The additional patch. That 'loadxml.test' failure was actually about our testing system,
not the code.
Firstly we need a new mysqltest command, wich i called 'send_eval'. So the expression
can be evaluated, then started in a parallel thread. We only have separane 'send' and
'eval' commands at the moment.
Then we need to add the waiting code after the 'KILL' to our test, so the thread will be killed
before the test goes further. The present 'reap' command doesn't handle the killed threads
well.
per-file comments:
client/mysqltest.cc
Bug#42520 killing load .. infile Assertion failed: ! is_set(), file .\sql_error.cc, line 8
The 'send_eval' command implemented.
mysql-test/r/loadxml.result
Bug#42520 killing load .. infile Assertion failed: ! is_set(), file .\sql_error.cc, line 8
test result updated.
mysql-test/t/loadxml.test
Bug#42520 killing load .. infile Assertion failed: ! is_set(), file .\sql_error.cc, line 8
test case added.
Bug#41756 "Strange error messages about locks from InnoDB".
In JT_EQ_REF (join_read_key()) access method,
don't try to unlock rows in the handler, unless certain that
a) they were locked
b) they are not used.
Unlocking of rows is done by the logic of the nested join loop,
and is unaware of the possible caching that the access method may
have. This could lead to double unlocking, when a row
was unlocked first after reading into the cache, and then
when taken from cache, as well as to unlocking of rows which
were actually used (but taken from cache).
Delegate part of the unlocking logic to the access method,
and in JT_EQ_REF count how many times a record was actually
used in the join. Unlock it only if it's usage count is 0.
Implemented review comments.
Bug#41756 "Strange error messages about locks from InnoDB".
In JT_EQ_REF (join_read_key()) access method,
don't try to unlock rows in the handler, unless certain that
a) they were locked
b) they are not used.
Unlocking of rows is done by the logic of the nested join loop,
and is unaware of the possible caching that the access method may
have. This could lead to double unlocking, when a row
was unlocked first after reading into the cache, and then
when taken from cache, as well as to unlocking of rows which
were actually used (but taken from cache).
Delegate part of the unlocking logic to the access method,
and in JT_EQ_REF count how many times a record was actually
used in the join. Unlock it only if it's usage count is 0.
Implemented review comments.
values return too many records
WHERE clauses with "outer_value_list NOT IN subselect" were
handled incorrectly if the outer value list contained multiple
items where at least one of these could be NULL. The first
outer record with NULL value was handled correctly, but if a
second record with NULL value existed, the optimizer would
choose to reuse the result it got on the last execution of the
subselect. This is incorrect if the outer value list has
multiple items.
The fix is to make Item_in_optimizer::val_int (in
item_cmpfunc.cc) reuse the result of the latest execution
for NULL values only if all values in the outer_value_list
are NULL.
When a sessione is closed, all temporary tables of the session are automatically
dropped and are binlogged. But it will be binlogged with wrong database names when
the length of the temporary tables' database names are greater than the
length of the current database name or the current database is not set.
Query_log_event's db_len is forgot to set when Query_log_event's db is set.
This patch wrote code to set db_len immediately after db has set.
When a query was using a DATE or DATETIME value formatted
using any other separator characters beside hyphen '-', a
query with a greater-or-equal '>=' condition matching only
the greatest value in an indexed column, the result was
empty if index range scan was employed.
The range optimizer got a new feature between 5.1.38 and
5.1.39 that changes a greater-or-equal condition to a
greater-than if the value matching that in the query was not
present in the table. But the value comparison function
compared the dates as strings instead of dates.
The bug was fixed by splitting the function
get_date_from_str in two: One part that parses and does
error checking. This function is now visible outside the
module. The old get_date_from_str now calls the new
function.
Detailed revision comments:
r6127 | vasil | 2009-10-30 11:18:25 +0200 (Fri, 30 Oct 2009) | 18 lines
branches/5.1:
Backport c6121 from branches/zip:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r6121 | sunny | 2009-10-30 01:42:11 +0200 (Fri, 30 Oct 2009) | 7 lines
Changed paths:
M /branches/zip/mysql-test/innodb-autoinc.result
branches/zip: This test has been problematic for sometime now. The underlying
bug is that the data dictionaries get out of sync. In the AUTOINC code we
try and apply salve to the symptoms. In the past MySQL made some unrelated
change and the dictionaries stopped getting out of sync and this test started
to fail. Now, it seems they have reverted that changed and the test is
passing again. I suspect this is not he last time that this test will change.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detailed revision comments:
r6052 | sunny | 2009-10-12 07:09:56 +0300 (Mon, 12 Oct 2009) | 4 lines
branches/5.1: Reset the statement level autoinc counter on ROLLBACK. Fix
the test results too.
rb://164
r6053 | sunny | 2009-10-12 07:37:49 +0300 (Mon, 12 Oct 2009) | 6 lines
branches/5.1: Copy the maximum AUTOINC value from the old table to the new
table when MySQL does a CREATE INDEX ON T. This is required because MySQL
does a table copy, rename and drops the old table.
Fix Bug#47125: auto_increment start value is ignored if an index is created and engine=innodb
rb://168
Detailed revision comments:
r6051 | sunny | 2009-10-12 07:05:00 +0300 (Mon, 12 Oct 2009) | 6 lines
branches/5.1: Ignore negative values supplied by the user when calculating the
next value to store in dict_table_t. Setting autoincrement columns top negative
values is undefined behavior and this change should bring the behavior of
InnoDB closer to what users expect. Added several tests to check.
rb://162
Detailed revision comments:
r6045 | jyang | 2009-10-08 02:27:08 +0300 (Thu, 08 Oct 2009) | 7 lines
branches/5.1: Fix bug #47777. Treat the Geometry data same as
Binary BLOB in ha_innobase::store_key_val_for_row(), since the
Geometry data is stored as Binary BLOB in Innodb.
Review: rb://180 approved by Marko Makela.
