There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1
rb:961
rb:947
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1
rb:961
rb:947
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
rb:947
approved by Jimmy Yang
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
rb:947
approved by Jimmy Yang
mysql-test-run auto-disables all optional plugins.
mysql-test/include/default_client.cnf:
no @OPT.plugindir anymore
mysql-test/include/default_mysqld.cnf:
don't disable plugins manually - mtr can do it better
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_bug47167.test:
mtr now uses suite-dir as an include path
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_file_format.test:
mtr now uses suite-dir as an include path
mysql-test/t/partition_binlog.test:
this test uses partitions
storage/example/mysql-test/mtr/t/source.result:
update results. as mysqltest includes the correct overlayed include
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
the assert is wrong
The actual Bug#11754376 does not exist in MySQL 5.5 because at startup
we drop entries for temporary tables from InnoDB dictionary cache (only
if ROW_FORMAT is not REDUNDANT). But nevertheless the bug in
normalize_table_name_low() is present so we fix it.
The actual Bug#11754376 does not exist in MySQL 5.5 because at startup
we drop entries for temporary tables from InnoDB dictionary cache (only
if ROW_FORMAT is not REDUNDANT). But nevertheless the bug in
normalize_table_name_low() is present so we fix it.
GRACEFUL SHUTDOWN
During startup mysql picks up .frm files from the tmpdir directory and
tries to drop those tables in the storage engine.
The problem is that when tmpdir ends in / then ha_innobase::delete_table()
is passed a string like "/var/tmp//#sql123", then it wrongly normalizes it
to "/#sql123" and calls row_drop_table_for_mysql() which of course fails
to delete the table entry from the InnoDB dictionary cache.
ha_innobase::delete_table() returns an error but nevertheless mysql wipes
away the .frm file and the entry in the InnoDB dictionary cache remains
orphaned with no easy way to remove it.
The "no easy" way to remove it is to create a similar temporary table again,
copy its .frm file to tmpdir under "#sql123.frm" and restart mysqld with
tmpdir=/var/tmp (no trailing slash) - this way mysql will pick the .frm file
after restart and will try to issue drop table for "/var/tmp/#sql123"
(notice do double slash), ha_innobase::delete_table() will normalize it to
"tmp/#sql123" and row_drop_table_for_mysql() will successfully remove the
table entry from the dictionary cache.
The solution is to fix normalize_table_name_low() to normalize things like
"/var/tmp//table" correctly to "tmp/table".
This patch also adds a test function which invokes
normalize_table_name_low() with various inputs to make sure it works
correctly and a mtr test that calls this test function.
Reviewed by: Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/929/)
GRACEFUL SHUTDOWN
During startup mysql picks up .frm files from the tmpdir directory and
tries to drop those tables in the storage engine.
The problem is that when tmpdir ends in / then ha_innobase::delete_table()
is passed a string like "/var/tmp//#sql123", then it wrongly normalizes it
to "/#sql123" and calls row_drop_table_for_mysql() which of course fails
to delete the table entry from the InnoDB dictionary cache.
ha_innobase::delete_table() returns an error but nevertheless mysql wipes
away the .frm file and the entry in the InnoDB dictionary cache remains
orphaned with no easy way to remove it.
The "no easy" way to remove it is to create a similar temporary table again,
copy its .frm file to tmpdir under "#sql123.frm" and restart mysqld with
tmpdir=/var/tmp (no trailing slash) - this way mysql will pick the .frm file
after restart and will try to issue drop table for "/var/tmp/#sql123"
(notice do double slash), ha_innobase::delete_table() will normalize it to
"tmp/#sql123" and row_drop_table_for_mysql() will successfully remove the
table entry from the dictionary cache.
The solution is to fix normalize_table_name_low() to normalize things like
"/var/tmp//table" correctly to "tmp/table".
This patch also adds a test function which invokes
normalize_table_name_low() with various inputs to make sure it works
correctly and a mtr test that calls this test function.
Reviewed by: Marko (http://bur03.no.oracle.com/rb/r/929/)
disable test cases for bugs not fixed in xtradb.
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb-lock.test:
instead of disabling the test in disabled.def
(hoping that somebody someday will enable it),
skip it only for xtradb (not for innodb), and
only for the current xtradb version. the test
will enable itself automatically on the next
xtradb merge
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_cmp_drop_table.test:
instead of disabling the test in disabled.def
(hoping that somebody someday will enable it),
skip it only for xtradb (not for innodb), and
only for the current xtradb version. the test
will enable itself automatically on the next
xtradb merge
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_corrupt_bit.test:
fix the error number
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
fix the error number
storage/xtradb/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
fix the error number
ISSUES WITH COPYING PARTITIONED INNODB TABLES FROM LINUX TO WINDOWS
This problem was already fixed in mysql-trunk as part of bug #11755924. I am
backporting the fix to mysql-5.1.
ISSUES WITH COPYING PARTITIONED INNODB TABLES FROM LINUX TO WINDOWS
This problem was already fixed in mysql-trunk as part of bug #11755924. I am
backporting the fix to mysql-5.1.
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
If we meet DB_TOO_MANY_CONCURRENT_TRXS during the execution tab_create_graph from row_create_table_for_mysql(), .ibd file for the table should be created already but was not deleted for the error handling.
rb:875 approved by Jimmy Yang
The counter handler_read_key (SSV::ha_read_key_count) is incremented
incorrectly.
The mysql server maintains a per thread system_status_var (SSV)
object. This object contains among other things the counter
SSV::ha_read_key_count. The purpose of this counter is to measure the
number of requests to read a row based on a key (or the number of
index lookups).
This counter was wrongly incremented in the
ha_innobase::innobase_get_index(). The fix removes
this increment statement (for both innodb and innodb_plugin).
The various callers of the innobase_get_index() was checked to
determine if anybody must increment this counter (if they first call
innobase_get_index() and then perform an index lookup). It was found
that no caller of innobase_get_index() needs to worry about the
SSV::ha_read_key_count counter.
The counter handler_read_key (SSV::ha_read_key_count) is incremented
incorrectly.
The mysql server maintains a per thread system_status_var (SSV)
object. This object contains among other things the counter
SSV::ha_read_key_count. The purpose of this counter is to measure the
number of requests to read a row based on a key (or the number of
index lookups).
This counter was wrongly incremented in the
ha_innobase::innobase_get_index(). The fix removes
this increment statement (for both innodb and innodb_plugin).
The various callers of the innobase_get_index() was checked to
determine if anybody must increment this counter (if they first call
innobase_get_index() and then perform an index lookup). It was found
that no caller of innobase_get_index() needs to worry about the
SSV::ha_read_key_count counter.
I manually checked that all the conflicting InnoDB changes are in 5.5 already.
Two things I am not sure about - I commented them with XXX in this patch.
I will further check with the authors of the changesets whether these things
should be present or not.
I manually checked that all the conflicting InnoDB changes are in 5.5 already.
Two things I am not sure about - I commented them with XXX in this patch.
I will further check with the authors of the changesets whether these things
should be present or not.
