semijoin=on,firstmatch=on,loosescan=on
to
semijoin=off,firstmatch=off,loosescan=off
Adjust the testcases:
- Modify subselect*.test and join_cache.test so that all tests
use the same execution paths as before (i.e. optimizations that
are being tested are enabled)
- Let all other test files run with the new default settings (i.e.
with new optimizations disabled)
- Copy subquery testcases from these files into t/subselect_extra.test
which will run them with new optimizations enabled.
- in advance_sj_state(), remember join->cur_dups_producing_tables in
pos->prefix_dups_producing_tables *before* we modify it, so that
restore_prev_sj_state() restores cur_dups_producing_tables in all cases.
- Updated test results in subselect_sj2[_jcl6].result (the original EXPLAIN
was invalid there)
- "Using MRR" is no longer shown with range access.
- Instead, both range and BKA accesses will show one of the following:
= "Rowid-ordered scan"
= "Key-ordered scan"
= "Key-ordered Rowid-ordered scan"
depending on whether DS-MRR implementation will do scan keys in order, rowids in order,
or both.
- The patch also introduces a way for other storage engines/MRR implementations to
pass information to EXPLAIN output about the properties of employed MRR scans.
Made sure that the optimal fields are used by TABLE_REF objects
when building index access keys to joined tables.
Fixed a bug in the template function that sorts the elements of
a list using the bubble sort algorithm. The bug caused poor
performance of the function. Also added an optimization that
skips comparison with the most heavy elements that has been
already properly placed in the list.
Made the comparison of the fields belonging to the same Item_equal
more granular: fields belonging to the same table are also ordered
according to some rules.
plans or wrong results due to the fact that JOIN_CACHE functions
ignored the possibility of interleaving materialized semijoin
tables with tables whose records were stored in join buffers.
This fixes would become mostly unnecessary if the new code of
mwl 90 was merged into 5.3 right now.
Yet the fix the code of optimize_wo_join_buffering was needed
in any case.
Applied the fix for bug #47217 from the mysql-6.0 codebase.
The patch adds not null predicates generated for the left parts
of the equality predicates used for ref accesses. This is done
for such predicates both in where conditions and on conditions.
For the where conditions the not null predicates were generated
but in 5.0/5.1 they actually never were used due to some lame
merge from 4.1 to 5.0. The fix for bug #47217 made these
predicates to be used in the condition pushed to the tables.
Yet only this patch generates not null predicates for equality
predicated from on conditions of outer joins.
This patch introduces a performance regression that can be
observed on a test case from null_key.test. The regression
will disappear after the fix for bug #57024 from mariadb-5.1
is pulled into mariadb-5.3.
The patch contains many changes in the outputs of the EXPLAIN
commands since generated not null predicates are considered as
parts of the conditions pushed to join tables and may add
'Usingwhere' in some rows of EXPLAINs where there used
to be no such comments.
- Unify EXPLAIN printout for <subqueryN> tables with regular tables
- Update test results for <subqueryN> tables:
s/unique_key/distinct_key/g
s/1.0/100.0/ for "filtered" column
- Change "SUBQUERY#n" to "<subquery{n}>" in EXPLAIN output. We need to it to be
lowercase so that EXPLAIN results do not differ in case between systems with
case-sensitive and case-insensitive filesystems.
- Remove garbage comments, add better comments.
- Add Item_in_subselect::get_identifier() that returns subquery's id
- Change select_describe() to produce output in new format
- Update test results (checked)
- The problem was that DuplicateWeedout strategy setup code wasn't aware of the
fact that join buffering will be used and applied optimization that doesn't work
together with join buffering. Fixed by making DuplicateWeedout setup code to have
a pessimistic check about whether there is a chance that join buffering will be
used.
- Make JOIN_CACHE_BKA::init() correctly process Copy_field elements that denote saving
current rowids in the join buffer.
mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2.result:
Update test results
mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_jcl6.result:
Update test results
mysql-test/r/subselect_sj_jcl6.result:
Testcase
mysql-test/t/subselect_sj2.test:
Update test results
mysql-test/t/subselect_sj_jcl6.test:
Testcase
sql/opt_subselect.cc:
- The problem was that DuplicateWeedout strategy setup code wasn't aware of the
fact that join buffering will be used and applied optimization that doesn't work
together with join buffering. Fixed by making DuplicateWeedout setup code to have
a pessimistic check about whether there is a chance that join buffering will be
used.
sql/sql_join_cache.cc:
Make JOIN_CACHE_BKA::init() correctly process Copy_field elements that denote saving current rowids in the join buffer.
sql/sql_select.cc:
Added a question note
