Select of the test could not perform deterministically, because the table remains to be
updatable by the running event handler.
Fixed with changing verification to use a logical values instead of comparison
with a pre-recorded results.
Bug#36033 - Test funcs_1.processlist_val_ps fails on Windows
Bug#36034 - Test parts.part_supported_sql_func_<eng> fails on Windows
Bug#36036 - Test parts.partition_alter1_<eng> fails on Windows
Bug#36037 - Test parts.partition_alter2_<eng> fails on Windows
Bug#36038 - Test parts.partition_basic_<engine> failing on Windows
Bug#36039 - Test parts.partition_engine_<eng> fails on Windows
Bug#36040 - Test parts.partition_syntax_<eng> fails on Windows
Changeset to fix multiple 5.1.24-rc build bugs on Windows platforms.
Many of these bugs had the same root causes.
Among two claimed artifacts the critical one is in that the Table map of
a query following the failing with a duplicate key error CREATE-SELECT is skipped from
instantionating (and thus binlogging). That leads to sending a "chopped" group of the data
row-events without the table map head to the slave.
The slave can not apply the only data row events.
It's not easy to force the slave to react with an error in such a case (the second complaint
on the bug report), because the lack of a table Rows_log_event::do_apply_event the data row event
handler is a common situation which normally designates the event has to be filtered out
basing on the repliation do/ingore rules decision.
Fixed: table map creating and binlogging is restored via deploying the standard cleanup call in
select_create::abort().
No error is reported if by chance the table map was not been binlogged.
Leaving this out to resolve with considering how to combine the do/ingore rules with the situation
when erronoulsy the Table_map is not written to binlog.
Problems were caused by modifications of
- the server
- HANDLER FOR SQLSTATE '00000' is now rejected (bug fix)
affects several ..._storedproc* tests
- improved error message
affects the ..._trig_03e
- improved content of information_schema.COLUMNS about
information_schema.REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS
affects is_columns_is
- the content of the community build (collations)
affects charset_collation_3
ChangeSet@1.2583, 2008-03-31
Merge five.local.lan:/work/merge/mysql-5.0-Bug
into five.local.lan:/work/merge/mysql-5.1-Bug
Addditional manual fixes will be needed.
MERGE: 1.1810.3667.16
Which contains
ChangeSet@1.1810.3667.16, 2008-03-31
Fix for Bug
#35335 funcs_1: Some tests fail within load_file during
pushbuild runs
...
Bug#35335 funcs_1: Some tests fail within load_file during
pushbuild runs
Solution: 1. Move files with input data used in load_file,
load data etc.
from suite/funcs_1/<whatever>
to std_data
2. Use for testsuite funcs_1 the server option
--secure-file-priv=<MYSQLTEST_VARDIR>
3. Outfiles have to be stored under MYSQLTEST_VARDIR
+ changes according to WL#4304 Cleanup in funcs_1 tests
- backport of fixes/improvements made in 5.1 to 5.0
The differences between scripts in 5.0 and 5.1 cause
much additional and annoying work during any upmerge.
- replace error numbers with names
- improved comments
- improved formatting
- Unify storage engine names so that result files for
storage engine variants do not differ (some tests)
- remove a script no more used (tests are done in other scripts)
Disabled 'rpl_redirect', failure is sporadic and and the test is superfluous
rpl_packet.test, rpl_packet.result:
Removing race conditions from rpl_packet causing test to fail
If a binlog file is manually replaced with a namesake directory the internal purging did
not handle the error of deleting the file so that eventually
a post-execution guards fires an assert.
Fixed with reusing a snippet of code for bug@18199 to tolerate lack of the file but no other error
at an attempt to delete it.
The same applied to the index file deletion.
The cset carries pieces of manual merging.
improving a test that shows a failure.
the wait condition was for data in tables but the
log positions are updates after the data are unlocked.
So there was a time window
[after_table_unlock_for_select, log_pos_updated] where the
orig cond was true but log position might be changed.
the correct one is to expect the last pos of the
slave's insert in the output of show_slave_status on the
master.
The bug allow multiple executing transactions working with non-transactional
to interfere with each others by interleaving the events of different trans-
actions.
Bug is fixed by writing non-transactional events to the transaction cache and
flushing the cache to the binary log at statement commit. To mimic the behavior
of normal statement-based replication, we flush the transaction cache in row-
based mode when there is no committed statements in the transaction cache,
which means we are committing the first one. This means that it will be written
to the binary log as a "mini-transaction" with just the rows for the statement.
Note that the changes here does not take effect when building the server with
HAVE_TRANSACTIONS set to false, but it is not clear if this was possible before
this patch either.
For row-based logging, we also have that when AUTOCOMMIT=1, the code now always
generates a BEGIN/COMMIT pair for single statements, or BEGIN/ROLLBACK pair in the
case of non-transactional changes in a statement that was rolled back. Note that
for the case where changes to a non-transactional table causes a rollback due
to error, the statement will now be logged with a BEGIN/ROLLBACK pair, even
though some changes has been committed to the non-transactional table.
binlog_format=mixed
Statement-based replication of DELETE ... LIMIT, UPDATE ... LIMIT,
INSERT ... SELECT ... LIMIT is not safe as order of rows is not
defined.
With this fix, we issue a warning that this statement is not safe to
replicate in statement mode, or go to row-based mode in mixed mode.
Note that we may consider a statement as safe if ORDER BY primary_key
is present. However it may confuse users to see very similiar statements
replicated differently.
Note 2: regular UPDATE statement (w/o LIMIT) is unsafe as well, but
this patch doesn't address this issue. See comment from Kristian
posted 18 Mar 10:55.
