* Fix the crash: IN-to-EXISTS rewrite causes an error (and so
JOIN::optimize() fails with an error, too), don't call
update_used_tables(). Terminate the query execution instead.
* Fix the cause of the error in the IN-to-EXISTS rewrite: don't do
the rewrite if doing it will cause an error of this kind:
This version of MariaDB doesn't yet support 'SUBQUERY in ROW in left
expression of IN/ALL/ANY'
* Fix another issue exposed by this testcase:
JOIN::setup_subquery_caches() may be invoked before any select has
saved its query plan, and will crash because none of the SELECTs
has called create_explain_query_if_not_exists() to create the Explain
Data Structure for this SELECT.
TODO: When merging this to 10.2, remove the poorly-placed call to
create_explain_query_if_not_exists made by fix for M_D_E_V-16153
- Some of the bug fixes are backports from 10.5!
- The fix in innobase/fil/fil0fil.cc is just a backport to get less
error messages in mysqld.1.err when running with valgrind.
- Renamed HAVE_valgrind_or_MSAN to HAVE_valgrind
The issue here was that the left expr and right expr of the ANY subquery
had different character sets, so we were converting the left expr to utf8 character set.
So when this conversion was happening we were actually converting the item inside the cache,
it looked like <cache>(convert(t1.l1 using utf8)), which is incorrect.
To fix this problem we are going to store the reference of the left expr and convert that
to utf8 character set, it would look like convert(<cache>(`test`.`t1`.`l1`) using utf8)
CREATE PROCEDURE did not detect unknown SP variables in assignments like this:
SET var=a_long_var_name_with_a_typo;
The error happened only during the SP execution time, and only of the control
flow reaches the erroneous statement.
Fixing most expressions to detect unknown identifiers.
This includes simple subqueries without tables:
- Query specification: SELECT list, WHERE,
HAVING (inside aggregate functions) clauses, e.g.
SET var= (SELECT unknown_ident+1);
SET var= (SELECT 1 WHERE unknown_identifier);
SET var= (SELECT 1 HAVING SUM(unknown_identifier);
- Table value constructor: VALUES clause, e.g.:
SET var= (VALUES(unknown_ident));
Note, in some more complex subquery cases unknown variables are still not detected
(this will be fixed separately):
- Derived tables:
SET a=(SELECT unknown_ident FROM (SELECT 1 AS alias) t1);
SET res=(SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT unknown_ident) t2 USING (c1));
- CTE:
SET a=(WITH cte1 (a) AS (SELECT unknown_ident) SELECT * FROM cte1);
SET a=(WITH cte1 (a,b) AS (VALUES (unknown,2),(3,4)) SELECT * FROM cte1);
SET a=(WITH cte1 (a,b) AS (VALUES (1,2),(3,4)) SELECT unknown_ident FROM cte1);
- SELECT .. GROUP BY unknown_identifier
- SELECT .. ORDER BY unknown_identifier
- HAVING with an unknown identifier outside of any aggregate functions:
SELECT .. HAVING unknown_identifier;
When my_vsnprintf() is patched, the code protected disabled with
'WAITING_FOR_BUGFIX_TO_VSPRINTF' should be enabled again. Also all %b
formats in this patch should be revert to %s again
For the case when the optimizer does the IN-EXISTS transformation,
the equality condition is injected in the WHERE OR HAVING clause of
the subquery. If the select list of the subquery has a reference to
the parent select make sure to use the reference and not the original
item.
because internally setup_wild() adjusts select_lex->with_wild directly
anyway, so there is no reason to pretend that the number of '*' may be
anything else but select_lex->with_wild
And don't update select_lex->item_list, because fields can come
from anywhere and don't necessarily have to be copied into select_lex.
Shift-Reduce conflicts prevented parsing some queries with subqueries that
used set operations when the subqueries occurred in expressions or in IN
predicands.
The grammar rules for query expression were transformed in order to avoid
these conflicts. New grammar rules employ an idea taken from MySQL 8.0.
Step #2: "[ORDER BY ...] LIMIT n" should not prevent EXISTS-to-IN
conversion, as long as
- the LIMIT clause doesn't have OFFSET
- the LIMIT is not "LIMIT 0".
Step 1: Removal of ORDER BY [LIMIT] from the subquery should be done
earlier and for broader class of subqueries.
The rewrite was done in Item_in_subselect::select_in_like_transformer(),
but this had problems:
- It didn't cover EXISTS subqueries
- It covered IN-subqueries, but was done after the semi-join transformation
was considered inapplicable, because ORDER BY was present.
Remaining issue:
- EXISTS->IN transformation happens before
check_and_do_in_subquery_rewrites() is called, so it is still prevented
by the present ORDER BY.
