This is port of fix for MySQL BUG#17647863.
revno: 5572
revision-id: jon.hauglid@oracle.com-20131030232243-b0pw98oy72uka2sj
committer: Jon Olav Hauglid <jon.hauglid@oracle.com>
timestamp: Thu 2013-10-31 00:22:43 +0100
message:
Bug#17647863: MYSQL DOES NOT COMPILE ON OSX 10.9 GM
Rename test() macro to MY_TEST() to avoid conflict with libc++.
Flip the switch and create Item_cache based on the argument's cmp_type, not argument's result_type().
Fix subselect_engine to calculate cmp_type correctly
sql/item_subselect.h:
mdev:4284
This task fixes an ineffeciency that is a remainder from MySQL 5.0/5.1. There, subqueries
were optimized in a lazy manner, when executed for the first time. During this lazy optimization
it may happen that the server finds a more efficient subquery engine, and substitute the current
engine of the query being executed with the new engine. This required re-execution of the engine.
MariaDB 5.3 pre-optimizes subqueries in almost all cases, and the engine is chosen in most cases,
except when subquery materialization found that it must use partial matching. In this case, the
current code was performing one extra re-execution although it was not needed at all. The patch
performs the re-execution only if the engine was changed while executing.
In addition the patch performs small cleanup by removing "enum store_key_result" because it is
essentially a boolean, and the code that uses it already maps it to a boolean.
Analysis:
The queries in question use the [unique | index]_subquery execution methods.
These methods reuse the ref keys constructed by create_ref_for_key(). The
way create_ref_for_key() works is that it doesn't store in ref.key_copy[]
store_key elements that represent constants. In particular it doesn't store
the store_key for NULL constants.
The execution of [unique | index]_subquery calls
subselect_uniquesubquery_engine::copy_ref_key, which in addition to copy
the left IN argument into a index lookup key, is supposed to detect if
the left IN argument contains NULLs. Since the store_key for the NULL
constant is not copied into the key array, the null is not detected, and
execution erroneously proceeds as if it should look for a complete match.
Solution:
The solution (unlike MySQL) is to reuse already computed information about
NULL presence. Item_in_optimizer::val_int already finds out if the left IN
operand contains NULLs. The fix propagates this to the execution methods
subselect_[unique | index]subquery_engine::exec so it knows if there were
NULL values independent of the presence of keys.
In addition the patch siplifies copy_ref_key() and the logic that hanldes
the case of NULLs in the left IN operand.
Analysis:
The fix for bug lp:985667 implements the method Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result()
for all main kinds of subqueries. The purpose of this method is to be called from
return_zero_rows() and set Items to some default value in the case when a query
returns no rows. Aggregates and subqueries require special treatment in this case.
Every implementation of Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result() called
Item_subselect::make_const() to set the subquery predicate to its default value
irrespective of where the predicate was located in the query. Once the predicate
was set to a constant it was never executed.
At the same time, the JOIN object of the fake select for UNIONs (the one used for
the final result of the UNION), was set after all subqueries in the union were
executed. Since we set the subquery as constant, it was never executed, and the
corresponding JOIN was never created.
In order to decide whether the result of NOT IN is NULL or FALSE, Item_in_optimizer
needs to check if the subquery result was empty or not. This is where we got the
crash, because subselect_union_engine::no_rows() checks for
unit->fake_select_lex->join->send_records, and the join object was NULL.
Solution:
If a subquery is in the HAVING clause it must be evaluated in order to know its
result, so that we can properly filter the result records. Once subqueries in the
HAVING clause are executed even in the case of no result rows, this specific
crash will be solved, because the UNION will be executed, and its JOIN will be
constructed. Therefore the fix for this crash is to narrow the fix for lp:985667,
and to apply Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result() only when the subquery predicate
is in the SELECT clause.
Analysis:
The optimizer detects an empty result through constant table optimization.
Then it calls return_zero_rows(), which in turns calls inderctly
Item_maxmin_subselect::no_rows_in_result(). The latter method set "value=0",
however "value" is pointer to Item_cache, and not just an integer value.
All of the Item_[maxmin | singlerow]_subselect::val_XXX methods does:
if (forced_const)
return value->val_real();
which of course crashes when value is a NULL pointer.
Solution:
When the optimizer discovers an empty result set, set
Item_singlerow_subselect::value to a FALSE constant Item instead of NULL.
The patch enables back constant subquery execution during
query optimization after it was disabled during the development
of MWL#89 (cost-based choice of IN-TO-EXISTS vs MATERIALIZATION).
The main idea is that constant subqueries are allowed to be executed
during optimization if their execution is not expensive.
The approach is as follows:
- Constant subqueries are recursively optimized in the beginning of
JOIN::optimize of the outer query. This is done by the new method
JOIN::optimize_constant_subqueries(). This is done so that the cost
of executing these queries can be estimated.
- Optimization of the outer query proceeds normally. During this phase
the optimizer may request execution of non-expensive constant subqueries.
Each place where the optimizer may potentially execute an expensive
expression is guarded with the predicate Item::is_expensive().
- The implementation of Item_subselect::is_expensive has been extended
to use the number of examined rows (estimated by the optimizer) as a
way to determine whether the subquery is expensive or not.
- The new system variable "expensive_subquery_limit" controls how many
examined rows are considered to be not expensive. The default is 100.
In addition, multiple changes were needed to make this solution work
in the light of the changes made by MWL#89. These changes were needed
to fix various crashes and wrong results, and legacy bugs discovered
during development.
Analysis:
The reason for the wrong result is the interaction between constant
optimization (in this case 1-row table) and subquery optimization.
- First the outer query is optimized, and 'make_join_statistics' finds that
table t2 has one row, reads that row, and marks the whole table as constant.
This also means that all fields of t2 are constant.
- Next, we optimize the subquery in the end of the outer 'make_join_statistics'.
The field 'f2' is considered constant, with value '3'. The subquery predicate
is rewritten as the constant TRUE.
- The outer query execution detects early that the whole query result is empty
and calls 'return_zero_rows'. Since the query is with implicit grouping, we
have to produce one row with special values for the aggregates (depending on
each aggregate function), and NULL values for all non-aggregate fields. This
function calls 'no_rows_in_result' to set each aggregate function to the
default value when it aggregates over an empty result, and then calls
'send_data', which in turn evaluates each Item in the SELECT list.
- When evaluation reaches the subquery predicate, it executes the subquery
with field 'f2' having a constant value '3', and the subquery produces the
incorrect result '7'.
Solution:
Implement Item::no_rows_in_result for all subquery predicates. In order to
make this work, it is also needed to make all val_* methods of all subquery
predicates respect the Item_subselect::forced_const flag. Otherwise subqueries
are executed anyways, and override the default value set by no_rows_in_result
with whatever result is produced from the subquery evaluation.
- Let JTBM optimization code handle the case where the subquery is degenerate and doesn't have a
join query plan. Regular materialization would fall back to IN->EXISTS for such cases. Semi-Join
materialization does not have such option, instead we introduce and use "constant JTBM join tabs".
- Part 1 of the fix: for semi-join merged subqueries, calling child_join->optimize() until we're done with all
PS-lifetime optimizations in the parent.
Apart from the fix, the patch also adds few more unrelated test
cases for partial matching, and fixes few typos.
Analysis:
This bug uncovered that partial matching via rowid intersection
didn't handle the case when:
- the left IN argument has some NULLs,
- there are no non-null value matches, and there is no non-null
column,
- the subquery columns that are not covered with the NULLs in
the left IN argument contain at least one row, such that it
has NULL values in all columns where the left IN operand has
no NULLs.
In this case there is a partial match.
In addition the analysis of the related code uncovered incorrect
handling of few other related cases.
Solution:
The solution for the bug is to check if there exists a row with
NULLs in all columns other than the ones having NULL in the
let IN operand.
The check is implemented via checking whether the bitmaps that
store NULL information in class Ordered_key have a non-empty
intersection for the relevant columns.
The intersection itself is implemented via the function
bitmap_exists_intersection() in my_bitmap.c.
In MariaDB, when running in ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode,
the server produced in incorrect error message that there
is an aggregate function without GROUP BY, for artificially
created MIN/MAX functions during subquery MIN/MAX optimization.
The fix introduces a way to distinguish between artifially
created MIN/MAX functions as a result of a rewrite, and normal
ones present in the query. The test for ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY violation
now tests in addition if a MIN/MAX function was part of a MIN/MAX
subquery rewrite.
In order to be able to distinguish these MIN/MAX functions, the
patch introduces an additional flag in Item_in_subselect::in_strategy -
SUBS_STRATEGY_CHOSEN. This flag is set when the optimizer makes its
final choice of a subuqery strategy. In order to make the choice
consistent, access to Item_in_subselect::in_strategy is provided
via new class methods.
******
Fix MySQL BUG#12329653
In MariaDB, when running in ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode,
the server produced in incorrect error message that there
is an aggregate function without GROUP BY, for artificially
created MIN/MAX functions during subquery MIN/MAX optimization.
The fix introduces a way to distinguish between artifially
created MIN/MAX functions as a result of a rewrite, and normal
ones present in the query. The test for ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY violation
now tests in addition if a MIN/MAX function was part of a MIN/MAX
subquery rewrite.
In order to be able to distinguish these MIN/MAX functions, the
patch introduces an additional flag in Item_in_subselect::in_strategy -
SUBS_STRATEGY_CHOSEN. This flag is set when the optimizer makes its
final choice of a subuqery strategy. In order to make the choice
consistent, access to Item_in_subselect::in_strategy is provided
via new class methods.
sql/sql_insert.cc:
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
******
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
sql/sql_table.cc:
small cleanup
******
small cleanup
