------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2476.784.3
committer: davi@moksha.local
timestamp: Tue 2007-10-02 21:27:31 -0300
message:
Bug#25858 Some DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES can cause deadlocks
When a client (connection) holds a lock on a table and attempts to
drop (obtain a exclusive lock) on a second table that is already
held by a second client and the second client then attempts to
drop the table that is held by the first client, leads to a
circular wait deadlock. This scenario is very similar to trying to
drop (or rename) a table while holding read locks and are
correctly forbidden.
The solution is to allow a drop table operation to continue only
if the table being dropped is write (exclusively) locked, or if
the table is temporary, or if the client is not holding any
locks. Using this scheme prevents the creation of a circular
chain in which each client is waiting for one table that the
next client in the chain is holding.
This is incompatible change, as can be seen by number of tests
cases that needed to be fixed, but is consistent with respect to
behavior of the different scenarios in which the circular wait
might happen.
Backport for 5.5
The root cause of this bug is that the grammar for GROUP BY clauses,
when using WITH CUBE or WITH ROLLUP, cause conflicts with the grammar
for VIEW, when using WITH CHECK OPTION.
The solution is to implement two token look ahead when parsing a WITH token,
to disambiguate the non standard WITH CUBE and WITH ROLLUP syntaxes.
Patch based on code from Marc Alff and Antony Curtis
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> revno: 2792
> revision-id: sergey.glukhov@sun.com-20090703083500-jq8vhw0tqr37j7te
> parent: bernt.johnsen@sun.com-20090703083610-o7l4s8syz05rc4w0
> committer: Sergey Glukhov <Sergey.Glukhov@sun.com>
> branch nick: mysql-5.0-bugteam
> timestamp: Fri 2009-07-03 13:35:00 +0500
> message:
> Bug#45806 crash when replacing into a view with a join!
> The crash happend because for views which are joins
> we have table_list->table == 0 and
> table_list->table->'any method' call leads to crash.
> The fix is to perform table_list->table->file->extra()
> method for all tables belonging to view.
The crash happend because for views which are joins
we have table_list->table == 0 and
table_list->table->'any method' call leads to crash.
The fix is to perform table_list->table->file->extra()
method for all tables belonging to view.
with a "HAVING" clause though query works
SELECT from views defined like:
CREATE VIEW v1 (view_column)
AS SELECT c AS alias FROM t1 HAVING alias
fails with an error 1356:
View '...' references invalid table(s) or column(s)
or function(s) or definer/invoker of view lack rights
to use them
CREATE VIEW form with a (column list) substitutes
SELECT column names/aliases with names from a
view column list.
However, alias references in HAVING clause was
not substituted.
The Item_ref::print function has been modified
to write correct aliased names of underlying
items into VIEW definition generation/.frm file.
Problem: executing queries like "ALTER TABLE view1;" we don't
check new view's name (which is not specified),
that leads to server crash.
Fix: do nothing (to be consistent with the behaviour for tables)
in such cases.
+ Fix for Bug#43114 wait_until_count_sessions too restrictive, random PB failures
+ Removal of a lot of other weaknesses found
+ modifications according to review
an error
Even after the fix for bug 28701 visible behaviors of
SELECT FROM a view and SELECT FROM a regular table are
little bit different:
1. "SELECT FROM regular table USE/FORCE/IGNORE(non
existent index)" fails with a "ERROR 1176 (HY000):
Key '...' doesn't exist in table '...'"
2. "SELECT FROM view USING/FORCE/IGNORE(any index)" fails
with a "ERROR 1221 (HY000): Incorrect usage of
USE/IGNORE INDEX and VIEW". OTOH "SHOW INDEX FROM
view" always returns empty result set, so from the point
of same behaviour view we trying to use/ignore non
existent index.
To harmonize the behaviour of USE/FORCE/IGNORE(index)
clauses in SELECT from a view and from a regular table the
"ERROR 1221 (HY000): Incorrect usage of USE/IGNORE INDEX
and VIEW" message has been replaced with the "ERROR 1176
(HY000): Key '...' doesn't exist in table '...'" message
like for tables and non existent keys.
A string buffers which were included in the 'view' data structure
were allocated on the stack, causing an invalid pointer when used
after the function returned.
The fix: use copy of values for view->md5 & view->queries
View definition as SELECT ... FROM DUAL WHERE ... has
valid syntax, but use of such view in SELECT or
SHOW CREATE VIEW syntax causes unexpected syntax error.
Server omits FROM DUAL clause when storing view body
string in a .frm file for further evaluation.
However, syntax of SELECT-witout-FROM query is more
restrictive than SELECT FROM DUAL syntax, and doesn't
allow the WHERE clause.
NOTE: this syntax difference is not documented.
View registration procedure has been modified to
preserve original structure of view's body.
suite)
Under some circumstances a combination of aggregate functions and
GROUP BY in a SELECT query over a VIEW could lead to incorrect
calculation of the result type of the aggregate function. This in
turn could result in incorrect results, or assertion failures on debug
builds.
Fixed by changing the logic in Item_sum_hybrid::fix_fields() so that
the argument's item is dereferenced before calling its type() method.
a table name.
The problem was that fill_defined_view_parts() did not return
an error if a table is going to be altered. That happened if
the table was already in the table cache. In that case,
open_table() returned non-NULL value (valid TABLE-instance from
the cache).
The fix is to ensure that an error is thrown even if the table
is in the cache.
(This is a backport of the original patch for 5.1)
The problem is that when a stored procedure is being parsed for
the first execution, the body is copied to a temporary buffer
which is disregarded sometime after the statement is parsed.
And during this parsing phase, the rule for CREATE VIEW was
holding a reference to the string being parsed for use during
the execution of the CREATE VIEW statement, leading to invalid
memory access later.
The solution is to allocate and copy the SELECT of a CREATE
VIEW statement using the thread memory root, which is set to
the permanent arena of the stored procedure.
a table name.
The problem was that fill_defined_view_parts() did not return
an error if a table is going to be altered. That happened if
the table was already in the table cache. In that case,
open_table() returned non-NULL value (valid TABLE-instance from
the cache).
The fix is to ensure that an error is thrown even if the table
is in the cache.
but not collation.
The problem here was that text literals in a view were always
dumped with character set introducer. That lead to loosing
collation information.
The fix is to dump character set introducer only if it was
in the original query. That is now possible because there
is no problem any more of loss of character set of string
literals in views -- after WL#4052 the view is dumped
in the original character set.
or trigger crashes server
Under some circumstances a combination of VIEWs, subselects with outer
references and PS/SP/triggers could lead to use of uninitialized memory
and server crash as a result.
Fixed by changing the code in Item_field::fix_fields() so that in cases
when the field is a VIEW reference, we first check whether the field
is also an outer reference, and mark it appropriately before returning.
value when inserting into a view.
The mysql_prepare_insert function checks all fields of the target table that
directly or indirectly (through a view) are specified in the INSERT
statement to have a default value. This check can be skipped if the INSERT
statement doesn't mention any insert fields. In case of a view this allows
fields that aren't mentioned in the view to bypass the check.
Now fields of the target table are always checked to have a default value
when insert goes into a view.
The following clarification should be made in The Manual:
Standard SQL is quite clear that, if new columns are added
to a table after a view on that table is created with
"select *", the new columns will not become part of the view.
In all cases, the view definition (view structure) is frozen
at CREATE time, so changes to the underlying tables do not
affect the view structure.
When storing the VIEW the CREATE VIEW command is reconstructed
from the parse tree. While constructing the command string
the index hints specified should also be printed.
Fixed by adding code to print the index hints when printing a
table in the FROM clause.
information schema table.
The get_schema_views_record() function fills records in the view table of
the informations schema with data about given views. Among other info
the is_updatable flag is set. But the check whether the view is updatable or
not wasn't covering all cases thus sometimes providing wrong info.
This might led to a user confusion.
Now the get_schema_views_record function additionally calls to the
view->can_be_merge() function to find out whether the view can be updated or
not.
