The logic and the implementation scheme are similar with the
MDEV-9197 Pushdown conditions into non-mergeable views/derived tables
How the push down is made on the example:
select * from t1
where a>3 and b>10 and
(a,b) in (select x,max(y) from t2 group by x);
-->
select * from t1
where a>3 and b>10 and
(a,b) in (select x,max(y)
from t2
where x>3
group by x
having max(y)>10);
The implementation scheme:
1. Search for the condition cond that depends only on the fields
from the left part of the IN subquery (left_part)
2. Find fields F_group in the select of the right part of the
IN subquery (right_part) that are used in the GROUP BY
3. Extract from the cond condition cond_where that depends only on the
fields from the left_part that stay at the same places in the left_part
(have the same indexes) as the F_group fields in the projection of the
right_part
4. Transform cond_where so it can be pushed into the WHERE clause of the
right_part and delete cond_where from the cond
5. Transform cond so it can be pushed into the HAVING clause of the right_part
The optimization is made in the
Item_in_subselect::pushdown_cond_for_in_subquery() and is controlled by the
variable condition_pushdown_for_subquery.
New test file in_subq_cond_pushdown.test is created.
There are also some changes made for setup_jtbm_semi_joins().
Now it is decomposed into the 2 procedures: setup_degenerate_jtbm_semi_joins()
that is called before optimize_cond() for cond and setup_jtbm_semi_joins()
that is called after optimize_cond().
New setup_jtbm_semi_joins() is made in the way so that the result of its work is
the same as if it was called before optimize_cond().
The code that is common for pushdown into materialized derived and into materialized
IN subqueries is factored out into pushdown_cond_for_derived(),
Item_in_subselect::pushdown_cond_for_in_subquery() and
st_select_lex::pushdown_cond_into_where_clause().
TODO:
- Make get_thd_memroot() inline
- To do this, we need to reduce dependence of include files, especially
so that sql_class.h is not depending in item.h
Make differentiation between pullout for merge and pulout of outer field during exists2in transformation.
In last case the field was outer and so we can safely start from name resolution context of the SELECT where it was pulled.
Old behavior lead to inconsistence between list of tables and outer name resolution context (which skips one SELECT for merge purposes) which creates problem vor name resolution.
As a result of this merge the code for the following tasks appears in 10.3:
- MDEV-12172 Implement tables specified by table value constructors
- MDEV-12176 Transform [NOT] IN predicate with long list of values INTO
[NOT] IN subquery.
Significantly reduce the amount of InnoDB, XtraDB and Mariabackup
code changes by defining pfs_os_file_t as something that is
transparently compatible with os_file_t.
The code that blocked conversion of a IN subselect pedicate to a semi-join
if it occurred in the ON expression of an outer join did not do it correctly.
As a result, the conversion was blocked for IN subselect predicates
encountered in ON expressions of INNER joins or in WHERE conditions
of mergeable views / derived tables. This patch fixes this problem.
The implementation of the walk method for the class Item_in_subselect
was missing. As a result the method never traversed the left operand
of any IN subquery predicate.
Item_exists_subselect::exists2in_processor() that performs the
Exist-To-In transformation calls the walk method to collect info
on outer references. As the walk method did not traverse the
left operands of the IN subqueries the outer references there
were not taken into account and some subqueries that were actually
correlated were marked as uncorrelated. It could lead to an
attempt of the materialization of such a subquery.
Also added a cleanup for some test cases merged from 5.5.
This patch fixed some problems that occurred with subqueries that
contained directly or indirectly recursive references to recursive CTEs.
1. A [NOT] IN predicate with a constant left operand and a non-correlated
subquery as the right operand used in the specification of a recursive CTE
was considered as a constant predicate and was evaluated only once.
Now such a predicate is re-evaluated after every iteration of the process
that produces the records of the recursive CTE.
2. The Exists-To-IN transformation could be applied to [NOT] IN predicates
with recursive references. This opened a possibility of materialization
for the subqueries used as right operands. Yet, materialization
is prohibited for the subqueries if they contain a recursive reference.
Now the Exists-To-IN transformation cannot be applied for subquery
predicates with recursive references.
The function st_select_lex::check_subqueries_with_recursive_references()
is called now only for the first execution of the SELECT.
Also, implement MDEV-11027 a little differently from 5.5 and 10.0:
recv_apply_hashed_log_recs(): Change the return type back to void
(DB_SUCCESS was always returned).
Report progress also via systemd using sd_notifyf().
Also, implement MDEV-11027 a little differently from 5.5:
recv_sys_t::report(ib_time_t): Determine whether progress should
be reported.
recv_apply_hashed_log_recs(): Rename the parameter to last_batch.
This patch:
- Adds a new virtual method Type_handler::Item_get_cache
- Splits moves Item_cache::get_cache() into the new method, every
"case XXX_RESULT" to the corresponding Type_handler_xxx::Item_get_cache.
- Adds Item::get_cache as a convenience wrapper, to make the caller code
shorter.
- Changes the last argument of Arg_comparator::cache_converted_constant()
from Item_result to "const Type_handler *".
- Removes subselect_engine::cmp_type, subselect_engine::res_type,
subselect_engine::res_field_type and derives subselect_engine
from Type_handler_hybrid_field_type instead.
- Makes Type_handler_varchar public, as it's now needed as the
default data type handler for subselect_engine.
