Currently the loose scan code in opt_range.cc considers all indexes as
possible for the access method. Due to inexact statistics it may happen
that a loose scan is selected over a unique index.
This is clearly wrong since a "loose scan" over a unique index will read
the same keys as a direct index scan, but the loose scan has more overhead.
This task adds a rule to skip unique indexes for loose scan.
Analysis:
The cause of the valgrind warning was an attempt to evaluate a Field that was not yet read.
The reason was that on one hand Item_func_isnotnull was marked as constant by
Item_func_isnotnull::update_used_tables, and this allowed eval_const_cond() to be called.
On the other hand Item_func_isnotnull::val_int() evaluated its argument as if it was not
constant.
Solution:
The fix make sure that Item_func_isnotnull::val_int() doesn't evaluate its argument when
it is constant and cannot be NULL, because the result is known in this case.
When a GTID event is executed, we remember the contained GTID position so that
when we have applied the entire event group we can commit it to
gtid_slave_pos.
However, if the event group fails to apply due to some error and the SQL
thread aborts, the code did not correctly clear the remembered GTID. Thus,
when SQL thread was restarted, the old GTID of the failing event group was
incorrectly updated to gtid_slave_pos when the initial rotate event was
executed, corrupting the GTID position.
After single row substitutions there might appear new equalities.
They should be properly propagated to all AND/OR levels the WHERE
condition. It's done now with an additional call of remove_eq_conds().
The main bug here was the following situation:
Suppose we set up a completely new master2 as an extra multi-master to an
existing slave that already has a different master1 for domain_id=0. When the
slave tries to connect to master2, master2 will not have anything that slave
requests in domain_id=0, but that is fine as master2 is supposedly meant to
serve eg. domain_id=1. (This is MDEV-4485).
But suppose that master2 then actually starts sending events from
domain_id=0. In this case, the fix for MDEV-4485 was incomplete, and the code
would fail to give the error that the position requested by the slave in
domain_id=0 was missing from the binlogs of master2. This could lead to lost
events or completely wrong replication.
The patch for this bug fixes this issue.
In addition, it cleans up the code a bit, getting rid of the fake_gtid_hash in
the code. And the error message when slave and master have diverged due to
alternate future is clarified, as requested in the bug description.
This patch almost totally revised the patch for bug mdev-4177.
The latter had too many defects. In particular, it did not
propagate multiple equalities formed when merging a degenerate
disjunct into underlying AND formula.
This a an old legacy performance bug.
When a very selective range scan existed for the second table in a join,
and, at the same time, there was another range condition depending on the
fields of the first table, the optimizer chose a plan with
'Range checked for each record'. This plan was extremely inefficient in
comparison with the regular selective range scan.
As a matter of fact the range scan chosen for each record was the same as
that selective range scan.
Changed the test case for bug 24776 to preserve the old output for explain.
MDEV-4812 Valgrind warnings (Invalid write) in dynamic_column_update_many on COLUMN_ADD
Fixed problem of working on wrong data (do not allow offset to out of string length).
fix_field() call protocol was brocken (zero pointer passed as link to item which is possible only if you are sure that there can not be Items which transforms).
- Modify the way Item_cond::fix_fields() and Item_cond::eval_not_null_tables()
calculate bitmap for Item_cond_or::not_null_tables():
if they see a "... OR inexpensive_const_false_item OR ..." then the item can
be ignored.
- Updated test results. There can be more warnings produced since parts of WHERE
are evaluated more times.
In the case of loose scan used as input for order by, end_send()
didn't detect correctly that a loose scan was used, and didn't copy
the non-aggregated fields from the temp table used for ORDER BY.
The fix uses the fact that the quick select used for sorting is
attached to JOIN::pre_sort_join_tab instead of JOIN::join_tab.
Backport the fix olav.sandstaa@sun.com-20101102184747-qfuntqwj021imy9r:
"Fix for Bug#52660 Perf. regr. using ICP for MyISAM on range queries on an index containing TEXT"
(together with further fixes in that code) into MyISAM and Aria.
Apply the patch from Patryk Pomykalski:
- create_internal_tmp_table_from_heap() will now return information whether
the last row that we tried to write was a duplicate row.
(mysql-5.6 also has this change)
- merge_same_index_scans() may put the same SEL_ARG tree in multiple result plans.
make it call incr_refs() on the SEL_ARG trees that it does key_or() on, because
key_or(sel_arg_tree_1, sel_arg_tree_2) call may invalidate SEL_ARG trees pointed
by sel_arg_tree_1 and sel_arg_tree_2.
When a new master is provisioned that does not have any old binlogs,
the @@gtid_slave_pos is used to know where in the GTID history the
provisioning happened. A slave is allowed to connect at the point of
this value of @@gtid_slave_pos, even if that GTID is not in the
binlogs on the new master.
The code to handle this case when the binlog on the newly provisioned
master is completely empty was just wrong (couple of typos). Clearly it
had never been tested ... :-/
When a new master is provisioned that does not have any old binlogs,
the @@gtid_slave_pos is used to know where in the GTID history the
provisioning happened. A slave is allowed to connect at the point of
this value of @@gtid_slave_pos, even if that GTID is not in the
binlogs on the new master.
But --gtid-strict-mode did not correctly handle this case. When strict
mode was enabled, an attempt to connect at the position would cause an
error about holes in the binlog, which is not correct.
This patch adds a hash of GTIDs that need to be treated specially by
GTID strict mode to deal correctly with this case.
