Commit graph

118 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bernt M. Johnsen
a4002891fb Prepared for push (BUG#42567) 2009-02-26 18:17:06 +01:00
Andrei Elkin
2618337eb6 merging 5.1 -> 5.1 rpl. 3 of 4 conflicts are resolved similarly to 6.0->6.0-rpl merging.
mysql_upgrade results changed due to the error messesge of mysqlcheck has changed.
2008-11-12 19:51:47 +02:00
Davi Arnaut
1585368047 Merge from mysql-5.0-bugteam into mysql-5.1-bugteam 2008-10-24 10:50:59 -02:00
Sergey Petrunia
5249c0493e BUG#38072: Wrong result: HAVING not observed in a query with aggregate
- Make send_row_on_empty_set() return FALSE when simplify_cond() has found out
  that HAVING is always FALSE
re-committing to put the fix into 5.0 and 5.1
2008-10-24 06:16:22 +04:00
msvensson@pilot.mysql.com
a011d27cf9 Merge pilot.mysql.com:/data/msvensson/mysql/mysql-5.1-rpl
into  pilot.mysql.com:/data/msvensson/mysql/mysql-5.1-mtr
2008-04-03 11:50:43 +02:00
evgen@moonbone.local
8fe48b6875 Merge moonbone.local:/work/27219-5.0-opt-mysql
into  moonbone.local:/work/27219-bug-5.1
2008-03-28 18:09:14 +03:00
evgen@moonbone.local
21c6145a6e Bug#27219: Aggregate functions in ORDER BY.
Mixing aggregate functions and non-grouping columns is not allowed in the
ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode. However in some cases the error wasn't thrown because
of insufficient check.

In order to check more thoroughly the new algorithm employs a list of outer
fields used in a sum function and a SELECT_LEX::full_group_by_flag.
Each non-outer field checked to find out whether it's aggregated or not and
the current select is marked accordingly.
All outer fields that are used under an aggregate function are added to the
Item_sum::outer_fields list and later checked by the Item_sum::check_sum_func
function.
2008-03-27 19:49:32 +03:00
msvensson@pilot.mysql.com
9cc1698fea Add missing DROP TABLE 2008-03-14 17:59:03 +01:00
kaa@kaamos.(none)
e91bf15d5c Merge kaamos.(none):/data/src/opt/mysql-5.0-opt
into  kaamos.(none):/data/src/opt/mysql-5.1-opt
2008-01-19 21:09:22 +03:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
481a96930c Merge mhansson@bk-internal:/home/bk/mysql-5.1-opt
into  linux-st28.site:/home/martin/mysql/src/bug31797/my51-bug31797-pushee
2008-01-11 19:39:28 +01:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
afc6a369f3 Merge linux-st28.site:/home/martin/mysql/src/bug31797/my50-bug31797
into  linux-st28.site:/home/martin/mysql/src/bug31797/my51-bug31797
2008-01-11 19:13:07 +01:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
e24109c6d1 Merge mhansson@bk-internal:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-opt
into  linux-st28.site:/home/martin/mysql/src/bug31797/my50-bug31797-pushee
2008-01-11 19:00:26 +01:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
199a167246 Bug#31797: error while parsing subqueries -- WHERE is parsed as HAVING
The name resolution for correlated subqueries and HAVING clauses
failed to distinguish which of two was being performed when there 
was a reference to an outer aliased field.
Fixed by adding the condition that HAVING clause name resulotion
is being performed.
2008-01-11 18:50:54 +01:00
kaa@polly.(none)
9e829a56d4 Merge polly.(none):/home/kaa/src/opt/bug32202/my50-bug26215
into  polly.(none):/home/kaa/src/opt/bug32202/my51-bug26215
2007-11-10 22:27:34 +03:00
kaa@polly.(none)
8c19367881 Fix for bug #32202: ORDER BY not working with GROUP BY
The bug is a regression introduced by the fix for bug30596. The problem
was that in cases when groups in GROUP BY correspond to only one row,
and there is ORDER BY, the GROUP BY was removed and the ORDER BY
rewritten to ORDER BY <group_by_columns> without checking if the
columns in GROUP BY and ORDER BY are compatible. This led to
incorrect ordering of the result set as it was sorted using the
GROUP BY columns. Additionaly, the code discarded ASC/DESC modifiers
from ORDER BY even if its columns were compatible with the GROUP BY
ones.

This patch fixes the regression by checking if ORDER BY columns form a
prefix of the GROUP BY ones, and rewriting ORDER BY only in that case,
preserving the ASC/DESC modifiers. That check is sufficient, since the
GROUP BY columns contain a unique index.
2007-11-09 19:12:12 +03:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
ab73b25d5b Bug#30665: Inconsistent optimization of IGNORE INDEX FOR {ORDER BY|GROUP BY}
The optimizer takes different execution paths during EXPLAIN than SELECT,
this fix relates only to EXPLAIN, hence no behavior changes.
The test of sort keys for ORDER BY was prohibited from considering keys
that were mentioned in IGNORE KEYS FOR ORDER BY. This led to two 
inconsistencies: One was that IGNORE INDEX FOR GROUP BY and 
IGNORE INDEX FOR ORDER BY gave apparently different EXPLAINs; the latter 
erroneously claimed to do filesort. The second inconsistency 
is that the test of sort keys is called twice, finding a sort key the first
time but not the second time, leading to the mentioned filesort.

Fixed by making the test of sort keys consider all enabled 
keys on the table. This test rejects keys that are not covering, and for 
covering keys the hint should be ignored anyway.
2007-09-28 09:36:05 +02:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz
30585c3d2e Bug #30393: Test "group_by" fails with a difference in "row count"
and strategy (explain)
  
The fix for WL3527 adds tests that test if the index usage hints
combinations don't cause syntax errors.
The EXPLAIN for one of these tests can be affected by the size of the
rowid on the disk (affected by the presence of large file support). 
Fixed to avoid the platform dependent test result by removing the 
irrelevant columns from the EXPLAIN result.
2007-08-29 14:46:49 +03:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
98d34d620c Bug #30596 GROUP BY optimization gives wrong result order
The optimization that uses a unique index to remove GROUP BY did not 
ensure that the index was actually used, thus violating the ORDER BY
that is implied by GROUP BY.
Fixed by replacing GROUP BY with ORDER BY if the GROUP BY clause contains
a unique index over non-nullable field(s). In case GROUP BY ... ORDER BY 
null is used, GROUP BY is simply removed.
2007-08-28 18:01:29 +02:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
a4d5d9204d Bug #30596 GROUP BY optimization gives wrong result order
The optimization that uses a unique index to remove GROUP BY, did not 
ensure that the index was actually used, thus violating the ORDER BY
that is impled by GROUP BY.
Fixed by replacing GROUP BY with ORDER BY if the GROUP BY clause contains
a unique index. In case GROUP BY ... ORDER BY null is used, GROUP BY is
simply removed.
2007-08-27 17:33:41 +02:00
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none)
d72a6b1227 Merge mysql.com:/home/hf/work/29717/my50-29717
into  mysql.com:/home/hf/work/29717/my51-29717
2007-07-31 11:12:23 +05:00
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none)
0ff0ed2732 Merge mysql.com:/home/hf/work/29717/my41-29717
into  mysql.com:/home/hf/work/29717/my50-29717
2007-07-31 11:03:31 +05:00
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none)
f1ee2d0687 Bug #29717 INSERT INTO SELECT inserts values even if
SELECT statement itself returns empty.

As a result of this bug 'SELECT AGGREGATE_FUNCTION(fld) ... GROUP BY'
can return one row instead of an empty result set.

When GROUP BY only has fields of constant tables
(with a single row), the optimizer deletes the group_list.
After that we lose the information about whether we had an
GROUP BY statement. Though it's important
as SELECT min(x) from empty_table; and
   SELECT min(x) from empty_table GROUP BY y; have to return
different results - the first query should return one row,
second - an empty result set.
So here we add the 'group_optimized_away' flag to remember this case
when GROUP BY exists in the query and is removed
by the optimizer, and check this flag in end_send_group()
2007-07-31 10:46:04 +05:00
mhansson/martin@linux-st28.site
660d647526 Bug#27634: group_by test fails
On many architectures, e.g. 68000, x86, the double registers have higher precision 
than the IEEE standard prescribes. When compiled with flags -O and higher, some double's 
go into registers and therefore have higher precision. In one test case the cost 
information of the best and second-best key were close enough to be influenced by this 
effect, causing a failed test in distribution builds.

Fixed by removing some rows from the table in question so that cost information is not
influenced by decimals beyond standard definition of double.
2007-06-12 15:10:33 +03:00
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none)
2fcebef31f Merge mysql.com:/d2/hf/mrg/mysql-5.0-opt
into  mysql.com:/d2/hf/mrg/mysql-5.1-opt
2007-04-29 13:19:32 +05:00
evgen@moonbone.local
5cd1f992ce Bug#27874: Non-grouped columns are allowed by * in ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode.
When fields are inserted instead of * in the select list they were not marked
for check for the ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode.

The Field_iterator_table::create_item() function now marks newly created
items for check when in the ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode.
The setup_wild() and the insert_fields() functions now maintain the
cur_pos_in_select_list counter for the ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode.
2007-04-24 22:35:57 +04:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz
101857299a WL3527: 5.1
renamed "--old-mode" to "--old" to prevent
 ambiguity.
 "old" now appears in SHOW VARIABLES as a
 read-only option.
2007-03-26 19:15:30 +03:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz
c03a483c51 Merge gkodinov@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.1-opt
into  magare.gmz:/home/kgeorge/mysql/autopush/WL3527-5.1-opt
2007-03-09 17:54:13 +02:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.gmz
b9c82eaa89 WL#3527: Extend IGNORE INDEX so places where index is ignored
can be specified
Currently MySQL allows one to specify what indexes to ignore during
join optimization. The scope of the current USE/FORCE/IGNORE INDEX 
statement is only the FROM clause, while all other clauses are not 
affected.

However, in certain cases, the optimizer
may incorrectly choose an index for sorting and/or grouping, and
produce an inefficient query plan.

This task provides the means to specify what indexes are
ignored/used for what operation in a more fine-grained manner, thus
making it possible to manually force a better plan. We do this
by extending the current IGNORE/USE/FORCE INDEX syntax to:

IGNORE/USE/FORCE INDEX [FOR {JOIN | ORDER | GROUP BY}]

so that:
- if no FOR is specified, the index hint will apply everywhere.
- if MySQL is started with the compatibility option --old_mode then
  an index hint without a FOR clause works as in 5.0 (i.e, the 
  index will only be ignored for JOINs, but can still be used to
  compute ORDER BY).

See the WL#3527 for further details.
2007-03-05 19:08:41 +02:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.gmz
17a0207ece Merge macbook.gmz:/Users/kgeorge/mysql/work/mysql-5.0-opt
into  macbook.gmz:/Users/kgeorge/mysql/work/merge-5.1-opt
2007-01-23 12:34:50 +02:00
evgen@moonbone.local
19ee0a94fe Bug#23417: Too strict checks against GROUP BY in the ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode.
Currently in the ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode no hidden fields are allowed in the
select list. To ensure this each expression in the select list is checked
to be a constant, an aggregate function or to occur in the GROUP BY list.
The last two requirements are wrong and doesn't allow valid expressions like
"MAX(b) - MIN(b)" or "a + 1" in a query with grouping by a.

The correct check implemented by the patch will ensure that:
any field reference in the [sub]expressions of the select list 
  is under an aggregate function or
  is mentioned as member of the group list or
  is an outer reference or
  is part of the select list element that coincide with a grouping element.

The Item_field objects now can contain the position of the select list
expression which they belong to. The position is saved during the
field's Item_field::fix_fields() call.

The non_agg_fields list for non-aggregated fields is added to the SELECT_LEX
class. The SELECT_LEX::cur_pos_in_select_list now contains the position in the
select list of the expression being currently fixed.
2007-01-11 23:18:01 +03:00
gkodinov@dl145s.mysql.com
aaed398254 Merge dl145s.mysql.com:/data/bk/team_tree_merge/MERGE/mysql-5.0-opt
into  dl145s.mysql.com:/data/bk/team_tree_merge/MERGE/mysql-5.1-opt
2006-10-19 16:43:46 +02:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.gmz
dff0a1ac7c Merge macbook.gmz:/Users/kgeorge/mysql/work/B14019-4.1-opt
into  macbook.gmz:/Users/kgeorge/mysql/work/B14019-5.0-opt
2006-10-16 13:24:54 +03:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.gmz
115616381d BUG#14019 : group by converts literal string to column name
When resolving unqualified name references MySQL was not
   checking what is the item type for the reference. Thus
   e.g a string literal item that has by convention a name
   equal to its string value will also work as a reference to 
   a SELECT list item or a table field.
   Fixed by allowing only Item_ref or Item_field to referenced by
   (unqualified) name.
2006-10-16 13:10:25 +03:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.local
13633864bb Bug #22781: SQL_BIG_RESULT fails to influence sort plan
Currently SQL_BIG_RESULT is checked only at compile time.
 However, additional optimizations may take place after
 this check that change the sort method from 'filesort'
 to sorting via index. As a result the actual plan
 executed is not the one specified by the SQL_BIG_RESULT
 hint. Similarly, there is no such test when executing
 EXPLAIN, resulting in incorrect output.
 The patch corrects the problem by testing for
 SQL_BIG_RESULT both during the explain and execution
 phases.
2006-10-09 19:51:41 +04:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.gmz
903387afc0 Bug #21174: Index degrades sort performance and optimizer does not honor IGNORE INDEX
- reversed the patch for 5.0 and moved to 5.1
2006-09-27 12:53:53 +03:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.gmz
25eaa521bf Bug #21174: Index degrades sort performance and
optimizer does not honor IGNORE INDEX
 - Allow an index to be used for sorting the table 
   instead of filesort only if it is not disabled by
   IGNORE INDEX.
2006-08-14 18:19:29 +03:00
gkodinov/kgeorge@macbook.mshome.net
0282028292 Bug #20466: a view is mixing data when there's a trigger on the table
When making a place to store field values at the start of each group
  the real item (not the reference) must be used when deciding which column
  to copy.
2006-07-21 20:44:35 +03:00
msvensson@neptunus.(none)
e5eb7cbf29 WL#2930 Adding view and cursor 'protocols' to mysqltest
- Cleanup of mysqltest.c before extending it
2005-10-31 12:25:08 +01:00
serg@serg.mylan
3d7844ca89 merged 2005-09-09 12:43:25 +02:00
serg@serg.mylan
f16bb5da7e aftermerge 2005-09-09 12:15:25 +02:00
sergefp@mysql.com
98fee7f289 Merge spetrunia@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0
into mysql.com:/home/psergey/mysql-5.0-merge
2005-09-09 12:57:41 +04:00
sergefp@mysql.com
cd813a0911 Post-merge fixes 2005-09-09 12:57:00 +04:00
serg@serg.mylan
b69f49c0d5 Merge bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0
into serg.mylan:/usr/home/serg/Abk/mysql-5.0
2005-09-09 10:49:09 +02:00
serg@serg.mylan
c7eaac52b3 merged 2005-09-09 09:44:58 +02:00
sergefp@mysql.com
3d6759d190 Merge 4.1->5.0 2005-09-09 10:54:59 +04:00
serg@serg.mylan
a7f2179c29 BUG#12695: Item_func_isnull::update_used_tables did not update const_item_cache 2005-09-08 22:57:27 +02:00
sergefp@mysql.com
e554e61734 Post-merge fixes 2005-08-07 22:10:05 +00:00
sergefp@mysql.com
0dba629a5e Manual merge 2005-08-07 21:30:46 +00:00
evgen@moonbone.local
697836c77f Fix bug#12266 GROUP BY DATE(LEFT(column,8)) returns result strings with reduced
length.

When temporary field created for DATE(LEFT(column,8)) expression, max_length
value is taken from Item_date_typecast, and it is getting it from underlaid
Item_func_left and it's max_length is 8 in given expression. And all this
results in stripping last 2 digits.

To Item_date_typecast class added its own fix_length_and_dec() function 
that sets max_length value to 10, which is proper for DATE field.
2005-08-04 18:05:33 +04:00
monty@mysql.com
15d48525af Merge mysql.com:/home/my/mysql-4.1
into  mysql.com:/home/my/mysql-5.0
2005-07-28 17:09:54 +03:00