some of the tables are created in InnoDB and some tables are created in MyISAM.
We need to create all tables on InnoDB. Fix is to add engine=innodb to the
CREATE TABLE statements.
approved in IM by Marko and Vasil.
FROM A FUNCTION
Scenario:
In a stored procedure, CREATE TABLE statement is not allowed. But an
exception is provided for CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE. We can create a temporary
table in a stored procedure.
Let there be two stored functions f1 and f2 and two stored procedures p1 and
p2. Their properties are as follows:
. stored function f1() calls stored procedure p1().
. stored function f2() calls stored procedure p2().
. stored procedure p1() creates temporary table t1.
. stored procedure p2() does DML on t1.
Consider the following situation:
1. Autocommit mode is on.
2. select f1()
3. select f2()
Step 2: In this step, t1 would be created via p1(). A table level transaction
lock would have been taken. The ::external_lock() would not have been called
on this table. At the end of step 2, because of autocommit mode on, this table
level lock will be released.
Step 3: When we execute DML on table t1 via p2() we have two problems:
Problem 1:
The function ha_innobase::external_lock() would have been called but since
it is a select query no table level locks would have been taken. Hence the
following assert will fail:
ut_ad(lock_table_has(thr_get_trx(thr), index->table, LOCK_IX));
Solution:
The solution would be to identify this situation and take a table level lock
and use the proper lock type prebuilt->select_lock_type = LOCK_X for DML
operations.
Problem 2:
Another problem is that in step 3, ha_innobase::open() is never called on
the table t1.
Solution:
The solution would be to identify this situation and call re-init the handler
of table t1.
rb#6429 approved by Krunal.
Problem:
Creation of a table fails when innodb_strict_mode is enabled, but the same
table is created without any warning when innodb_strict_mode is enabled.
Solution:
If creation of a table fails with an error when innodb_strict_mode is
enabled, it must issue a warning when innodb_strict_mode is disabled.
rb#6723 approved by Krunal.
Problem:
We maintain two rb trees in each dict_table_t. The foreign_rbt must be in
sync with foreign_list. The referenced_rbt must be in sync with
referenced_list. There is one function which checks this consistency and it
failed, resulting in an assert failure.
The root cause of the problem was identified that the search order was
lost in the referenced_rbt. This is because while renaming the table,
we didn't not refresh this referenced_rbt.
Solution:
When a foreign key is renamed, we must delete and re-insert into both
foreign_rbt and referenced_rbt.
rb#6412 approved by Jimmy.
Bug#16415173 CRLF INSTEAD OF LF IN SQL-BENCH SCRIPTS
Correct perms and converts from Windows style to UNIX style line endings on some files.
Fix perms on installed ini files.
(MySQL 5.5 version)
SLOW/CRASHES SEMAPHORE
Problem:
There are 2 lakh tables - fk_000001, fk_000002 ... fk_200000. All of them
are related to the same parent_table through a foreign key constraint.
When the parent_table is loaded into the dictionary cache, all the child table
will also be loaded. This is taking lot of time. Since this operation happens
when the dictionary latch is taken, the scenario leads to "long semaphore wait"
situation and the server gets killed.
Analysis:
A simple performance analysis showed that the slowness is because of the
dict_foreign_find() function. It does a linear search on two linked list
table->foreign_list and table->referenced_list, looking for a particular
foreign key object based on foreign->id as the key. This is called two
times for each foreign key object.
Solution:
Introduce a rb tree in table->foreign_rbt and table->referenced_rbt, which
are some sort of index on table->foreign_list and table->referenced_list
respectively, using foreign->id as the key. These rbt structures will be
solely used by dict_foreign_find().
rb#5599 approved by Vasil
FAILING ASSERTION: FLEN == LEN
Problem:
Broken invariant triggered when building a unique index on a
binary column and the input data contains duplicate keys. This was broken
in debug builds only.
Fix:
Fixed length of the binary datatype can be greater than length of
the shorter prefix on which index is being created.
Problem:
In the clustered index, when an update operation is done the overall
scenario (after rb#4479) is as follows:
1. Delete mark the old record that is to be updated.
2. The old record disowns the blobs.
3. Insert the new record into clustered index.
4. For non-updated blobs, new record must own it. Verified by assert.
5. For non-updated blobs, in new record marked as inherited.
Scenario involving DB_LOCK_WAIT:
If step 3 times out, then we will skip 1 and 2 and will continue from
step 3. This skipping is achieved by the UPD_NODE_INSERT_BLOB state.
In this case, step 4 is not correct. Because of step 1, the new
record need not own the blobs. Hence the assert failure.
Solution:
The assert in step 4 is removed. Instead code is added to ensure that
the record owns the blob.
Note:
This is a regression caused by rb#4479.
rb#4571 approved by Marko
AUTO_INCREMENT_INCREMENT
Problem:
=======
When auto_increment_increment system variable decreases,
immediate next value of auto increment column is not affected.
Solution:
========
Get the previous inserted value of auto increment column by
subtracting the previous auto_increment_increment from next
auto increment value. After that calculate the current autoinc value
using newly changed auto_increment_increment variable.
Approved by Sunny [rb#4394]
Problem:
The function row_upd_changes_ord_field_binary() is used to decide whether to
use row_upd_clust_rec_by_insert() or row_upd_clust_rec(). The function
row_upd_changes_ord_field_binary() does not make use of charset information.
Based on binary comparison it decides that r1 and r2 differ in their ordering
fields.
In the function row_upd_clust_rec_by_insert(), an update is done by delete +
insert. These operations internally make use of cmp_dtuple_rec_with_match()
to compare records r1 and r2. This comparison takes place with the use of
charset information.
This means that it is possible for the deleted record to be reused in the
subsequent insert. In the given scenario, the characters 'a' and 'A' are
considered equal in the my_charset_latin1. When this happens, the ownership
information of externally stored blobs are not correctly handled.
Solution:
When an update is done by delete followed by insert, disown the relevant
externally stored fields during the delete marking itself (within the same
mtr). If the insert succeeds, then nothing with respect to blob ownership
needs to be done. If the insert fails, then the disown done earlier will be
removed when the operation is rolled back.
rb#4479 approved by Marko.
Fix :
-------
Created separate suites called innodb_zip ans i_innodb_zip that contain all compression tests.
Running the new suites with following compression-related parameters :
* innodb_compression_level = {1/9}
* innodb_log_compressed_pages = {ON/OFF}
INDEX_READ_MAP HAD NO MATCH
If index_read_map is called for exact search and no matching records
exists it will position the cursor on the next record, but still having the
relative position to BTR_PCUR_ON.
This will make a call for index_next to read yet another next record,
instead of returning the record the cursor points to.
Fixed by setting pcur->rel_pos = BTR_PCUR_BEFORE if an exact
[prefix] search is done, but failed.
Also avoids optimistic restoration if rel_pos != BTR_PCUR_ON,
since btr_cur may be different than old_rec.
rb#3324, approved by Marko and Jimmy
WITH A VARIABLE AND ORDER BY
Bug#16035412 MYSQL SERVER 5.5.29 WRONG SORTING USING COMPLEX INDEX
This is a fix for a regression introduced by Bug#12667154:
Bug#12667154 attempted to fix a performance problem with subqueries
that did filesort. For doing filesort, the optimizer creates a quick
select object to use when building the sort index. This quick select
object was deleted after the first call to create_sort_index(). Thus,
for queries where the subquery was executed multiple times, the quick
object was only used for the first execution. For all later executions
of the subquery, filesort used a complete table scan for building the
sort index. The fix for Bug#12667154 tried to fix this by not deleting
the quick object after the first execution of create_sort_index() so
that it would be re-used for building the sort index by the following
executions of the subquery.
This regression introduced in Bug#12667154 is that due to not deleting
the quick select object after building the sort index, the quick
object could in some cases be used also during the second phase of the
execution of the subquery instead of using the created sort
index. This caused wrong results to be returned.
The fix for this issue is to delete the reference to the select object
after it has been used in create_sort_index(). In this way the select
and quick objects will not be available when doing the second phase
of the execution of the select operation. To ensure that the select
object can be re-used for the following executions of the subquery
we make a copy of the select pointer. This is used for restoring the
select object after the select operation is completed.
btr_lift_page_up() writes wrong page number (different by -1) for upper than father page.
But in almost all of the cases, the father page should be root page, no upper
pages. It is very rare path.
In addition the leaf page should not be lifted unless the father page is root.
Because the branch pages should not become the leaf pages.
rb://1336 approved by Marko Makela.
btr_lift_page_up() writes wrong page number (different by -1) for upper than father page.
But in almost all of the cases, the father page should be root page, no upper
pages. It is very rare path.
In addition the leaf page should not be lifted unless the father page is root.
Because the branch pages should not become the leaf pages.
rb://1336 approved by Marko Makela.
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.
-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.
-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION
A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot. After
the transaction is started new indexes are added to the
table. Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
chooses an index. When the index scan is being initialized
via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports
the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message
stating that "insufficient history for index".
This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer. But
the my_error() api is never called. The statement level
diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error
status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).
Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
fails.
516 case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
517 default:
518 DBUG_ASSERT(0);
519 error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
520 break;
The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652
and 11746399.
14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED
rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.
Backport from mysql-5.6 the fix
(revision-id sunny.bains@oracle.com-20120315045831-20rgfa4cozxmz7kz)
Bug#13839886 - CRASH IN INNOBASE_NEXT_AUTOINC
The assertion introduce in the fix for Bug#13817703
is too strong, a negative number can be greater
than the column max value, when the column value is
a negative number.
rb://978 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
rb:1236 approved by Marko Makela
Backporting the WL#5716, "Information schema table for InnoDB
buffer pool information". Backporting revisions 2876.244.113,
2876.244.102 from mysql-trunk.
rb://1177 approved by Jimmy Yang.
BY A CONCURRENT TRANSACTIO
The member function QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::init_ror_merged_scan() performs
a table handler clone. Innodb does not provide a clone operation.
The ha_innobase::clone() is not there. The handler::clone() does not
take care of the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type. Because of
this what happens is that for one index we do a locking read, and
for the other index we were doing a non-locking (consistent) read.
The patch introduces ha_innobase::clone() member function.
It is implemented similar to ha_myisam::clone(). It calls the
base class handler::clone() and then does any additional operation
required. I am setting the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type
correctly.
rb://1060 approved by Marko
UNHANDLED, CONFUSING ERROR
The main confusion with the error message is that "it
implies that your data dictionary may now be out of
sync". This patch will remove the unwanted and the
misleading error message by not doing an unnecessary
operation in the error handling code.
rb://980 approved by: Dmitry Lenev
Fix the calculation of the next autoinc value when offset > 1. Some of the
results have changed due to the changes in the allocation calculation. The
new calculation will result in slightly bigger gaps for bulk inserts.
rb://866 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
Backported from mysql-trunk (5.6)
truncating, inserting the same set of rows. When a table is
re-created with the same set of rows, the data file size must
not grow.
rb:968
Approved by Marko.
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1
rb:961
rb:947
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
rb:947
approved by Jimmy Yang
