Bug#21025 (misleading error message when creating functions named 'x', or 'y')
Bug#22619 (Spaces considered harmful)
This change contains a fix to report warnings or errors, and multiple tests
cases.
Before this fix, name collisions between:
- Native functions
- User Defined Functions
- Stored Functions
were not systematically reported, leading to confusing behavior.
I) Native / User Defined Function
Before this fix, is was possible to create a UDF named "foo", with the same
name as a native function "foo", but it was impossible to invoke the UDF,
since the syntax "foo()" always refer to the native function.
After this fix, creating a UDF fails with an error if there is a name
collision with a native function.
II) Native / Stored Function
Before this fix, is was possible to create a SF named "db.foo", with the same
name as a native function "foo", but this was confusing since the syntax
"foo()" would refer to the native function. To refer to the Stored Function,
the user had to use the "db.foo()" syntax.
After this fix, creating a Stored Function reports a warning if there is a
name collision with a native function.
III) User Defined Function / Stored Function
Before this fix, creating a User Defined Function "foo" and a Stored Function
"db.foo" are mutually exclusive operations. Whenever the second function is
created, an error is reported. However, the test suite did not cover this
behavior.
After this fix, the behavior is unchanged, and is now covered by test cases.
Note that the code change in this patch depends on the fix for Bug 21114.
The problem was that THD::row_count_func was zeroed too. It was zeroed
as a fix for bug 4905 "Stored procedure doesn't clear for "Rows affected"
However, the proper solution is not to zero, because THD::row_count_func has
been set to -1 already in mysql_execute_command(), a later fix, which obsoletes
the incorrect fix of #4095
This patch reverts a change introduced by Bug 6951, which incorrectly
set thd->abort_on_warning for stored procedures.
As per internal discussions about the SQL_MODE=TRADITIONAL,
the correct behavior is to *not* abort on warnings even inside an INSERT/UPDATE
trigger.
Tests for Stored Procedures, Stored Functions, Triggers involving SQL_MODE
have been included or revised, to reflect the intended behavior.
(reposting approved patch, to work around source control issues, no review needed)
The syntax of the CALL statement, to invoke a stored procedure, has been
changed to make the use of parenthesis optional in the argument list.
With this change, "CALL p;" is equivalent to "CALL p();".
While the SQL spec does not explicitely mandate this syntax, supporting it
is needed for practical reasons, for integration with JDBC / ODBC connectors.
Also, warnings in the sql/sql_yacc.yy file, which were not reported by Bison 2.1
but are now reported by Bison 2.2, have been fixed.
The warning found were:
bison -y -p MYSQL -d --debug --verbose sql_yacc.yy
sql_yacc.yy:653.9-18: warning: symbol UNLOCK_SYM redeclared
sql_yacc.yy:656.9-17: warning: symbol UNTIL_SYM redeclared
sql_yacc.yy:658.9-18: warning: symbol UPDATE_SYM redeclared
sql_yacc.yy:5169.11-5174.11: warning: unused value: $2
sql_yacc.yy:5208.11-5220.11: warning: unused value: $5
sql_yacc.yy:5221.11-5234.11: warning: unused value: $5
conflicts: 249 shift/reduce
"unused value: $2" correspond to the $$=$1 assignment in the 1st {} block
in table_ref -> join_table {} {},
which does not procude a result ($$) for the rule but an intermediate $2
value for the action instead.
"unused value: $5" are similar, with $$ assignments in {} actions blocks
which are not for the final reduce.
There was possible stack overrun in an edge case which handles invalid body of
a SP in mysql.proc . That should be case when mysql.proc has been changed
manually. Though, due to bug 21513, it can be exploited without having access
to mysql.proc only being able to create a stored routine.
containing a select statement that uses an aggregating IN subquery.
Added a parameter to the function fix_prepare_information
to restore correctly the having clause for the second execution.
Saved andor structure of the having conditions at the proper moment
before any calls of split_sum_func2 that could modify the having structure
adding new Item_ref objects. (These additions, are produced not with
the statement mem_root, but rather with the execution mem_root.)
The problem was that if after FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK the user
issued DROP/ALTER PROCEDURE/FUNCTION the operation would fail (as
expected), but after UNLOCK TABLE any attempt to execute the same
operation would lead to the error 1305 "PROCEDURE/FUNCTION does not
exist", and an attempt to execute any stored function will also fail.
This happened because under FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK we couldn't open
and lock mysql.proc table for update, and this fact was erroneously
remembered by setting mysql_proc_table_exists to false, so subsequent
statements believed that mysql.proc doesn't exist, and thus that there
are no functions and procedures in the database.
As a solution, we remove mysql_proc_table_exists flag completely. The
reason is that this optimization didn't work most of the time anyway.
Even if open of mysql.proc failed for some reason when we were trying to
call a function or a procedure, we were setting mysql_proc_table_exists
back to true to force table reopen for the sake of producing the same
error message (the open can fail for number of reasons). The solution
could have been to remember the reason why open failed, but that's a lot
of code for optimization of a rare case. Hence we simply remove this
optimization.
if join is used
For procedures with selects that use complicated joins with ON expression
re-execution could erroneously ignore this ON expression, giving
incorrect result.
The problem was that optimized ON expression wasn't saved for
re-execution. The solution is to properly save it.
The following procedure was not possible if max_sp_recursion_depth is 0
create procedure show_proc() show create procedure show_proc;
Actually there is no recursive call but the limit is checked.
Solved by temporarily increasing the thread's limit just before the fetch from cache
and decreasing after that.
User name (host name) has limit on length. The server code relies on these
limits when storing the names. The problem was that sometimes these limits
were not checked properly, so that could lead to buffer overflow.
The fix is to check length of user/host name in parser and if string is too
long, throw an error.
create function func() returns char(10) binary ...
is no more possible. This will be reenabled when
bug 2676 "DECLARE can't have COLLATE clause in stored procedure"
is fixed.
Fix after 2nd review
The following procedure was not possible if max_sp_recursion_depth is 0
create procedure show_proc() show create procedure show_proc;
Actually there is no recursive call but the limit is checked.
Solved by temporarily increasing the thread's limit just before the fetch from cache
and decreasing after that.
Before this fix,
- a runtime error in a statement in a stored procedure with no error handlers
was properly detected (as expected)
- a runtime error in a statement with an error handler inherited from a non
local runtime context (i.e., proc a with a handler, calling proc b) was
properly detected (as expected)
- a runtime error in a statement with a *local* error handler was executed
as follows :
a) the statement would succeed, regardless of the error condition, (bug)
b) the error handler would be called (as expected).
The root cause is that functions like my_messqge_sql would "forget" to set
the thread flag thd->net.report_error to 1, because of the check involving
sp_rcontext::found_handler_here().
Failure to set this flag would cause, later in the call stack,
in Item_func::fix_fields() at line 190, the code to return FALSE and consider
that executing the statement was successful.
With this fix :
- error handling code, that was duplicated in different places in the code,
is now implemented in sp_rcontext::handle_error(),
- handle_error() correctly sets thd->net.report_error when a handler is
present, regardless of the handler location (local, or in the call stack).
A test case, bug8153_subselect, has been written to demonstrate the change
of behavior before and after the fix.
Another test case, bug8153_function_a, as also been writen.
This test has the same behavior before and after the fix.
This test has been written to demonstrate that the previous expected
result of procedure bug18787, was incorrect, since select no_such_function()
should fail and therefore not produce a result.
The incorrect result for bug18787 has the same root cause as Bug#8153,
and the expected result has been adjusted.
Fix for BUG#16676: Database CHARSET not used for stored procedures
The problem in BUG#16211 is that CHARSET-clause of the return type for
stored functions is just ignored.
The problem in BUG#16676 is that if character set is not explicitly
specified for sp-variable, the server character set is used instead
of the database one.
The fix has two parts:
- always store CHARSET-clause of the return type along with the
type definition in mysql.proc.returns column. "Always" means that
CHARSET-clause is appended even if it has not been explicitly
specified in CREATE FUNCTION statement (this affects BUG#16211 only).
Storing CHARSET-clause if it is not specified is essential to avoid
changing character set if the database character set is altered in
the future.
NOTE: this change is not backward compatible with the previous releases.
- use database default character set if CHARSET-clause is not explicitly
specified (this affects both BUG#16211 and BUG#16676).
NOTE: this also breaks backward compatibility.
