PLATFORM= MACOSX10.6 X86_64 MAX
Problem: The test was failing on pb2's mac machine because
it was not cleaned up properly. The test checks if
the command 'start slave until' throws a proper
error when issued with a wrong number/type of
parameters. After this,the replication stream was
stopped using the include file 'rpl_end.inc'.
The errors thrown earlier left the slave in an
inconsistent state to be closed by the include
file which was caught by the mac machine.
Fix: Started slave by invoking start_slave.inc to have a
working slave before calling rpl_reset.inc
Problem: The test file was not in a good shape. It tested
start slave until relay log file/pos combination
wrongly. A couple of commands were executed at
master and replicated at slave. Next, the
coordinates in terms of relay log file and pos
were noted down followed by reset slave and start
slave until saved relay log file/pos. Reset slave
deletes all relay log files and makes the slave
forget its replication position. So, using the
saved coordiantes after reset slave is wrong.
Fix: Split the test in two parts:
a) Test for start slave until master log file/pos and
checking for correct errors in the failure
scenarios.
b) Test for start slave until relay log file/pos.
Problem: The variables auto_increment_increment and
auto_increment_offset were set in the the include
file rpl_init.inc. This was only configured for
some connections that are rarely used by test
cases, so likely that it will cause confusion.
If replication tests want to setup these variables
they should do so explicitly.
Fix:
a) Removed code to set the variables
auto_increment_increment and auto_increment_offset
in the include file.
b) Updated tests files using the same.
post push fix:
rpl_stm_until.test was disabled because of
this bug. Enabled and fixed it.
Removed a part of the test that was obsolete.
It tested replication from 4.0 master to 5.0
slave.
post push fix:
rpl_stm_until.test was disabled because of
this bug. Enabled and fixed it.
Removed a part of the test that was obsolete.
It tested replication from 4.0 master to 5.0
slave.
DOWNGRADED FROM 5.6.11 TO 5.6.10
Problem was new syntax not accepted by previous version.
Fixed by adding version comment of /*!50531 around the
new syntax.
Like this in the .frm file:
'PARTITION BY KEY /*!50611 ALGORITHM = 2 */ () PARTITIONS 3'
and also changing the output from SHOW CREATE TABLE to:
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT)
/*!50100 PARTITION BY KEY */ /*!50611 ALGORITHM = 1 */ /*!50100 ()
PARTITIONS 3 */
It will always add the ALGORITHM into the .frm for KEY [sub]partitioned
tables, but for SHOW CREATE TABLE it will only add it in case it is the non
default ALGORITHM = 1.
Also notice that for 5.5, it will say /*!50531 instead of /*!50611, which
will make upgrade from 5.5 > 5.5.31 to 5.6 < 5.6.11 fail!
If one downgrades an fixed version to the same major version (5.5 or 5.6) the
bug 14521864 will be visible again, but unless the .frm is updated, it will
work again when upgrading again.
Also fixed so that the .frm does not get updated version
if a single partition check passes.
Analysis:
Range analysis detects that the subquery is expensive and doesn't
build a range access method. Later, the applicability test for loose
scan doesn't take that into account, and builds a loose scan method
without a range scan on the min/max column. As a result loose scan
fetches the first key in each group, rather than the first key that
satisfies the condition on the min/max column.
Solution:
Since there is no SEL_ARG tree to be used for the min/max column,
it is not possible to use loose scan if the min/max column is compared
with an expensive scalar subquery. Make the test for loose scan
applicability to be in sync with the range analysis code by testing if
the min/max argument is compared with an expensive predicate.
Problem: Sys_vars suite is disabled in mysql-5.1 branch.
Fix: To enable sys_vars suite in mysql-5.1, add it in
mysql-test-run.pl file and also sys_vars suite should be
added to Makefile.am inorder to get that test directory
This bug happened because the executor tried to use a wrong
TABLE REF object when building access keys. It constructed
keys from fields of a materialized table from a ref object
created to construct keys from the fields of the underlying
base table. This could happen only when materialized table
was created for a non-correlated IN subquery and only
when the materialized table used for lookups.
In this case we are guaranteed to be able to construct the
keys from the fields of tables that would be outer tables
for the tables of the IN subquery.
The patch makes sure that no ref objects constructed from
fields of materialized lookup tables are to be used.
SUITE FOR 5.1
SYS_VARS suite is not enabled in MTR by default
run. Enabling it with this check-in.
mysql-test/suite/sys_vars/t/disabled.def:
Till the bugs are fixed, disabling the failed test scripts
Analys:
The cause for the wrong result was that the optimizer
incorrectly chose min/max loose scan when it is not
applicable. The applicability test missed the case when
a condition on the MIN/MAX argument was OR-ed with a
condition on some other field. In this case, the MIN/MAX
condition cannot be used for loose scan.
Solution:
Extend the test check_group_min_max_predicates() to check
that the WHERE clause is of the form: "cond1 AND cond2"
where
cond1 - does not use min_max_column at all.
cond2 - is an AND/OR tree with leaves in form "min_max_column $CMP$ const"
or $CMP$ is one of the functions between, is [not] null
Analysis:
Range analysis discoveres that the query can be executed via loose index scan for GROUP BY.
Later, GROUP BY analysis fails to confirm that the GROUP operation can be computed via an
index because there is no logic to handle duplicate field references in the GROUP clause.
As a result the optimizer produces an inconsistent plan. It constructs a temporary table,
but on the other hand the group fields are not set to point there.
Solution:
Make loose scan analysis work in sync with order by analysis. In the case of duplicate
columns loose scan will not be applicable. This limitation will be lifted in 10.0 by
removing duplicate columns.
innodb_bug12400341.test is disabled for valgrind daily test.
It might be affected by the previous test's undo slots existing,
because of slower execution.
Backport of fix for Bug#13581962
mysql-test/r/cast.result:
Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/r/ctype_utf8mb4.result:
Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/t/cast.test:
Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/t/ctype_utf8mb4.test:
Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
sql/item_func.h:
limit max length by MY_INT64_NUM_DECIMAL_DIGITS
Backport of Bug#13581962
mysql-test/r/cast.result:
Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
mysql-test/t/cast.test:
Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
sql/item_func.h:
limit max length by MY_INT64_NUM_DECIMAL_DIGITS
Due to an internal change in the server code in between 5.1 and 5.5
(wl#2649) the hash function used in KEY partitioning changed
for numeric and date/time columns (from binary hash calculation
to character based hash calculation).
Also enum/set changed from latin1 ci based hash calculation to
binary hash between 5.1 and 5.5. (bug#11759782).
These changes makes KEY [sub]partitioned tables on any of
the affected column types incompatible with 5.5 and above,
since the calculation of partition id differs.
Also since InnoDB asserts that a deleted row was previously
read (positioned), the server asserts on delete of a row that
is in the wrong partition.
The solution for this situation is:
1) The partitioning engine will check that delete/update will go to the
partition the row was read from and give an error otherwise, consisting
of the rows partitioning fields. This will avoid asserts in InnoDB and
also alert the user that there is a misplaced row. A detailed error
message will be given, including an entry to the error log consisting
of both table name, partition and row content (PK if exists, otherwise
all partitioning columns).
2) A new optional syntax for KEY () partitioning in 5.5 is allowed:
[SUB]PARTITION BY KEY [ALGORITHM = N] (list_of_cols)
Where N = 1 uses the same hashing as 5.1 (Numeric/date/time fields uses
binary hashing, ENUM/SET uses charset hashing) N = 2 uses the same
hashing as 5.5 (Numeric/date/time fields uses charset hashing,
ENUM/SET uses binary hashing). If not set on CREATE/ALTER it will
default to 2.
This new syntax should probably be ignored by NDB.
3) Since there is a demand for avoiding scanning through the full
table, during upgrade the ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY ... command is
considered a no-op (only .frm change) if everything except ALGORITHM
is the same and ALGORITHM was not set before, which allows manually
upgrading such table by something like:
ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 () or
ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 2 ()
4) Enhanced partitioning with CHECK/REPAIR to also check for/repair
misplaced rows. (Also works for ALTER TABLE t CHECK/REPAIR PARTITION)
CHECK FOR UPGRADE:
If the .frm version is < 5.5.3
and uses KEY [sub]partitioning
and an affected column type
then it will fail with an message:
KEY () partitioning changed, please run:
ALTER TABLE `test`.`t1` PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 (a)
PARTITIONS 12
(i.e. current partitioning clause, with the addition of
ALGORITHM = 1)
CHECK without FOR UPGRADE:
if MEDIUM (default) or EXTENDED options are given:
Scan all rows and verify that it is in the correct partition.
Fail for the first misplaced row.
REPAIR:
if default or EXTENDED (i.e. not QUICK/USE_FRM):
Scan all rows and every misplaced row is moved into its correct
partitions.
5) Updated mysqlcheck (called by mysql_upgrade) to handle the
new output from CHECK FOR UPGRADE, to run the ALTER statement
instead of running REPAIR.
This will allow mysql_upgrade (or CHECK TABLE t FOR UPGRADE) to upgrade
a KEY [sub]partitioned table that has any affected field type
and a .frm version < 5.5.3 to ALGORITHM = 1 without rebuild.
Also notice that if the .frm has a version of >= 5.5.3 and ALGORITHM
is not set, it is not possible to know if it consists of rows from
5.1 or 5.5! In these cases I suggest that the user does:
(optional)
LOCK TABLE t WRITE;
SHOW CREATE TABLE t;
(verify that it has no ALGORITHM = N, and to be safe, I would suggest
backing up the .frm file, to be used if one need to change to another
ALGORITHM = N, without needing to rebuild/repair)
ALTER TABLE t <old partitioning clause, but with ALGORITHM = N>;
which should set the ALGORITHM to N (if the table has rows from
5.1 I would suggest N = 1, otherwise N = 2)
CHECK TABLE t;
(here one could use the backed up .frm instead and change to a new N
and run CHECK again and see if it passes)
and if there are misplaced rows:
REPAIR TABLE t;
(optional)
UNLOCK TABLES;
from MariaDB 10.0.
The bug in mdev-3948 was an instance of the problem fixed by Sergey's patch
in 10.0 - namely that the range optimizer could change table->[read | write]_set,
and not restore it.
revno: 3471
committer: Sergey Petrunya <psergey@askmonty.org>
branch nick: 10.0-serg-fix-imerge
timestamp: Sat 2012-11-03 12:24:36 +0400
message:
# MDEV-3817: Wrong result with index_merge+index_merge_intersection, InnoDB table, join, AND and OR conditions
Reconcile the fixes from:
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20110805143029-ywrzuz15uzgontr0
# Fix for BUG#12698916 - "JOIN QUERY GIVES WRONG RESULT AT 2ND EXEC. OR
# AFTER FLUSH TABLES [-INT VS NULL]"
#
# guilhem.bichot@oracle.com-20111209150650-tzx3ldzxe1yfwji6
# Fix for BUG#12912171 - ASSERTION FAILED: QUICK->HEAD->READ_SET == SAVE_READ_SET
# and
#
and related fixes from: BUG#1006164, MDEV-376:
Now, ROR-merged QUICK_RANGE_SELECT objects make no assumptions about the values
of table->read_set and table->write_set.
Each QUICK_ROR_SELECT has (and had before) its own column bitmap, but now, all
QUICK_ROR_SELECT's functions that care: reset(), init_ror_merged_scan(), and
get_next() will set table->read_set when invoked and restore it back to what
it was before the call before they return.
This allows to avoid the mess when somebody else modifies table->read_set for
some reason.
PROPERLY QUOTED IN BINLOG FILE
Problem: In load data file query, User variables are allowed
inside "Into_list" and "Set_list". These user variables used
inside these two lists are not properly guarded with backticks
while server is writting into binlog. Hence user variable names
like a` cannot be used in this context.
Fix: Properly quote these variables while
writting into binlog
mysql-test/r/func_compress.result:
changing result file
mysql-test/r/variables.result:
changing result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.result:
changing result file
sql/item_func.cc:
Quote the user variable items
The problem was that a temporary table was re-created as a non-temporary table.
mysql-test/suite/maria/truncate.result:
Added test cases
mysql-test/suite/maria/truncate.test:
Added test cases
sql/sql_truncate.cc:
Mark that table to be created is a temporary table
storage/maria/ha_maria.cc:
Ensure that temporary tables are not transactional.
reached by fix_fields() (via reference) before row which it belongs to (on the second execution)
and fix_field for row did not follow usual protocol for Items with argument
(first check that the item fixed then call fix_fields).
Item_row::fix_field fixed.
allow only three failed change_user per connection.
successful change_user do NOT reset the counter
tests/mysql_client_test.c:
make --error to work for --change_user errors
