EXPLAIN EXTENDED for an UPDATE/DELETE/INSERT/REPLACE statement did not
produce the warning containing the text representation of the query
obtained after the optimization phase. Such warning was produced for
SELECT statements, but not for DML statements.
The patch fixes this defect of EXPLAIN EXTENDED for DML statements.
Remove table_count from Query_tables_list (not used, moved to MYSQL_LOCK).
Rename table_count from LEX to avoid mixing it with other counters of tables.
Cause: a copy of the joined TABLE_LIST is created during multi_update::prepare
and TABLE::pos_in_table_list of the tables are set to point to the new
TABLE_LIST object. This prevents some optimization steps to perform correctly.
Solution: do not update pos_in_table_list during multi_update::prepare
not every index-using plan sets bits in table->quick_keys.
QUICK_ROR_INTERSECT_SELECT, for example, doesn't.
Use the fact that select->quick is set instead.
Also allow EXPLAIN to work.
- Handle stored function conditions correctly, with the same logic as with UDFs.
- When running queries on Spider SE, by default, we do not push down WHERE conditions containing usage of UDFs/stored functions to remote data nodes, unless the user demands (by setting spider_use_pushdown_udf).
- Disable direct update/delete when a udf condition is skipped.
The columns that are part of DEFAULT expression were not read-marked
in statements like UPDATE...SET b=DEFAULT.
The problem is `F(DEFAULT)` expression depends of the left-hand side of an
assignment. However, setup_fields accepts only right-hand side value.
Neither Item::fix_fields does.
Suchwise, b=DEFAULT(b) works fine, because Item_default_field has
information on what field it is default of:
if (thd->mark_used_columns != MARK_COLUMNS_NONE)
def_field->default_value->expr->update_used_tables();
in Item_default_value::fix_fields().
It is not reasonable to pass a left-hand side to Item:fix_fields, because
the case is rare, so the rewrite
b= F(DEFAULT) -> b= F(DEFAULT(b))
is made instead.
Both UPDATE and multi-UPDATE are affected, however any form of INSERT
is not: it marks all the fields in DEFAULT expressions for read in
TABLE::mark_default_fields_for_write().
Reformulate mark_columns_used_by_index* function family in a more laconic
way:
mark_columns_used_by_index -> mark_index_columns
mark_columns_used_by_index_for_read_no_reset -> mark_index_columns_for_read
mark_columns_used_by_index_no_reset -> mark_index_columns_no_reset
static mark_index_columns -> do_mark_index_columns
Both EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN EXTENDED statements produce different results set
in case it is run in normal way and in PS mode for the statements
UPDATE/DELETE with subquery.
The use case below reproduces the issue:
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT KEY) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,128 sec)
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t2 (c2 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,023 sec)
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t3 (c3 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,021 sec)
MariaDB [test]> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
-> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
-> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
-> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | t3 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 100.00 | |
| 2 | SUBQUERY | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,002 sec)
MariaDB [test]> PREPARE stmt FROM
-> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
-> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
-> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
-> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,000 sec)
Statement prepared
MariaDB [test]> EXECUTE stmt;
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | t3 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 100.00 | |
| 2 | SUBQUERY | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no matching row in const table |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,000 sec)
The reason by that different result sets are produced is that on execution
of the statement 'EXECUTE stmt' the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE not set
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for instances of SELECT_LEX that
correspond to subqueries used in the UPDTAE/DELETE statements.
Initially, these flags were set on parsing the statement
PREPARE stmt FROM "EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET ..."
but latter they were reset before starting real execution of
the parsed query during handling the statement 'EXECUTE stmt';
So, to fix the issue the functions mysql_update()/mysql_delete()
have been modified to set the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE forcibly
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for the primary SELECT_LEX
of the UPDATE/DELETE statement.
This commits replaces the call of the function setup_tables() with
a call of the function setup_tables_and_check_access() in the method
Multiupdate_prelocking_strategy::handle_end().
There is no known bug that would require this change. However the change
aligns this piece of code with the code existed before the patch for
MDEV-24823.
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
If a multi-update query was killed because of timeout or a kill statement,
there was a chance the query returned the error "An error occurred in
multi-table update" instead of the right error, like
"Query execution was interrupted".
Cause: no table->update_handler cloned at the moment of
vers_insert_history_row(). update_handler is needed because there
can't be several inited indexes at once in the same handler. First
index is inited by QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::reset(). Then when history row
is inserted check_duplicate_long_entry_key() is done and it requires
another index.
through 2nd execution of SP
This bug caused a server crash on the second call of any stored procedure
that contained an UPDATE statement over a multi-table view reporting an
error message at the prepare stage.
On the first call of the stored procedure after reporting an error at
the preparation stage of the UPDATE statement finished without calling
the function SELECT_LEX::save_prep_leaf_tables() for the SELECT used as
the definition of the view. This left the SELECT_LEX structure used by
the UPDATE statement in an inconsistent state for second call of the stored
procedure.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
