for YEAR data type.
The problem was that for some unknown reason 0 was not allowed
as a default value for YEAR data type. That was coded before BK.
However the Manual does not say a word about such a limitation.
Also, it looks inconsistent with other data types.
The fix is to allow 0 as a default value.
Fixed the parser to reject SQLSTATE '00000',
since '00000' is the successful completion condition,
and can not be caught by an exception handler in SQL.
correctly - crashes server !
Creating federated table with connect string containing empty
(zero-length) host name and port is evaluated as 0 (port is
incorrect, omitted or 0) crashes server.
This happens because federated calls strcmp() with NULL pointer.
Fixed by avoiding strcmp() call if hostname is set to NULL.
binlogging of insert into a autoincrement blackhole table ignored
an explicit set insert_id.
Fixed with refining of the blackhole's insert method to call
update_auto_increment() that prepares binlogging the insert query
with the preceeding set insert_id.
Note, as the engine does not store any actual data one has to explicitly
provide to the server with the value of the autoincrement column via
set insert_id. Otherwise binlogging will happend with the default
set insert_id=1.
When swapping out heap I_S tables to disk, this is done after plan refinement.
Thus, READ_RECORD::file will still point to the (deleted) heap handler at start
of execution. This causes segmentation fault if join buffering is used and the
query is a star query where the result is found to be empty before accessing
some table. In this case that table has not been initialized (i.e. had its
READ_RECORD re-initialized) before the cleanup routine tries to close the handler.
Fixed by updating READ_RECORD::file when changing handler.
binlog_format=mixed
Statement-based replication of DELETE ... LIMIT, UPDATE ... LIMIT,
INSERT ... SELECT ... LIMIT is not safe as order of rows is not
defined.
With this fix, we issue a warning that this statement is not safe to
replicate in statement mode, or go to row-based mode in mixed mode.
Note that we may consider a statement as safe if ORDER BY primary_key
is present. However it may confuse users to see very similiar statements
replicated differently.
Note 2: regular UPDATE statement (w/o LIMIT) is unsafe as well, but
this patch doesn't address this issue. See comment from Kristian
posted 18 Mar 10:55.
Bug #18453 Warning/error message if there is a mismatch between ...
There were three problems:
1. the reported lack of warnings for the BEFORE syntax of PURGE;
2. the similar lack of warnings for the TO syntax;
3. incompatible behaviour between the two in that the latter blanked out
regardlessly of presence or lack the actual file corresponding to
an index record; the former version gave up at the first mismatch.
fixed with deploying the warning's generation and synronizing logics of
purge_logs() and purge_logs_before_date().
my_stat() is called in either of two branches of purge_logs() (responsible
for the TO syntax of PURGE) similarly to how it has behaved in the BEFORE syntax.
If there is no actual binlog file, my_stat returns NULL and my_delete is
not invoked.
A critical error is reported to the user if a file from the index
could not be retrieved info about or deleted with a system error code
different than ENOENT.
The problem was in a test case for Bug33507:
- when the number of active connections reaches the limit,
the server accepts only root connections. That's achieved by
accepting a connection, negotiating with the client and
checking user credentials. If it is not SUPER, the connection
is dropped.
- when the server accepts connection, it increases the counter;
- when the server drops connection, it decreases the counter;
- the race was in between of decreasing the counter and accepting
new connection:
- max_user_connections = 2;
- 2 oridinary user connections accepted;
- extra user connection is establishing;
- server checked user credentials, and sent 'Too many connections'
error;
- the client receives the error and establishes extra SUPER user
connection;
- the server however didn't decrease the counter (the extra
user connection still is "alive" in the server) -- so, the new
SUPER-user connection, will be dropped, because it exceeds
(max_user_connections + 1).
The fix is to implement "safe connect", which makes several attempts
to connect and use it in the test script.
Queries like:
SELECT ROW(1, 2) IN (SELECT t1.a, 2)
FROM t1 GROUP BY t1.a
or
SELECT ROW(1, 2) IN (SELECT t1.a, 2 FROM t2)
FROM t1 GROUP BY t1.a
lead to assertion failure in the
Item_in_subselect::row_value_transformer method in debugging
build, or to unexpected error message in release build:
ERROR 1247 (42S22): Reference '<list ref>' not supported (forward
reference in item list)
Unexpected error message and assertion failure have been
eliminated.
