Commit graph

3002 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sergey Petrunya
3098c21b8f Merge MWL#90 into 5.3-main 2011-04-30 04:59:05 +04:00
Igor Babaev
24edac2211 Merge 2011-04-26 21:11:06 -07:00
Igor Babaev
8d9dd21d85 Fixed LP bugs , .
Both these two bugs happened due to the following problem.
When a view column is referenced in the query an Item_direct_view_ref
object is created that is refers to the Item_field for the column.
All references to the same view column refer to the same Item_field.
Different references can belong to different AND/OR levels and,
as a result, can be included in different Item_equal object.
These Item_equal objects may include different constant objects.
If these constant objects are substituted for the Item_field created
for a view column we have a conflict situation when the second
substitution annuls the first substitution. This leads to
wrong result sets returned by the query. Bug  demonstrates
such an erroneous behaviour.
Test case of the bug  produces wrong result sets because best
equal fields of the multiple equalities built for different OR levels
of the WHERE condition differs. The subsitution for the best equal field
in the second OR branch overwrites the the substitution made for the
first branch.

To avoid such conflicts we have to substitute for the references
to the view columns rather than for the underlying field items.
To make such substitutions possible we have to include into
multiple equalities references to view columns rather than 
field items created for such columns.

This patch modifies the Item_equal class to include references
to view columns into multiple equality objects. It also performs
a clean up of the class methods and adds more comments. The methods
of the Item_direct_view_ref class that assist substitutions for
references to view columns has been also added by this patch.
2011-04-26 19:58:41 -07:00
unknown
43acceeb47 Fix LP BUG#715069
Analysis:
The wrong result is a consquence of sorting the subquery
result and then selecting only the first row due to the
artificial LIMIT 1 introduced by the fix_fields phase.
Normally, if there is an ORDER BY in a subquery, the ORDER
is removed (Item_in_subselect::select_in_like_transformer),
however if a GROUP BY is transformed into ORDER, this happens
later, after the removal of the ORDER clause of subqueries, so
we end up with a subquery with an ORDER clause, and an artificially
added LIMIT 1.

The reason why the same works in the main 5.3 without MWL#89, is
that the 5.3 performs all subquery transformations, including
IN->EXISTS before JOIN::optimize(). The beginning of JOIN::optimize
does:
  if (having || (select_options & OPTION_FOUND_ROWS))
    select_limit= HA_POS_ERROR;
which sets the limit back to infinity, thus 5.3 sorts the whole
subquery result, and IN performs the lookup into all subquery result
rows.

Solution:
Sorting of subqueries without LIMIT is meaningless. Since LIMIT in
subqueries is not supported, the patch removes sorting by setting
  join->skip_sort_order= true
for each subquery JOIN object. This improves a number of execution
plans to not perform unnecessary sorting at all.
2011-04-20 18:36:55 +03:00
unknown
ce55d37929 Merge Mariadb 5.1->5.2 2011-04-12 14:26:06 +02:00
Sergey Glukhov
a5e8d9029b Bug#11756928 48916: SERVER INCORRECTLY PROCESSING HAVING CLAUSES WITH AN ORDER BY CLAUSE
Before sorting HAVING condition is split into two parts,
first part is a table related condition and the rest of is
HAVING part. Extraction of HAVING part does not take into account
the fact that some of conditions might be non-const but
have 'used_tables' == 0 (independent subqueries)
and because of that these conditions are cut off by
make_cond_for_table() function.
The fix is to use (table_map) 0 instead of used_tables in
third argument for make_cond_for_table() function.
It allows to extract elements which belong to sorted
table and in addition elements which are independend
subqueries.


mysql-test/r/having.result:
  test case
mysql-test/t/having.test:
  test case
sql/sql_select.cc:
  The fix is to use (table_map) 0 instead of used_tables in
  third argument for make_cond_for_table() function.
  It allows to extract elements which belong to sorted
  table and in addition elements which are independend
  subqueries.
2011-04-22 11:20:55 +04:00
Tor Didriksen
dd3d9477b2 Bug#11765713 58705: OPTIMIZER LET ENGINE DEPEND ON UNINITIALIZED VALUES CREATED BY OPT_SUM_QU
Valgrind warnings were caused by comparing index values to an un-initialized field.


mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
  New test cases.
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
  New test cases.
sql/opt_sum.cc:
  Add thd to opt_sum_query enabling it to test for errors.
  If we have a non-nullable index, we cannot use it to match null values,
  since set_null() will be ignored, and we might compare uninitialized data.
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Add thd to opt_sum_query, enabling it to test for errors.
sql/sql_select.h:
  Add thd to opt_sum_query, enabling it to test for errors.
2011-04-14 16:35:24 +02:00
Sergey Glukhov
3abe56f31d Bug#11756242 48137: PROCEDURE ANALYSE() LEAKS MEMORY WHEN RETURNING NULL
There are two problems with ANALYSE():

1. Memory leak 
   it happens because do_select() can overwrite
   JOIN::procedure field(with zero value in our case) and
   JOIN destructor don't free the memory allocated for
   JOIN::procedure. The fix is to save original JOIN::procedure
   before do_select() call and restore it after do_select
   execution.

2. Wrong result
   If ANALYSE() procedure is used for the statement with LIMIT clause
   it could retrun empty result set. It happens because of missing 
   analyse::end_of_records() call. First end_send() function call
   returns NESTED_LOOP_QUERY_LIMIT and second call of end_send() with
   end_of_records flag enabled does not happen. The fix is to return
   NESTED_LOOP_OK from end_send() if procedure is active.


mysql-test/r/analyse.result:
  test case
mysql-test/t/analyse.test:
  test case
sql/sql_select.cc:
  --save original JOIN::procedure before do_select() call and
    restore it after do_select execution.
  --return NESTED_LOOP_OK from end_send() if procedure is active
2011-04-14 12:11:57 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
2a498b393a Merge: Make EXPLAIN better at displaying MRR/BKA 2011-04-04 12:38:08 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
8fb724281e Merge MWL#90 with main 5.3 tree 2011-04-02 14:09:00 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
997445bc8e Make EXPLAIN better at displaying MRR/BKA:
- "Using MRR" is no longer shown with range access.
- Instead, both range and BKA accesses will show one of the following:
  = "Rowid-ordered scan"
  = "Key-ordered scan"
  = "Key-ordered Rowid-ordered scan"
depending on whether DS-MRR implementation will do scan keys in order, rowids in order,
or both.
- The patch also introduces a way for other storage engines/MRR implementations to
  pass information to EXPLAIN output about the properties of employed MRR scans.
2011-04-02 14:04:45 +04:00
unknown
619a16bffc MWL#89
- Auto-merge with 5.3 main.
- Changed the test for LP BUG#719198 so that
  an two more queries were added, and removed a
  query that produces a wrong result due to an
  unrelated problem. The wrong result is submitted
  as a separate bug.
2011-04-01 15:42:59 +03:00
Michael Widenius
1ee94dc2f7 Fixed all BUILD scripts to use g++ instead of gcc for linking
Fixed memory leak from HEAP tables that was not deleted properly


BUILD/compile-alpha-ccc:
  Use g++ instead of gcc for linking
BUILD/compile-alpha-debug:
  Use g++ instead of gcc for linking
BUILD/compile-pentium-pgcc:
  Use g++ instead of gcc for linking
BUILD/compile-solaris-sparc:
  Use g++ instead of gcc for linking
BUILD/compile-solaris-sparc-debug:
  Use g++ instead of gcc for linking
BUILD/compile-solaris-sparc-purify:
  Use g++ instead of gcc for linking
sql/item.cc:
  Safety fixes for expr_cache
  Call Item_result:field::cleanup() in Item_cache_wrapper::cleanup()
  More DBUG_PRINT
sql/sql_base.cc:
  Simple optimization for setup_wild
  More DBUG_PRINT
sql/sql_expression_cache.cc:
  Added header
  Removed not needed initialization
sql/sql_lex.cc:
  More DBUG_PRINT
sql/sql_select.cc:
  More DBUG_PRINT
  Fixed memory leak from HEAP tables that was not deleted properly
storage/heap/hp_create.c:
  More DBUG_PRINT
2011-03-31 16:26:51 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
b86abed53d MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-30 14:38:38 +04:00
unknown
3d8aa98c71 MWL#89
Merge 5.3 with 5.3-mwl89.
2011-03-30 11:38:57 +03:00
unknown
952556b345 MWL#89
Merge 5.3 with 5.3-mwl89.
2011-03-30 10:10:59 +03:00
unknown
6902770869 Merge the fix for LP BUG#613029. 2011-03-30 00:48:35 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
c5c48f1cbd MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-29 12:04:16 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
74bb936db1 optimize_wo_join_buffering(): Put saving/restoring of cur_sj_inner_tables back,
together with explanation why we need it.
2011-03-29 10:08:23 +04:00
unknown
7999f40a99 Fix LP BUG#613029
Analysis:
There are two code paths through which JOIN::exec may produce
an all-NULL row for an empty result set. One goes via the
function return_zero_rows(), when query processing detectes
early that the where clause is false, the other one is via
do_select() in the case of join execution.

In the case of do_select(), the problem was that the executioner
didn't set TABLE::null_row to 1. As result when sending the only
result row, the evaluation of each field didn't detect that all
non-aggregated fields are NULL, because Field::is_null returned
true, after checking that field->table->null_row was false.

Given that the each non-aggregated field was not considered NULL,
select_result::send_data sent whatever was in the buffer of each
field. However, since there was no actual data in the field buffer,
send_data() accessed and sent whatever junk was in the field's
data buffer.

Solution:
Similar to the analogous case in return_zero_rows() mark all
tables that their current row is NULL before sending the
artificailly created NULL row.
2011-03-28 12:55:36 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
c763fb1b15 MWL#90: Address review feedback in get_best_combination(). 2011-03-27 04:49:31 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
73510c289a MWL#90: Switch update_depend_map() back to single loop (so that diff is smaller) 2011-03-27 04:02:27 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
924bdf3e1c Remove comments 2011-03-27 03:55:38 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
4e5199912b Rename JOIN::top_jtrange_tables to top_join_tab_count 2011-03-27 03:54:15 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
5de770f317 MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-27 03:45:16 +04:00
Sergey Petrunya
290a72d50b Check the theory that optimize_wo_join_buffering() doesn't need to save/restore join->cur_sj_inner_tables. 2011-03-26 17:39:34 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
2071ac10fd MWL#90: Address review feedback part
- Address review feedback in select_describe().
2011-03-26 12:46:00 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
bf894470de MWL#90: Address review feedback part . 2011-03-25 18:42:47 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
5ae088f8c1 Fix a problem introduced in previous cset 2011-03-25 17:10:16 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
5a07fcc6c4 MWL#90: Address review feedback part . 2011-03-25 14:24:58 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
253087815a Make first_linear_tab()/next_linear_tab() use named constants instead of TRUE/FALSE flags, for better readability. 2011-03-25 12:58:27 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
201fb06db9 Merge in fix for BUG#727667 2011-03-25 12:47:44 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
0fe8c972c6 BUG#727667 Wrong result with OR + NOT NULL in maria-5.3
- Address review feedback: introduce NO_REF_PART symbolic name, better comments
2011-03-25 12:43:32 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
daf4acc18a MWL#90: Address review feedback: fix a problem introduced a few csets earlier: Do perform tab->cleanup()
for const tables in JOIN::cleanup().
2011-03-24 22:46:10 +03:00
unknown
ec23949158 Fix LP BUG#715738
Analysis:
A query with implicit grouping is one with aggregate functions and
no GROUP BY clause. MariaDB inherits from MySQL an SQL extenstion
that allows mixing aggregate functions with non-aggregate fields.
If a query with such mixed select clause produces an empty result
set, the meaning of aggregate functions is well defined - either
NULL (MIN, MAX, etc.), or 0 (count(*)). However the non-aggregated
fields must also have some value, and the only reasonable value in
the case of empty result is NULL.

The cause of the many wrong results was that if a field is declared
as non-nullable (e.g. because it is a PK or NOT NULL), the semantic
analysis and the optimization phases treat this field as non-nullable,
and generate all related query plan elements based on this assumption.

Later during execution, these incorrectly configured/generated query
plan elements result in a wrong result because the selected fields
are not null due to the not-null assumption during optimization.

Solution:
Detect before the context analysys phase that a query uses implicit
grouping with mixed aggregates/non-aggregates, and set all fields
as nullable. The parser already walks the SELECT clause, and
already sets Item::with_sum_func for Items that reference aggreagate
functions. The patch adds a symmetric Item::with_field so that all
Items that reference an Item_field are marked during their
construction at parse time in the same way as with aggregate function
use.
2011-03-24 16:34:06 +02:00
Sergey Petrunya
f064087ed0 MWL#90: Address review feedback part :
- among everything else, switch to using first/next_linear_tab() in make_outerjoin_info().
2011-03-22 19:42:36 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
739e6c99a2 MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-22 19:23:12 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
39fe368d68 MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-22 16:46:39 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
b9d4c69135 MWL#90: Address review feedback part : more clearer code in next_linear_tab() function 2011-03-22 13:17:14 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
b77e3dc9f4 MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-22 13:09:55 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
809a805251 MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-22 00:39:27 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
4e5dbab5a6 MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-21 23:25:09 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
d56e74eb9b MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-21 23:06:16 +03:00
Sergey Petrunya
792c67ff61 MWL#90: Address review feedback part 2011-03-19 12:27:08 +03:00
Igor Babaev
8aaf9197d0 Merge. 2011-03-15 12:30:48 -07:00
Igor Babaev
edc69e3227 Merge 2011-03-13 03:50:14 -07:00
Michael Widenius
e6b0be38f9 Bug fix for lp:732124 union + limit returns wrong result
mysql-test/r/union.result:
  Added test for lp:732124
mysql-test/t/union.test:
  Added test for lp:732124
sql/sp_rcontext.cc:
  Updated function definition for ::send_data()
sql/sp_rcontext.h:
  Updated function definition for ::send_data()
sql/sql_analyse.cc:
  Test if send_data() returned an error
sql/sql_class.cc:
  Updated function definition for ::send_data()
sql/sql_class.h:
  Changed select_result::send_data(List<Item> &items) to return -1 in case of duplicate row that should not be counted as part of LIMIT
sql/sql_cursor.cc:
  Check if send_data returned error
sql/sql_delete.cc:
  Updated function definition for ::send_data()
sql/sql_insert.cc:
  Updated function definition for ::send_data()
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Don't count rows which send_data() tells you to ignore
sql/sql_union.cc:
  Inform caller that the row should be ignored. This is the real bug fix for lp:732124
sql/sql_update.cc:
  Updated function definition for ::send_data()
2011-03-09 19:45:48 +02:00
Michael Widenius
2f9579151b Added item.real_type() for easy access to the underlaying types for Item_ref and Item_cache_wrapper()
This allows us to simplify and speed up some tests and also remove get_cached_item()

sql/item.h:
  Added item.real_type()
  Removed get_cached_item()
sql/opt_range.cc:
  Simplify test
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Simplify test
sql/sql_show.cc:
  Simplify test
2011-03-09 17:55:00 +02:00
Michael Widenius
139a2b64bf Merge with 5.2 2011-03-09 15:47:59 +02:00
Igor Babaev
3d3d5f1d43 Fixed LP bug .
If join condition is of the form <t2.key>=<t1.no_key> then the server
performs no index look-ups when looking for matching rows of t2 for
the rows from t1 with t1.no_key=NULL. It happens because the function
add_not_null_conds() injects an additional condition of the form 
IS NOT NULL(<t1.no_key>) into the WHERE condition.
However if the join condition was of the form <t.key>=<outer_ref> no
additional null rejecting predicate was generated. This could lead
to extra records in the result set if the value of <outer_ref> happened
to be NULL.
The new code injects null rejecting predicates of the form 
IS NOT NULL(<outer_ref>) and evaluates them before the first row
the subquery is constructed.
2011-03-07 22:09:21 -08:00