sql/sql_insert.cc:
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
******
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
sql/sql_table.cc:
small cleanup
******
small cleanup
Analysis:
Both the wrong result and the valgrind warning were a result
of incomplete cleanup of the MIN/MAX subquery rewrite. At the
first execution of the query, the non-aggregate subquery is
transformed into an aggregate MIN/MAX subquery. During the
fix_fields phase of the MIN/MAX function, it sets the property
st_select_lex::with_sum_func to true.
The second execution of the query finds this flag to be ON.
When optimization reaches the same MIN/MAX subquery
transformation, it tests if the subquery is an aggregate or not.
Since select_lex->with_sum_func == true from the previous
execution, the transformation executes the second branch that
handles aggregate subqueries. This substitutes the subquery
Item into a Item_maxmin_subselect. At the same time elsewhere
it is assumed that the subquery Item is of type
Item_allany_subselect. Ultimately this results in casting the
actual object to the wrong class, and calling the wrong
any_value() method from empty_underlying_subquery().
Solution:
Cleanup the st_select_lex::with_sum_func property in the case
when the MIN/MAX transformation was performed for a non-aggregate
subquery, so that the transformation can be repeated.
Analysis:
For some of the re-executions of the correlated subquery the
where clause is false. In these cases the execution of the
subquery detects that it must generate a NULL row because of
implicit grouping. In this case the subquery execution reaches
the following code in do_select():
while ((table= li++))
mark_as_null_row(table->table);
This code marks all rows in the table as complete NULL rows.
In the example, when evaluating the field t2.f10 for the second
row, all bits of Field::null_ptr[0] are set by the previous call
to mark_as_null_row(). Then the call to Field::is_null()
returns true, resulting in a NULL for the MAX function.
Thus the lines above are not suitable for subquery re-execution
because mark_as_null_row() changes the NULL bits of each table
field, and there is no logic to restore these fields.
Solution:
The call to mark_as_null_row() was added by the fix for bug
lp:613029. Therefore removing the fix for lp:613029 corrects
this wrong result. At the same time the test for lp:613029
behaves correctly because the changes of MWL#89 result in a
different execution path where:
- the constant subquery is evaluated via JOIN::exec_const_cond
- detecting that it has an empty result triggers the branch
if (zero_result_cause)
return_zero_rows()
- return_zero_rows() calls mark_as_null_row().
- Set the default
- Adjust the testcases so that 'new' tests are run with optimizations turned on.
- Pull out relevant tests from "irrelevant" tests and run them with optimizations on.
- Run range.test and innodb.test with both mrr=on and mrr=off
Analysis:
This bug is yet another incarnation of the generic problem
where optimization of the outer query triggers evaluation
of a subquery, and this evaluation performs a destructive
change to the subquery plan. Specifically a temp table is
created for the DISTINCT operation that replaces the
original subquery table. Later, select_describe() attempts
to print the table name, however, there is no corresponding
TABLE_LIST object to the internal temp table, so we get a
crash. Execution works fine because it is not interested in
the corresponding TABLE_LIST object (or its name).
Solution:
Similar to other such bugs, block the evaluation of expensive
Items in convert_const_to_int().
semijoin=on,firstmatch=on,loosescan=on
to
semijoin=off,firstmatch=off,loosescan=off
Adjust the testcases:
- Modify subselect*.test and join_cache.test so that all tests
use the same execution paths as before (i.e. optimizations that
are being tested are enabled)
- Let all other test files run with the new default settings (i.e.
with new optimizations disabled)
- Copy subquery testcases from these files into t/subselect_extra.test
which will run them with new optimizations enabled.
Analysis:
This bug consists of two related problems that are
result of too early evaluation of single-row subqueries
during the optimization phase of the outer query.
Several optimizer code paths try to evaluate single-row
subqueries in order to produce a constant and use that
constant for further optimzation.
When the execution of the subquery peforms destructive
changes to the representation of the subquery, and these
changes are not anticipated by the subsequent optimization
phases of the outer query, we tipically get a crash or
failed assert.
Specifically, in this bug the inner-most suqbuery with
DISTINCT triggers a substitution of the original JOIN
object by a single-table JOIN object with a temp table
needed to perform the DISTINCT operation (created by
JOIN::make_simple_join).
This substitution breaks EXPLAIN because:
a) in the first example JOIN::cleanup no longer can
reach the original table of the innermost subquery, and
close all indexes, and
b) in this second test query, EXPLAIN attempts to print
the name of the internal temp table, and crashes because
the temp table has no name (NULL pointer instead).
Solution:
a) fully disable subquery evaluation during optimization
in all cases - both for constant propagation and range
optimization, and
b) change JOIN::join_free() to perform cleanup irrespective
of EXPLAIN or not.
- Update test results
- Fix a problem with PS:
= convert_subq_to_sj() should not save where to prep_where or on_expr to prep_on_expr.
= After an unmerged subquery predicate has been pulled, it should call fix_after_pullout() for
outer_refs.
mysql-test/r/subselect4.result:
Moved test case for LP BUG#718593 into the correct test file subselect_mat_cost_bugs.test.
mysql-test/t/subselect4.test:
Moved test case for LP BUG#718593 into the correct test file subselect_mat_cost_bugs.test.
Resolved all conflicts, bad merges and fixed a few minor bugs in the code.
Commented out the queries from multi_update, view, subselect_sj, func_str,
derived_view, view_grant that failed either with crashes in ps-protocol or
with wrong results.
The failures are clear indications of some bugs in the code and these bugs
are to be fixed.
Analysis:
The subquery is evaluated first during ref-optimization of the outer
query because the subquery is considered constant from the perspective
of the outer query. Thus an attempt is made to evaluate the MAX subquery
and use the new constant to drive an index nested loops join.
During this evaluation the inner-most subquery replaces the JOIN_TAB
with a new one that fetches the data from a temp table.
The function select_describe crashes at the lines:
TABLE_LIST *real_table= table->pos_in_table_list;
item_list.push_back(new Item_string(real_table->alias,
strlen(real_table->alias),
cs));
because 'table' is a temp table, and it has no corresponding table
reference. This 'real_table' is NULL, and real_table->alias results
in a crash.
Solution:
In the spirit of MWL#89 prevent the evaluation of expensive predicates
during optimization. This patch prevents the evaluation of expensive
predicates during ref optimization.
sql/item_subselect.h:
Remove unused class member. Not needed for the fix, but noticed now and removed.
Analysis:
During optimization of the subquery, in the call chain:
update_ref_and_keys -> add_key_fields ->
merge_key_fields -> Item_direct_ref::is_null -> Item_cache::is_null
The call to Item_cache::is_null() returns TRUE, which is wrong.
This results in Item_null replacing the field 'f3' in the KEY_FIELD,
then this Item_null is used for index access, producing a wrong result.
The reason why Item_cache::is_null returns wrong result is that
this Item_cache object is a cache of the left operand of IN, and was
updated in Item_in_optimizer::val_int. In MWL#89 the latter method is
called during the execution phase, which is after we optimize the subquery.
Therefore during the optization phase the left operand cache of IN was
not updated.
Solution:
Update the left operand cache during optimization if it is a constant.
This bug fix also discoveres and fixes a wrong IF statement in
convert_constant_item().
Analysis:
The method st_select_lex::optimize_unflattened_subqueries()
incorrectly propagated to each subquery the complete
select_options flag set for the whole query. Among other
flags in select_options, this propagated incorrectly the
STRAIGHT_JOIN flag from the upper query to the subquery.
Solution:
During EXPLAIN set only the SELECT_DESCRIBE bit in the
select_options of the subquery.
Analysis:
Build_equal_items_for_cond() rewrites the WHERE clause in such a way,
that it may merge the list join->cond_equal->current_level with the
list of child Items in an AND condition of the WHERE clause.
The place where this is done is:
static COND *build_equal_items_for_cond(THD *thd, COND *cond,
COND_EQUAL *inherited)
{
...
if (and_level)
{
args->concat(&eq_list);
args->concat((List<Item> *)&cond_equal.current_level);
}
...
}
As a result, later transformations on the WHERE clause may change the
structure of the list join->cond_equal->current_level without knowing this.
Specifically in this bug, Item_in_subselect::inject_in_to_exists_cond
creates a new AND of the old WHERE clause and the IN->EXISTS conditions.
It then calls fix_fields() for the new AND. Among other things, fix_fields
flattens all nested ANDs into one by merging the AND argument lists.
When there is a cond_equal for the JOIN, its list of Item_equal objects
is attached to the end of the original AND. When a lower-level AND is
merged into the top-level one, the argument list of the lower-level AND
is concatenated to the list of multiple equalities in the upper-level AND.
As a result, when substitute_for_best_equal_field processes the
multiple equalities, it turns out that the multiple equality list contains
the Items from the lower-level AND which were concatenated to the end of
the join->cond_equal->current_level list. This results in a crash because
this list must not contain any other Items except for the previously found
Item_equal ones.
Solution:
When performing IN->EXIST predicate injection, and the where clause is an
AND, detach the list of Item_equal objects before calling fix_fields on
the injected where clause.
After fix_fields is done, reattach back the multiple equalities list to
the end of the argument list of the new AND.
Analysis:
The wrong result is a consquence of sorting the subquery
result and then selecting only the first row due to the
artificial LIMIT 1 introduced by the fix_fields phase.
Normally, if there is an ORDER BY in a subquery, the ORDER
is removed (Item_in_subselect::select_in_like_transformer),
however if a GROUP BY is transformed into ORDER, this happens
later, after the removal of the ORDER clause of subqueries, so
we end up with a subquery with an ORDER clause, and an artificially
added LIMIT 1.
The reason why the same works in the main 5.3 without MWL#89, is
that the 5.3 performs all subquery transformations, including
IN->EXISTS before JOIN::optimize(). The beginning of JOIN::optimize
does:
if (having || (select_options & OPTION_FOUND_ROWS))
select_limit= HA_POS_ERROR;
which sets the limit back to infinity, thus 5.3 sorts the whole
subquery result, and IN performs the lookup into all subquery result
rows.
Solution:
Sorting of subqueries without LIMIT is meaningless. Since LIMIT in
subqueries is not supported, the patch removes sorting by setting
join->skip_sort_order= true
for each subquery JOIN object. This improves a number of execution
plans to not perform unnecessary sorting at all.
- "Using MRR" is no longer shown with range access.
- Instead, both range and BKA accesses will show one of the following:
= "Rowid-ordered scan"
= "Key-ordered scan"
= "Key-ordered Rowid-ordered scan"
depending on whether DS-MRR implementation will do scan keys in order, rowids in order,
or both.
- The patch also introduces a way for other storage engines/MRR implementations to
pass information to EXPLAIN output about the properties of employed MRR scans.
Analysis:
There are two code paths through which JOIN::exec may produce
an all-NULL row for an empty result set. One goes via the
function return_zero_rows(), when query processing detectes
early that the where clause is false, the other one is via
do_select() in the case of join execution.
In the case of do_select(), the problem was that the executioner
didn't set TABLE::null_row to 1. As result when sending the only
result row, the evaluation of each field didn't detect that all
non-aggregated fields are NULL, because Field::is_null returned
true, after checking that field->table->null_row was false.
Given that the each non-aggregated field was not considered NULL,
select_result::send_data sent whatever was in the buffer of each
field. However, since there was no actual data in the field buffer,
send_data() accessed and sent whatever junk was in the field's
data buffer.
Solution:
Similar to the analogous case in return_zero_rows() mark all
tables that their current row is NULL before sending the
artificailly created NULL row.
Analysis:
A query with implicit grouping is one with aggregate functions and
no GROUP BY clause. MariaDB inherits from MySQL an SQL extenstion
that allows mixing aggregate functions with non-aggregate fields.
If a query with such mixed select clause produces an empty result
set, the meaning of aggregate functions is well defined - either
NULL (MIN, MAX, etc.), or 0 (count(*)). However the non-aggregated
fields must also have some value, and the only reasonable value in
the case of empty result is NULL.
The cause of the many wrong results was that if a field is declared
as non-nullable (e.g. because it is a PK or NOT NULL), the semantic
analysis and the optimization phases treat this field as non-nullable,
and generate all related query plan elements based on this assumption.
Later during execution, these incorrectly configured/generated query
plan elements result in a wrong result because the selected fields
are not null due to the not-null assumption during optimization.
Solution:
Detect before the context analysys phase that a query uses implicit
grouping with mixed aggregates/non-aggregates, and set all fields
as nullable. The parser already walks the SELECT clause, and
already sets Item::with_sum_func for Items that reference aggreagate
functions. The patch adds a symmetric Item::with_field so that all
Items that reference an Item_field are marked during their
construction at parse time in the same way as with aggregate function
use.
Analysis:
The reason for the crash was that the inner subquery was executed
via a scan on a final temporary table applied after all other
operations. This final operation is implemented by changing the
contents of the JOIN object of the subquery to represent a table
scan over the temp table. At the same time query optimization of
the outer subquery required evaluation of the inner subquery, which
happened before the actual EXPLAIN. The evaluation left the JOIN
object of the inner subquery in the changed state, where it represented
a table scan over a temp table, and EXPLAIN crashed because the temp
table is not associated with any table reference (TABLE_LIST object).
The reason the JOIN was not restored was because its saving/restoration
was controlled by the join->select_lex->uncacheable flag, which was
not set in the case of materialization.
Solution:
In the methods Item_in_subselect::[single | row]_value_transformer() set:
select_lex->uncacheable|= UNCACHEABLE_EXPLAIN;
In addition, for symmetry, change:
master_unit->uncacheable|= UNCACHEABLE_EXPLAIN;
instead of UNCACHEABLE_DEPENDENT because if a subquery was not
dependent initially, the changed methods do not change this
fact. The subquery may later become correlated if it is transformed
to an EXISTS query, but it may stay uncorrelated if executed via
materialization.
