Remove size of binlog file from SHOW BINARY LOGS.
Changing size of binlog file is an affect of adding or removing events to/from
binlog and it can be checked in next command of test: SHOW BINLOG EVENTS.
For SHOW BINARY LOGS statement enough to show the list of file names.
It seems that the length of the thick line printed by mtr when printing the
suite name differs from mtr1 and mtr2, affecting the mtr filtering by PB2.
This patch addresses it by restoring the thick line length to 78 (original
length) instead of 60 (the one in mtr2).
The test case proposed by the bugfix fails in bugteam trees after merging new
mtr from main. The failure is due to the fact that the binlog file location has
changed and is no more under $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/log.
This patch fixes the test failure by setting the correct path to the binlog
file.
When storing a NULL to a TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT ...,
NULL returned from some functions threw a 'cannot be NULL error.'
NULL-returns now correctly result in the timestamp-field being
assigned its default value.
conflicts:
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/r/rpl_max_binlog_size_func.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/t/rpl_max_binlog_size_func.test
After the earlier fix, mtr tests reports "table full" messages as warnings. This is
expected, this patch fixes the mtr testframework to ignore the error message.
Item_in_optimizer::is_null() evaluated "NULL IN (SELECT ...)" to NULL regardless of
whether subquery produced any records, this was a documented limitation.
The limitation has been removed (see bugs 8804, 24085, 24127) now
Item_in_optimizer::val_int() correctly handles all cases with NULLs. Make
Item_in_optimizer::is_null() invoke val_int() to return correct values for
"NULL IN (SELECT ...)".
messed up
"ROW(...) IN (SELECT ... FROM DUAL)" always returned TRUE.
Item_in_subselect::row_value_transformer rewrites "ROW(...)
IN SELECT" conditions into the "EXISTS (SELECT ... HAVING ...)"
form.
For a subquery from the DUAL pseudotable resulting HAVING
condition is an expression on constant values, so further
transformation with optimize_cond() eliminates this HAVING
condition and resets JOIN::having to NULL.
Then JOIN::exec treated that NULL as an always-true-HAVING
and that caused a bug.
To distinguish an optimized out "HAVING TRUE" clause from
"HAVING FALSE" we already have the JOIN::having_value flag.
However, JOIN::exec() ignored JOIN::having_value as described
above as if it always set to COND_TRUE.
The JOIN::exec method has been modified to take into account
the value of the JOIN::having_value field.
BUG#42383 2009-01-28 lsoares
"This fails in embedded and on windows. Note that this test is not run
on windows and on embedded in PB for main trees currently"
