Commit graph

499 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alfranio Correia
a0e606cb82 Post-fix after mysql-5.1-rep+2 --> mysql-5.1-rep+3. 2009-11-11 16:35:58 +00:00
Alfranio Correia
ada4ae340a Post-fix for merge mysql-5.1-rep+2 --> mysql-5.1-rep+3 2009-11-11 13:51:49 +00:00
Andrei Elkin
d09bded416 merging 5.1 main -> 5.1-rep+2 -> 5.1-rep+3; binlog_unsafe , rpl_mysql_upgrade fail and are under treatment 2009-11-10 20:45:15 +02:00
Andrei Elkin
69d6fcbd3b merging 5.1 main -> rpl+2. Some manual work required mostly due to bug46640 2009-11-06 18:35:04 +02:00
Alfranio Correia
60d4662496 WL#2687 WL#5072 BUG#40278 BUG#47175
Non-transactional updates that take place inside a transaction present problems
for logging because they are visible to other clients before the transaction
is committed, and they are not rolled back even if the transaction is rolled
back. It is not always possible to log correctly in statement format when both
transactional and non-transactional tables are used in the same transaction.

In the current patch, we ensure that such scenario is completely safe under the
ROW and MIXED modes.
2009-11-03 19:02:56 +00:00
He Zhenxing
9d59dfb5d2 Auto merge from 5.1-rep+2 2009-10-29 15:14:50 +08:00
He Zhenxing
ea84da107a Auto merge from 5.1-rep+2-delivery1 2009-10-27 18:28:40 +08:00
He Zhenxing
42743de67d Auto merge 5.1-rep-semisync to 5.1-rep+2-delivery1 2009-10-23 21:34:07 +08:00
He Zhenxing
b6529a140b Add semi-sync support for Windows 2009-10-23 12:56:30 +08:00
eddd5403a7 BUG #13963
Postfix
2009-10-23 10:19:50 +08:00
d17245e772 Bug#13963 SHOW SLAVE HOSTS is unreliable
Before the patch, slaves only appear in the output of SHOW SLAVE HOSTS 
      when report-host option is set. If an expected slave does not appear in  
      the list, nobody knows whether the slave does not connect or has started
      without the "report-host" option. The output also contains a strange  
      field "Rpl_recovery_rank" which has never been implemented and the manual 
      of MySQL5.4 declares that the field has been removed from MySQL5.4.
                                        
      This patch is done with these,
      According to the manual of MySQL5.4, "Rpl_recovery_rank" is removed.
      Slaves will register themselves to master no matter if report_host option is set
      or not. When slaves are registering themselves, their Server_ids, report_host
      and other information are together sent to master. Sever_ids are never null 
      and is unique in one replication group. Slaves always can be identified with  
      different Server_ids no matter if report_host exists.
2009-10-20 14:30:15 +08:00
Sven Sandberg
425ae51f7a BUG#39934: Slave stops for engine that only support row-based logging
Post-push fix.
Problem: In a previous patch for BUG#39934, rpl_idempotency.test
was split in two tests. The mtr suppressions in the original test
did not make it into the new test. This caused pushbuild warnings.
Fix: copy the mtr suppressions from rpl_idempotency.test to
rpl_row_idempotency.test
2009-10-19 15:12:59 +02:00
He Zhenxing
ae107c5581 Manual merge 5.1-rep+2 to 5.1-rep+3 2009-10-18 11:57:38 +08:00
Sven Sandberg
73b296c4c4 BUG#39934: Slave stops for engine that only support row-based logging
Post-push fix.
Problem: After the original bugfix, if a statement is unsafe,
binlog_format=mixed, and engine is statement-only, a warning was
generated and the statement executed. However, it is a fundamental
principle of binlogging that binlog_format=mixed should guarantee
correct logging, no compromise. So correct behavior is to generate
an error and don't execute the statement.
Fix: Generate error instead of warning.
Since issue_unsafe_warnings can only generate one error message,
this allows us to simplify the code a bit too:
decide_logging_format does not have to save the error code for
issue_unsafe_warnings
2009-10-14 18:32:08 +02:00
He Zhenxing
b289e515aa Auto merge 5.1-rep-semisync 2009-10-13 10:28:02 +08:00
He Zhenxing
b92ec52915 Backport BUG#47298 Semisync: always wait until timeout if no semi-sync slave available
Add an option to control whether the master should keep waiting
until timeout when it detected that there is no semi-sync slave
available.

The bool option 'rpl_semi_sync_master_wait_no_slave' is 1 by
defalt, and will keep waiting until timeout. When set to 0, the
master will switch to asynchronous replication immediately when
no semi-sync slave is available.
2009-10-12 21:15:32 +08:00
He Zhenxing
64fc766c93 BUG#45674 FLUSH STATUS does not reset semisynchronous counters
Semi-sync status were not reset by FLUSH STATUS, this was because
all semi-sync status variables are defined as SHOW_FUNC and FLUSH
STATUS could only reset SHOW_LONG type variables.

This problem is fixed by change all status variables that should
be reset by FLUSH STATUS from SHOW_FUNC to SHOW_LONG.

After the fix, the following status variables will be reset by
FLUSH STATUS:
  Rpl_semi_sync_master_yes_tx
  Rpl_semi_sync_master_no_tx

Note: normally, FLUSH STATUS itself will be written into binlog
and be replicated, so after FLUSH STATS, one of
  Rpl_semi_sync_master_yes_tx
  Rpl_semi_sync_master_no_tx
can be 1 dependent on the semi-sync status. So it's recommended
to use FLUSH NO_WRITE_TO_BINLOG STATUS to avoid this.
2009-10-12 21:03:04 +08:00
He Zhenxing
55842061e7 Backport BUG#45848 Semisynchronous replication internals are visible in SHOW PROCESSLIST and logs
Semi-sync uses an extra connection from slave to master to send
replies, this is a normal client connection, and used a normal
SET query to set the reply information on master, which is visible
to user and may cause some confusion and complaining.

This problem is fixed by using the method of sending reply by
using the same connection that is used by master dump thread to
send binlog to slave. Since now the semi-sync plugins are integrated
with the server code, it is not a problem to use the internal net
interfaces to do this.

The master dump thread will mark the event requires a reply and
wait for the reply when the event just sent is the last event
of a transaction and semi-sync status is ON; And the slave will
send a reply to master when it received such an event that requires
a reply.
2009-10-12 20:55:01 +08:00
Serge Kozlov
2151a821aa Bug#42891: Tests cleanup
Fix for backport into mysql-5.1-rep+2
2009-10-10 14:27:07 +04:00
Andrei Elkin
124ad21d01 backporting fixes of bug@45940 to 5.1-rpl+2 to cover failures rpl_heartbeat_* as well. 2009-10-09 16:26:37 +03:00
Serge Kozlov
6507f04de2 WL#4641, Bug#43828: fix for rpl_heartbeat_basic.test:
The issue appears when number of heartbeat events non-zero before start of test
block. But really we need to check that no new events has received during test block.
So I did following:
1. Replace absolute values by diff of values
2. Increase heartbeat period from 1.5 to 5 sec
2009-10-07 19:44:01 +04:00
Alfranio Correia
2a243fa2ce mysql-5.1-bugteam (local) --> mysql-5.1-bugteam 2009-10-06 11:25:36 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
b31e0c9a48 BUG#47678 Changes to n-tables that happen early in a trans. are only flushed upon commit
Let
    - T be a transactional table and N non-transactional table.
    - B be begin, C commit and R rollback.
    - N be a statement that accesses and changes only N-tables.
    - T be a statement that accesses and changes only T-tables.

In RBR, changes to N-tables that happen early in a transaction are not immediately flushed
upon committing a statement. This behavior may, however, break consistency in the presence
of concurrency since changes done to N-tables become immediately visible to other
connections. To fix this problem, we do the following:

  . B N N T C would log - B N C B N C B T C.
  . B N N T R would log - B N C B N C B T R.

Note that we are not preserving history from the master as we are introducing a commit that
never happened. However, this seems to be more acceptable than the possibility of breaking
consistency in the presence of concurrency.
2009-10-06 01:54:00 +01:00
Serge Kozlov
d77bd29c69 WL#3788
It is backport patch.
This adds new test case for testing affects of some variables to replication.
2009-10-03 22:21:44 +04:00
He Zhenxing
62d218edfe Manual merge semi-sync to 5.1-rep+2 2009-10-03 18:50:25 +08:00
He Zhenxing
e9ba06009d Auto merge 2009-10-03 10:07:03 +08:00
Serge Kozlov
87a5e68634 WL#4641 Heartbeat testing
This is backport for next-mr.

The patch adds new test cases that cover replication heartbeat testing.
2009-10-02 23:24:40 +04:00
Andrei Elkin
d0c5656eb8 fixing tests results: rpl_ndb_log, rpl_ndb_multi, sp_trans_log; adding replicate-ignore_server_ids specific tests 2009-10-02 16:15:54 +03:00
He Zhenxing
0ec47798fd Backport fixes for the follow tests
binlog_tmp_table
rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB
rpl_slave_status
2009-10-02 17:24:21 +08:00
He Zhenxing
fa7395c9a1 Backport Post fix of result files after push of BUG#34227 2009-10-02 17:12:10 +08:00
He Zhenxing
79faadd54d Backport BUG#12190 CHANGE MASTER has differ path requiremts on MASTER_LOG_FILE and RELAY_LOG_FILE
CHANGE MASTER TO command required the value for RELAY_LOG_FILE to
be an absolute path, which was different from the requirement of
MASTER_LOG_FILE.

This patch fixed the problem by changing the value for RELAY_LOG_FILE
to be the basename of the log file as that for MASTER_LOG_FILE.
2009-10-02 16:35:03 +08:00
Andrei Elkin
6d1ad12428 merge from 5.1-rpl+2 repo to a local branch with HB and bug@27808 fixes 2009-10-01 20:22:44 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
f68119a745 backporting bug@27808 fixes 2009-10-01 19:44:53 +03:00
5903c1e94c Bug #45677 Slave stops with Duplicate entry for key PRIMARY when using trigger
The problem is that there is only one autoinc value associated with 
the query when binlogging. If more than one autoinc values are used 
in the query, the autoinc values after the first one can be inserted 
wrongly on slave. So these autoinc values can become inconsistent on 
master and slave.

The problem is resolved by marking all the statements that invoke 
a trigger or call a function that updated autoinc fields as unsafe, 
and will switch to row-format in Mixed mode. Actually, the statement 
is safe if just one autoinc value is used in sub-statement, but it's 
impossible to check how many autoinc values are used in sub-statement.)
2009-10-01 07:19:36 +08:00
Sven Sandberg
31193a632e merged fixes for BUG#39934 to 5.1-rpl+3
Also renamed current_stmt_binlog_row_based to
current_stmt_binlog_format_row for consistency
2009-09-30 18:00:22 +02:00
Alfranio Correia
47599b5db2 Post-fix for BUG#43789
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
2009-09-30 15:17:15 +01:00
Luis Soares
19e6d1c596 Automerge: mysql-5.1-rep+2 (local backports) --> mysql-5.1-rep+2 (local latest) 2009-09-30 12:48:22 +01:00
He Zhenxing
7771b90295 Back porting the test case for semi-sync 2009-09-30 16:09:31 +08:00
Alfranio Correia
a48ff22004 BUG#40337 Fsyncing master and relay log to disk after every event is too slow
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
      
The fix proposed in BUG#35542 and BUG#31665 introduces a performance issue
when fsyncing the master.info, relay.info and relay-log.bin* after #th events.
Although such solution has been proposed to reduce the probability of corrupted
files due to a slave-crash, the performance penalty introduced by it has
made the approach impractical for highly intensive workloads.
      
In a nutshell, the option --syn-relay-log proposed in BUG#35542 and BUG#31665
simultaneously fsyncs master.info, relay-log.info and relay-log.bin* and
this is the main source of performance issues.
      
This patch introduces new options that give more control to the user on
what should be fsynced and how often:
      
   1) (--sync-master-info, integer) which syncs the master.info after #th event;
   2) (--sync-relay-log, integer) which syncs the relay-log.bin* after #th
   events.
   3) (--sync-relay-log-info, integer) which syncs the relay.info after #th
   transactions.
      
   To provide both performance and increased reliability, we recommend the following
   setup:
      
   1) --sync-master-info = 0 eventually the operating system will fsync it;
   2) --sync-relay-log = 0 eventually the operating system will fsync it;
   3) --sync-relay-log-info = 1 fsyncs it after every transaction;
      
Notice, that the previous setup does not reduce the probability of
corrupted master.info and relay-log.bin*. To overcome the issue, this patch also
introduces a recovery mechanism that right after restart throws away relay-log.bin*
retrieved from a master and updates the master.info based on the relay.info:
      
      
   4) (--relay-log-recovery, boolean) which enables a recovery mechanism that
   throws away relay-log.bin* after a crash.
      
However, it can only recover the incorrect binlog file and position in master.info,
if other informations (host, port password, etc) are corrupted or incorrect,
then this recovery mechanism will fail to work.
2009-09-29 15:40:52 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
63278c561c BUG#43789 different master/slave table defs cause crash: text/varchar null
vs not null

NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
                        
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
                        
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
                        
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
                        
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
                        
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
                        
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
                  
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
                  
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                  
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
                  
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
                  
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
                  
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
                  
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
2009-09-29 15:18:44 +01:00
Luis Soares
19ac26274b BUG#28796: CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_HOST="" leads to invalid master.info
NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
                
This patch addresses the bug reported by checking wether 
host argument is an empty string or not. If empty, an error is
reported to the client, otherwise continue normally.
                       
This commit is based on the originally proposed patch and adds 
a test case as requested during review as well as refines comments, 
and makes test case result file less verbose (compared to previous patch).
2009-09-29 15:09:46 +01:00
Luis Soares
7cf996223d BUG#23300: Slow query log on slave does not log slow replicated statements
NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
      
When using replication, the slave will not log any slow query logs queries 
replicated from the master, even if the option "--log-slow-slave-statements" 
is set and these take more than "log_query_time" to execute.
              
In order to log slow queries in replicated thread one needs to set the
--log-slow-slave-statements, so that the SQL thread is initialized with the 
correct switch. Although setting this flag correctly configures the slave 
thread option to log slow queries, there is an issue with the condition that 
is used to check whether to log the slow query or not. When replaying binlog 
events the statement contains the SET TIMESTAMP clause which will force the 
slow logging condition check to fail. Consequently, the slow query logging will
not take place.
              
This patch addresses this issue by removing the second condition from the
log_slow_statements as it prevents slow queries to be binlogged and seems 
to be deprecated.
2009-09-29 15:09:01 +01:00
Alfranio Correia
bbc830f7fc BUG#38173 Field doesn't have a default value with row-based replication
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
      
The reason of  the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
            
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
            
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a 
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
2009-09-29 15:04:21 +01:00
Tatiana A. Nurnberg
ba6bd99620 auto-merge 2009-09-29 06:08:18 -07:00
Andrei Elkin
a029813bf7 WL#342 heartbeat
Backporting the basic tests
2009-09-29 14:18:41 +03:00
Andrei Elkin
c03549bf05 WL#342 heartbeat
backporting from 6.0 code base to 5.1.
2009-09-29 14:16:23 +03:00
Luis Soares
d28ef002d7 BUG#28777, WL#4293: SHOW BINLOG EVENTS does not work on relay log
files

NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
            
SHOW BINLOG EVENTS does not work with relay log files. If issuing
"SHOW BINLOG EVENTS IN 'relay-log.000001'" in a non-empty relay
log file (relay-log.000001), mysql reports empty set.
            
This patch addresses this issue by extending the SHOW command
with RELAYLOG. Events in relay log files can now be inspected by
issuing SHOW RELAYLOG EVENTS [IN 'log_name'] [FROM pos] [LIMIT
[offset,] row_count].
2009-09-29 00:04:20 +01:00
Tatiana A. Nurnberg
197182d749 Bug#43746: YACC return wrong query string when parse 'load data infile' sql statement
"load data" statements were written to the binlog as a mix of the original statement
and bits recreated from parse-info. This relied on implementation details and broke
with IGNORE_SPACES and versioned comments.

We now completely resynthesize the query for LOAD DATA for binlog (which among other
things normalizes them somewhat with regard to case, spaces, etc.).
We have already parsed the query properly, so we make use of that rather
than mix-and-match string literals and parsed items.
This should make us safe with regard to versioned comments, even those
spanning multiple tokens. Also no longer affected by IGNORE_SPACES.
2009-09-28 05:41:10 -07:00
90d4b21d1d BUG#43579 mysql_upgrade tries to alter log tables on replicated database
All statements executed by mysql_upgrade are binlogged and then are replicated to slave.
This will result in some errors. The report of this bug has demonstrated some examples.

Master and slave should be upgraded separately. All statements executed by
mysql_upgrade will not be binlogged. 
--write-binlog and --skip-write-binlog options are added into mysql_upgrade. 
These options control whether sql statements are binlogged or not.
2009-09-28 14:24:19 +08:00
Luis Soares
80f96fae63 BUG#47312: RBR: Disabling key on slave breaks replication:
HA_ERR_WRONG_INDEX
      
In RBR, disabling keys on slave table will break replication when
updating or deleting a record. When the slave thread tries to
find the row, by searching in the storage engine, it checks
whether the table has a key or not. If it has one, then the slave
thread uses it to search the record.
      
Nonetheless, the slave only checks whether the key exists or not,
it does not verify if it is active. Should the key be
disabled (eg, DBA has issued an ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE KEYS)
then it will result in error: HA_ERR_WRONG_INDEX.
      
This patch addresses this issue by making the slave thread also
check whether the key is active or not before actually using it.
2009-09-27 22:02:47 +01:00