_set.
Each QUICK_ROR_SELECT has (and had before) its own column bitmap, but now, all
QUICK_ROR_SELECT's functions that care: reset(), init_ror_merged_scan(), and
get_next() will set table->read_set when invoked and restore it back to what
it was before the call before they return.
This allows to avoid the mess when somebody else modifies table->read_set for
some reason.
The bug happened because in some cases the function JOIN::exec
did not save the value of TABLE::pre_idx_push_select_cond in
TABLE::select->pre_idx_push_select_cond for the sort table.
Noticed and fixed a bug in the function make_cond_remainder
that builds the remainder condition after extraction of an index
pushdown condition from the where condition. The code
erroneously assumed that the function make_cond_for_table left
the value of ICP_COND_USES_INDEX_ONLY in sub-condition markers.
Adjusted many result files from the regression test suite
after this fix .
sql/sql_insert.cc:
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
******
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
sql/sql_table.cc:
small cleanup
******
small cleanup
of the 5.3 code line after a merge with 5.2 on 2010-10-28
in order not to allow the cost to access a joined table to be equal
to 0 ever.
Expanded data sets for many test cases to get the same execution plans
as before.
revno: 2876.47.174
revision-id: jorgen.loland@oracle.com-20110519120355-qn7eprkad9jqwu5j
parent: mayank.prasad@oracle.com-20110518143645-bdxv4udzrmqsjmhq
committer: Jorgen Loland <jorgen.loland@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-trunk-11765831
timestamp: Thu 2011-05-19 14:03:55 +0200
message:
BUG#11765831: 'RANGE ACCESS' MAY INCORRECTLY FILTER
AWAY QUALIFYING ROWS
The problem was that the ranges created when OR'ing two
conditions could be incorrect. Without the bugfix,
"I <> 6 OR (I <> 8 AND J = 5)" would create these ranges:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I < 8",
"8 <= I <= 8 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"8 < I"
While the correct ranges is
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I"
The problem occurs when key_or() ORs
(1) "NULL < I < 6, 6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5, 6 < I" with
(2) "8 < I AND 5 <= J <= 5"
The reason for the bug is that in key_or(), SEL_ARG *tmp is
used to point to the range in (1) above that is merged with
(2) while key1 points to the root of the red-black tree of
(1). When merging (1) and (2), tmp refers to the "6 < I"
part whereas the root is the "6 <= ... AND 5 <= J <= 5" part.
key_or() decides that the tmp range needs to be split into
"6 < I < 8, 8 <= I <= 8, 8 < I", in which next_key_part of the
second range should be that of tmp. However, next_key_part is
set to key1->next_key_part ("5 <= J <= 5") instead of
tmp->next_key_part (empty). Fixing this gives the correct but
not optimal ranges:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I < 8",
"8 <= I <= 8",
"8 < I"
A second problem can be seen above: key_or() may create
adjacent ranges that could be replaced with a single range.
Fixes for this is also included in the patch so that the range
above becomes correct AND optimal:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I"
Merging adjacent ranges like this gives a slightly lower cost
estimate for the range access.
- Set the default
- Adjust the testcases so that 'new' tests are run with optimizations turned on.
- Pull out relevant tests from "irrelevant" tests and run them with optimizations on.
- Run range.test and innodb.test with both mrr=on and mrr=off
