The method Item_func_isnull::update_used_tables() erroneously did not
update cached values stored in the fields used_tables_cache and
const_item_cache of the Item_func_isnull objects. As a result the
Item_func_isnull::used_tables() returned wrong bitmaps and, as a
consequence, push-down predicates could be attached to wrong tables.
- Replaced old DBUG_ASSERT with a new correct one + a comment.
storage/maria/ma_pagecache.c:
Replaced old DBUG_ASSERT with a new correct one + a comment.
This fixes a bug that when you use mysqldump --no-create-info to generate a dump that you want to merge with an existing table,
you can get an innodb table with duplicated unique keys.
Patch orignally by Eric Bergen.
client/mysqldump.c:
Only use UNIQUE_CHECKS=0 for tables that are created.
This solves the issue that you can't get duplicate unique keys when merging two dumps.
mysql-test/r/mysqldump.result:
Test for mysqldump --no-create-info
Identified all test cases in the MySQL file subquery_mat.inc that are
not present in MariaDB. In total found 8 test cases for the following
MySQL bugs:
* BUG#49630 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case
* BUG#52538 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case (checked with VG)
* BUG#53103 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case
* BUG#54511 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case
* BUG#56367 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case
* BUG#59833 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case
* BUG#11852644 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case
* BUG#12668294 - not a bug in MariaDB, added test case
All of these MySQL bugs are not present in MariaDB 5.3.
The comparison was based on the following version of
mysql-trunk:
revno: 3350 [merge]
committer: Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-trunk
timestamp: Mon 2011-08-08 12:42:09 +0300
message:
Merge mysql-5.5 to mysql-trunk.
This bug is a special case of lp:813447.
Analysis:
Constant optimization finds that the condition t2.a = 1
can be used to access the primary key of table 't2'. As
a result both outer table t1,t2 are considered as constant
when we reach the execution phase. At the same time, during
constant optimization, the IN predicate is not evaluated
because it is expensive.
When execution of the outer query reaches do_select(),
control flow enter the branch:
if (join->table_count == join->const_tables)
{ ... }
This branch checks only the WHERE and HAVING clauses,
but doesn't check the ON clauses of the query. Since the
IN predicate was not evaluated during optimization, it is
not evaluated at all, thus execution doesn't detect that
the ON clause is FALSE.
Solution:
Similar to the patch for bug lp:813447, exclude system
tables from constant substitution based on unique key
lookups if there is an expensive ON condition on the
inner table.
- create_ref_for_key() has the code that walks KEYUSE array and tries to use
maximum number of keyparts for ref (and eq_ref and ref_or_null) access.
When one constructs ref access for table that is inside a SJ-Materialization
nest, it is not possible to use tables that are ouside the nest (because
materialization is performed before they have any "current value").
The bug was caused by this function not taking this into account.
The reason for the long shutdown is hanging in io threads. It appears
that just closing completion port on XP does not necessarily signal
thread waiting in GetIOCompletionStatus() (even if this works fine
on later Windows versions)
The fix is to wakeup background threads using PostQueuedCompletionStatus()
with a special 'key' parameter indicating shutdown.
The reason for the crash is Innodb assertion after trying to load condition variables function
dynamically and not finding them
The fix is to skip dynamic loading if srv_use_native_conditions is FALSE. srv_use_native_conditions
is derived from Windows version and would be FALSE on XP and TRUE on later Windows.
This is the same handling as in MySQL 5.. In Maria 5.3 srv_use_native_conditions check was
presumably lost in the downporting.
storage/maria/ma_blockrec.c:
Unlock bitmaps earlier (no reason to have them unlocked over _ma_write_clr())
storage/maria/ma_extra.c:
Don't lock THR_LOCK_maria for HA_EXTRA_PREPARE_FOR_RENAME (upper level ensures that we are not opening the same table during this call)
We don't need to have share->intern_lock locked over _ma_flush_table_files()
storage/maria/ma_open.c:
Update comment
revno: 2876.47.174
revision-id: jorgen.loland@oracle.com-20110519120355-qn7eprkad9jqwu5j
parent: mayank.prasad@oracle.com-20110518143645-bdxv4udzrmqsjmhq
committer: Jorgen Loland <jorgen.loland@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-trunk-11765831
timestamp: Thu 2011-05-19 14:03:55 +0200
message:
BUG#11765831: 'RANGE ACCESS' MAY INCORRECTLY FILTER
AWAY QUALIFYING ROWS
The problem was that the ranges created when OR'ing two
conditions could be incorrect. Without the bugfix,
"I <> 6 OR (I <> 8 AND J = 5)" would create these ranges:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I < 8",
"8 <= I <= 8 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"8 < I"
While the correct ranges is
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I"
The problem occurs when key_or() ORs
(1) "NULL < I < 6, 6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5, 6 < I" with
(2) "8 < I AND 5 <= J <= 5"
The reason for the bug is that in key_or(), SEL_ARG *tmp is
used to point to the range in (1) above that is merged with
(2) while key1 points to the root of the red-black tree of
(1). When merging (1) and (2), tmp refers to the "6 < I"
part whereas the root is the "6 <= ... AND 5 <= J <= 5" part.
key_or() decides that the tmp range needs to be split into
"6 < I < 8, 8 <= I <= 8, 8 < I", in which next_key_part of the
second range should be that of tmp. However, next_key_part is
set to key1->next_key_part ("5 <= J <= 5") instead of
tmp->next_key_part (empty). Fixing this gives the correct but
not optimal ranges:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I < 8",
"8 <= I <= 8",
"8 < I"
A second problem can be seen above: key_or() may create
adjacent ranges that could be replaced with a single range.
Fixes for this is also included in the patch so that the range
above becomes correct AND optimal:
"NULL < I < 6",
"6 <= I <= 6 AND 5 <= J <= 5",
"6 < I"
Merging adjacent ranges like this gives a slightly lower cost
estimate for the range access.
Problem was the parsing of test suite files for various tags and options.
This was done inefficiently, and include files were re-parsed for every
place they were included. This caused a delay of 20 seconds or so before
the first test started to run.
By parsing more efficiently and re-using first parse for subsequent
inclusion of the same file, time spent parsing is reduced to less than
1 second, and start appears instantaneous.
(With this patch, full ./mtr runs in 3 minutes on my laptop (release
build.)
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/t/innodb_bug52663.test:
Test is fairly slow, so try to avoid getting stuck with it at the end
while other workers are idle.
This problem could be observed for queries with nested outer joins
for which the not_exist optimization were applicable.
The problem was caused by the code of the patch for bug #49322
that erroneously forced the return to the previous nested loop
level when the join algorithm successfully builds a partial record
for an embedded outer to which the not_exist optimization could be
applied.
Actually the immediate return to the previous nested loops level
is correct only if this partial record is rejected by a predicate
pushed down to one of the inner tables of this outer join. Otherwise
attempts to find extensions of this record must be made.
sql/sql_expression_cache.cc:
Do not go on disk if hit rate is not good.
Local hit/miss counters added.
sql/sql_expression_cache.h:
Local hit/miss counters added.
Fixed lp:814237: Wrong mutex usage in Aria
storage/maria/ma_bitmap.c:
Added call to _ma_bitmap_mark_file_changed() when flushing bitmap. This fixes lp:814237
The bug happens when one uses MAX_ROWS=# with Aria & row_format=page and one insert more than # rows.
mysql-test/mysql-test-run.pl:
Ignore table is full error messages
mysql-test/suite/maria/r/max_length.result:
Test case for 'Table is full'
mysql-test/suite/maria/t/max_length.test:
Test case for 'Table is full'
storage/maria/ma_bitmap.c:
Ensure that we don't allocate bits outside of max_data_file_size.
Adjust max_data_file_size based on bitmap alignments.
Backport fix to adjust wrong first_bitmap_with_space.
storage/maria/ma_blockrec.c:
Calculate value of max_data_file_length
storage/maria/ma_blockrec.h:
Updated prototype for _ma_bitmap_init()
storage/maria/ma_check.c:
Give warnings if file sizes are above max file sizes.
Give more warnings in case of errors.
Have maria_chk write if table is recreated.
storage/maria/ma_create.c:
Better calculation of max_data_file_length and thus data pointer length.
Fixes some wrong pointer lengths when using MAX_ROWS=#
storage/maria/ma_open.c:
Removed duplicate assigment.
Use block size from file instead of global variable.
storage/maria/maria_chk.c:
Remove -1 from printed file length
storage/maria/maria_def.h:
Update struct st_maria_file_bitmap
In case of two views with subqueries it is dificult to decide about order of injected ORDER BY clauses.
A simple solution is just prohibit ORDER BY injection if there is other order by.
mysql-test/r/view.result:
New test added, old test changed.
mysql-test/t/view.test:
New test aded.
sql/share/errmsg.txt:
new warning added.
sql/sql_view.cc:
Inject ORDER BY only if there is no other one.
Warning about ignoring ORDER BY in this case for EXPLAIN EXTENDED.
There are 2 volatile condition constructions AND/OR constructions and fields(references) when first
good supported to be top elements of conditions because it is normal practice
(see copy_andor_structure for example) fields without any expression in the condition is really rare
and mostly useless case however it could lead to problems when optimiser changes/moves them unaware
of other variables referring to them. An easy solution of this problem is just to replace single field
in a condition with equivalent expression well supported by the server (<field> -> <field> != 0).
mysql-test/r/view.result:
New test added.
mysql-test/t/view.test:
New test added.
sql/sql_parse.cc:
<field> -> <field> != 0
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
<field> -> <field> != 0
An aggregating query over an empty set of a join of two tables
with a rejecting HAVING clause erroneously could return a row.
It could happen in the cases when the optimizer made a conclusion
that the aggregating set was empty.
Wrong results were produced because the server missed initial
setting for aggregation functions in the mentioned cases.
The function matching_cond should take into account that
there may be always false constant conjunctive conditions
that has not been evaluated yet,for example, conjunctive
conditions with non-correlated subqueries.
ALL subquery should return TRUE if subquery rowa set is empty independently
of left part. The problem was that Item_func_(eq,ne,gt,ge,lt,le) do not
call execution of second argument if first is NULL no in this case subquery
will not be executed and when Item_func_not_all calls any_value() of the
subquery or aggregation function which report that there was rows. So for
NULL < ALL (SELECT...) result was FALSE instead of TRUE.
Fix is just swapping of arguments of Item_func_(eq,ne,gt,ge,lt,le) (with
changing the operation if it is needed) so that result will be the same
(for examole a < b is equal to b > a). This fix exploit the fact that
first argument will be executed in any case.
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_mat.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_opts.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_semijoin.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_scache.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
The test suite added.
sql/item_cmpfunc.cc:
Swap arguments creation methods added.
sql/item_cmpfunc.h:
Swap arguments creation methods added.
sql/item_subselect.cc:
Swap arguments of the comparison.
