bug. It added this assert;
ut_ad(ind_field->prefix_len);
before a section of code that assumes there is a prefix_len.
The patch replaced code that explicitly avoided this with a check for
prefix_len. It turns out that the purge thread can get to that assert
without a prefix_len because it does not use a row_ext_t* .
When UNIV_DEBUG is not defined, the affect of this is that the purge thread
sets the dfield->len to zero and then cannot find the entry in the index to
purge. So secondary index entries remain unpurged.
This patch does not do the assert. Instead, it uses
'if (ind_field->prefix_len) {...}'
around the section of code that assumes a prefix_len. This is the way the
patch I provided to Marko did it.
The test case is simply modified to do a sleep(10) in order to give the
purge thread a chance to run. Without the code change to row0row.c, this
modified testcase will assert if InnoDB was compiled with UNIV_DEBUG.
I tried to sleep(5), but it did not always assert.
row_build_index_entry(): In innodb_file_format=Barracuda
(ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC or ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED), a secondary index on a
full column can refer to a field that is stored off-page in the
clustered index record. Take that into account.
rb:692 approved by Jimmy Yang
With this change, the index prefix column length lifted from 767 bytes
to 3072 bytes if "innodb_large_prefix" is set to "true".
rb://603 approved by Marko
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The
same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock
that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a
read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will
only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
sense for connection-local objects.
2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ...
READ.
Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make
them unviable for stable versions of server.
So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
lock. In 5.5 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
lock is done on SQL-layer.
mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
sql/sql_parse.cc:
Since a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated even
if it was only locked for read we always request TL_WRITE locks
for such tables at LOCK TABLES time. This allows to avoid
discrepancy between locks acquired at LOCK TABLES time and by
a statement executed under LOCK TABLES. Such a discrepancy has
caused problems for InnoDB storage engine.
To support this change a part of code implementing LOCK TABLES
has been moved to a helper function.
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The
same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock
that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a
read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will
only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
sense for connection-local objects.
2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ...
READ.
Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make
them unviable for stable versions of server.
So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
lock. In 5.1 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
lock is done inside of InnoDBs handler methods as doing it on
SQL-layer causes compatibility troubles with FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK.
mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should
be always requested for such tables.
storage/innodb_plugin/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should
be always requested for such tables.
Problem: MYSQL_BIN_LOG::reset_logs acquires mutexes in wrong order.
The correct order is first LOCK_thread_count and then LOCK_log. This function
does it the other way around. This leads to deadlock when run in parallel
with a thread that takes the two locks in correct order. For example, a thread
that disconnects will take the locks in the correct order.
Fix: change order of the locks in MYSQL_BIN_LOG::reset_logs:
first LOCK_thread_count and then LOCK_log.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_reset_master.result:
added result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_reset_master.test:
Added test case that demonstrates deadlock because of wrong mutex order.
The deadlock is between two threads:
- RESET MASTER acquires mutexes in wrong order.
- client thread shutdown code acquires mutexes in right order.
Actually, this test case does not produce deadlock in 5.1, probably
the client thread shutdown code does not hold both mutexes at the same
time. However, the bug existed in 5.1 (mutexes are taken in the wrong
order) so we push the test case to 5.1 too, to prevent future
regressions.
sql/log.cc:
Change mutex acquisition to the correct order:
first LOCK_thread_count, then LOCK_log.
sql/mysqld.cc:
Add debug code to synchronize test case.
Manual merged mysql-5.1-gca into latest mysql-5.5.
Conflicts
=========
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_relayspace.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_relayspace.test
VM-WIN2003-32-A, SLES10-IA64-A
The test case waits for master_pos_wait not to timeout, which
means that the deadlock between SQL and IO threads was
succesfully and automatically dealt with.
However, very rarely, master_pos_wait reports a timeout. This
happens because the time set for master_pos_wait to wait was
too small (6 seconds). On slow test env this could be a
problem.
We fix this by setting the timeout inline with the one used
in sync_slave_with_master (300 seconds). In addition we
refactored the test case and refined some comments.
.-> USING PASSWORD: NO
The server was always setting the flag for using password to NO and
then relying on the server authentication plugin to update it if it uses
a password.
This creates compatibility problems with 5.1 when rejecting a
nonexistent user login.
Set the default for the password supplied flag for non-existing users
as the default plugin (native password authentication) would do it
for compatibility reasons.
Test case added.
federated.result updated with the correct error message.
Before this fix, the test performance_schema.relaylog would fail
with sporadic failures related to statistics on update_cond.
The reason for these failures is that thread scheduling makes
impossible to predict if instrumented conditions will be used on not.
The fix is to relax the test case, to not collect statistics about:
- wait/synch/cond/sql/MYSQL_BIN_LOG::update_cond
- wait/synch/cond/sql/MYSQL_RELAY_LOG::update_cond
DB_COL_APPEARS_TWICE_IN_INDEX: Remove. This condition is already
checked and reported by MySQL before passing the index definition to
the storage engine.
row_create_index_for_mysql(): Remove the redundant check for
DB_COL_APPEARS_TWICE_IN_INDEX. When enforcing the column prefix index
limit, invoke dict_mem_index_free(index) to plug the memory leak. In
the loop, use index->n_def instead of dict_index_get_n_fields(index),
because the latter would be 0 for indexes that have not been copied to
the data dictionary cache.
innodb-use-sys-malloc.test:
Add test cases for attempting to trigger the error checks in
row_create_index_for_mysql(). Before MySQL 5.5 and WL#5743, the leak
is only reproducible if ha_innobase::max_supported_key_part_length()
returned a higher limit than the one used in
row_create_index_for_mysql().
In MySQL 5.5 and later, the leak is reproducible with
innodb_large_prefix=true.
rb:688 approved by Jimmy Yang
Fix a failure of the re-enabled innodb-index.test in the embedded server.
Apparently, the embedded server does not default to ENGINE=InnoDB when
copying an InnoDB table by CREATE TABLE t2 SELECT * FROM t1;
Re-enable a test that was disabled as collateral damage.
Starting with MySQL 5.5, queries will acquire and hold a shared meta-data lock
(MDL) on tables they process, until the transaction is committed or
rolled back. This will prevent DDL operations on the tables, such as creating
an index.
innodb-index.test: Use a second table for creating the index. The index will
still be "too new" for the transaction that was started before the index
creation was started.
Bug 12430414 - THE TEST PERFSCHEMA.SELECTS.TEST CAN AFFECT SUCCEEDING TESTS
Bug 12430599 - THE TEST PERFSCHEMA.ONE_THREAD_PER_CON. CAN AFFECT SUCCEEDING TESTS
Bug 12431153 - THE TEST PERFSCHEMA.PFS_UPGRADE CAN AFFECT SUCCEEDING TEST
This assert could be triggered during two phase commit if binary
log was used as transaction coordinator log. The triggered assert
checks that the same number of transaction IDs are processed in
the prepare and commit phases.
The reason it was triggered, was that the transaction consisted
of an INSERT/UPDATE IGNORE that had an ignorable error. Since it
had an error, no row log events were made and therefore
prepared_xids was 0. However, since it was an IGNORE statement,
the statement started a read/write statement transaction, committed
it and completed successfully.
This patch fixes the problem by adjusting the assert to take
this possibility into account.
Test case added to binlog.binlog_innodb_row.test.
If LOAD DATA INFILE featured a SET clause, the name=value pairs
would be regenerated using item::print. Unfortunately, that code
is mostly optimized for EXPLAIN EXTENDED output and such, and can
not be relied on to return valid SQL.
We now name each value its original, user-supplied form and use
that to create LOAD DATA INFILE statements for statement-based
replication.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.result:
minor change in syntactic sugar
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddatalocal.result:
add test case
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_loaddatalocal.test:
add test case
sql/sql_load.cc:
Do not try to item::print values in LOAD DATA INFILE's
SET clause; they might not even be valid SQL at this
point. Use our saved version instead.
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
If LOAD DATA INFILE has SET name=val clauses, tag the
individual val-parts with the user's version so we can
later replicate that, rather than the smashed pieces
we'd get from item::print once the optimizer's through
with our poor values.
- add support for choosing the engine of test
table(t1) with $engine_type
- add primary key to the test table(t1) to support
replication of BLOB/TEXT (also with ENGINE=ndb)
- change the suppression since the warning printed to error log
now says "Column 1"
IN WAIT_SHOW_CONDITION)
There was a typo in the name of one of the parameters to the
include file wait_show_condition. The parameter name was being
set to "connection" instead of "condition".
We fix this typo, improve one instruction in the test case and
deploy parameter checks inside wait_show_condition.inc.
Manual merge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.
Conflicts
=========
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_until.test
Text conflict in sql/handler.h
Text conflict in storage/archive/ha_archive.cc
The innoDB global variable srv_lower_case_table_names is set to the value of lower_case_table_names declared in mysqld.h server in ha_innodb.cc. Since this variable can change at runtime, it is reset for each handler call to ::create, ::open, ::rename_table & ::delete_table.
But it is possible for tables to be implicitly opened before an explicit handler call is made when an engine is first started or restarted. I was able to reproduce that with the testcase in this patch on a version of InnoDB from 2 weeks ago. It seemed like the change buffer entries for the secondary key was getting put into pages after the restart. (But I am not sure, I did not write down the call stack while it was reproducing.) In the current code, the implicit open, which is actually a call to dict_load_foreigns(), does not occur with this testcase.
The change is to replace srv_lower_case_table_names by an interface function in innodb.cc that retrieves the server global variable when it is needed.
