Problem: Many test cases don't clean up after themselves (fail
to drop tables or fail to reset variables). This implies that:
(1) check-testcase in the new mtr that currently lives in
5.1-rpl failed. (2) it may cause unexpected results in
subsequent tests.
Fix: make all tests clean up.
Also: cleaned away unnecessary output in rpl_packet.result
Also: fixed bug where rpl_log called RESET MASTER with a running
slave. This is not supposed to work.
Also: removed unnecessary code from rpl_stm_EE_err2 and made it
verify that an error occurred.
Also: removed unnecessary code from rpl_ndb_ctype_ucs2_def.
If a binlog file is manually replaced with a namesake directory the internal purging did
not handle the error of deleting the file so that eventually
a post-execution guards fires an assert.
Fixed with reusing a snippet of code for bug@18199 to tolerate lack of the file but no other error
at an attempt to delete it.
The same applied to the index file deletion.
The cset carries pieces of manual merging.
using a trig in SP
For all 5.0 and up to 5.1.12 exclusive, when a stored routine or
trigger caused an INSERT into an AUTO_INCREMENT column, the
generated AUTO_INCREMENT value should not be written into the
binary log, which means if a statement does not generate
AUTO_INCREMENT value itself, there will be no Intvar event (SET
INSERT_ID) associated with it even if one of the stored routine
or trigger caused generation of such a value. And meanwhile, when
executing a stored routine or trigger, it would ignore the
INSERT_ID value even if there is a INSERT_ID value available set
by a SET INSERT_ID statement.
Starting from MySQL 5.1.12, the generated AUTO_INCREMENT value is
written into the binary log, and the value will be used if
available when executing the stored routine or trigger.
Prior fix of this bug in MySQL 5.0 and prior MySQL 5.1.12
(referenced as the buggy versions in the text below), when a
statement that generates AUTO_INCREMENT value by the top
statement was executed in the body of a SP, all statements in the
SP after this statement would be treated as if they had generated
AUTO_INCREMENT by the top statement. When a statement that did
not generate AUTO_INCREMENT value by the top statement but by a
function/trigger called by it, an erroneous Intvar event would be
associated with the statement, this erroneous INSERT_ID value
wouldn't cause problem when replicating between masters and
slaves of 5.0.x or prior 5.1.12, because the erroneous INSERT_ID
value was not used when executing functions/triggers. But when
replicating from buggy versions to 5.1.12 or newer, which will
use the INSERT_ID value in functions/triggers, the erroneous
value will be used, which would cause duplicate entry error and
cause the slave to stop.
The patch for 5.1 fixed it to ignore the SET INSERT_ID value when
executing functions/triggers if it is replicating from a master
of buggy versions, another patch for 5.0 fixed it not to generate
the erroneous Intvar event.
