The unsignedness of large integer user variables was not being
properly preserved when feeded to prepared statements. This was
happening because the unsigned flags wasn't being updated when
converting the user variable is converted to a parameter.
The solution is to copy the unsigned flag when converting the
user variable to a parameter and take the unsigned flag into
account when converting the integer to a string.
The out of memory error was thrown when the sort buffer size were too small.
This led to a user confusion.
Now filesort throws the error message about sort buffer being too small.
The bug was that handler::clone/handler::ha_open() call caused allocation of
cloned_copy->ref on the handler->table->mem_root. The allocated memory could not
be reclaimed until the table is flushed, so it was possible to exhaust memory by
repeatedly running index_merge queries without doing table flushes.
The fix:
- make handler::clone() allocate new_handler->ref on the passed mem_root
- make handler::ha_open() not allocate this->ref if it has already been allocated
There is no testcase as it is not possible to check small leaks from testsuite.
and my_innodb_commit_concurrency global variables.
Type of the my_innodb_autoextend_increment and the
my_innodb_commit_concurrency variables has been changed to
GET_ULONG.
Server handles truncation for assignment of too-long values
into CHAR/VARCHAR/TEXT columns in a different ways when the
truncated characters are spaces:
1. CHAR(N) columns silently ignore end-space truncation;
2. TEXT columns post a truncation warning/error in the
non-strict/strict mode.
3. VARCHAR columns always post a truncation note in
any mode.
Space truncation processing has been synchronised over
CHAR/VARCHAR/TEXT columns: current behavior of VARCHAR
columns has been propagated as standard.
Binary-encoded string/BLOB columns are not affected.
to leave
The artifact was caused by
a flaw in concurrent accessing the slave's io thd by
the io itself and a handling show slave status thread.
Namely, show_master_info did not acquire mi->run_lock mutex that is
specified for mi->io_thd member.
Fixed with deploying the mutex locking and unlocking. The mutex is kept
short time and without interleaving with mi->data_lock mutex.
Todo: to report and fix an issue with
sys_var_slave_skip_counter::{methods}
seem to acquire incorrectly
active_mi->rli.run_lock
instead of the specified
active_mi->rli.data_lock
A test case is difficult to compose, so rpl_packet should continue serving
as the indicator.
does not use trans tables
There had been two issues.
Rollback statement was recorded in binlog even though a multi-update
had not modified any non-transactional table.
The reason for this artifact was a false initial value of multi_update::transactional_tables.
Yet another artifact that explained on the bug page is that
`ha_autocommit_or_rollback' works differently depending on whether
a transaction engine has been compiled in.
Fixed: with setting multi_update::transactional_tables to zero at initialization
time. Multi-update on non-trans table won't cause ROLLBACK in binlog with
either compilation option.
The 2nd mentioned artifact comprises a self-standing issue (to be reported
separately).
the reason for the failure were incorrect asserts.
Removing asserts altogether as there is no the implication does not hold
(as explained in the comments for the file).
Problem: some collation handlers called incorrect version
of my_like_range_xxx(), which led to wrong min_str and max_str,
so like range optimizer threw away good records.
Fix: changing the wrong handlers to call proper version of
my_like_range_xxx().
When issuing a column level grant on a table which require pre-locking the
server crashed.
The reason behind the crash was that data structures used by the lock api
wasn't properly reinitialized in the case of a column level grant.
on table creates
The problem was in incompatible syntax for key definition in CREATE
TABLE.
5.0 supports only the following syntax for key definition (see "CREATE
TABLE syntax" in the manual):
{INDEX|KEY} [index_name] [index_type] (index_col_name,...)
While 5.1 parser supports the above syntax, the "preferred" syntax was
changed to:
{INDEX|KEY} [index_name] (index_col_name,...) [index_type]
The above syntax is used in 5.1 for the SHOW CREATE TABLE output, which
led to dumps generated by 5.1 being incompatible with 5.0.
Fixed by changing the parser in 5.0 to support both 5.0 and 5.1 syntax
for key definition.
