InnoDB does not attempt to handle lower_case_table_names == 2 when looking
up foreign table names and referenced table name. It turned that server
variable into a boolean and ignored the possibility of it being '2'.
The setting lower_case_table_names == 2 means that it should be stored and
displayed in mixed case as given, but compared internally in lower case.
Normally the server deals with this since it stores table names. But
InnoDB stores referential constraints for the server, so it needs to keep
track of both lower case and given names.
This solution creates two table name pointers for each foreign and referenced
table name. One to display the name, and one to look it up. Both pointers
point to the same allocated string unless this setting is 2. So the overhead
added is not too much.
Two functions are created in dict0mem.c to populate the ..._lookup versions
of these pointers. Both dict_mem_foreign_table_name_lookup_set() and
dict_mem_referenced_table_name_lookup_set() are called 5 times each.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 3550
revision-id: marko.makela@oracle.com-20100824081003-v4ecy0tga99cpxw2
parent: marko.makela@oracle.com-20100823102854-t1clrojqis2ley36
committer: Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: 5.1-innodb
timestamp: Tue 2010-08-24 11:10:03 +0300
message:
Bug#55832: selects crash too easily when innodb_force_recovery>3
dict_update_statistics_low(): Create bogus statistics for those
indexes that cannot be accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery
setting.
ha_innobase::info(): Calculate statistics for each index, even if
innodb_force_recovery is set. Fill in bogus data for those indexes
that are not accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery setting.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 3550
revision-id: marko.makela@oracle.com-20100824081003-v4ecy0tga99cpxw2
parent: marko.makela@oracle.com-20100823102854-t1clrojqis2ley36
committer: Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: 5.1-innodb
timestamp: Tue 2010-08-24 11:10:03 +0300
message:
Bug#55832: selects crash too easily when innodb_force_recovery>3
dict_update_statistics_low(): Create bogus statistics for those
indexes that cannot be accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery
setting.
ha_innobase::info(): Calculate statistics for each index, even if
innodb_force_recovery is set. Fill in bogus data for those indexes
that are not accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery setting.
dict_update_statistics_low(): Create bogus statistics for those
indexes that cannot be accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery
setting.
ha_innobase::info(): Calculate statistics for each index, even if
innodb_force_recovery is set. Fill in bogus data for those indexes
that are not accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery setting.
dict_update_statistics_low(): Create bogus statistics for those
indexes that cannot be accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery
setting.
ha_innobase::info(): Calculate statistics for each index, even if
innodb_force_recovery is set. Fill in bogus data for those indexes
that are not accessed because of the innodb_force_recovery setting.
The callers should indicate that the dictionary is locked or not using
the trx->dict_operation_lock_mode == RW_X_LATCH mode. Checking explicitly
for system tables is unnecessary.
Approved by Marko on IRC.
The callers should indicate that the dictionary is locked or not using
the trx->dict_operation_lock_mode == RW_X_LATCH mode. Checking explicitly
for system tables is unnecessary.
Approved by Marko on IRC.
Merge and adjust a forgotten change to fix this bug.
rb://393 approved by Jimmy Yang
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r3794 | marko | 2009-01-07 14:14:53 +0000 (Wed, 07 Jan 2009) | 18 lines
branches/6.0: Allow the minimum length of a multi-byte character to be
up to 4 bytes. (Bug #35391)
dtype_t, dict_col_t: Replace mbminlen:2, mbmaxlen:3 with mbminmaxlen:5.
In this way, the 5 bits can hold two values of 0..4, and the storage size
of the fields will not cross the 64-bit boundary. Encode the values as
DATA_MBMAX * mbmaxlen + mbminlen. Define the auxiliary macros
DB_MBMINLEN(mbminmaxlen), DB_MBMAXLEN(mbminmaxlen), and
DB_MINMAXLEN(mbminlen, mbmaxlen).
Try to trim and pad UTF-16 and UTF-32 with spaces as appropriate.
Alexander Barkov suggested the use of cs->cset->fill(cs, buff, len, 0x20).
ha_innobase::store_key_val_for_row() now does that, but the added function
row_mysql_pad_col() does not, because it doesn't have the MySQL TABLE object.
rb://49 approved by Heikki Tuuri
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merge and adjust a forgotten change to fix this bug.
rb://393 approved by Jimmy Yang
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r3794 | marko | 2009-01-07 14:14:53 +0000 (Wed, 07 Jan 2009) | 18 lines
branches/6.0: Allow the minimum length of a multi-byte character to be
up to 4 bytes. (Bug #35391)
dtype_t, dict_col_t: Replace mbminlen:2, mbmaxlen:3 with mbminmaxlen:5.
In this way, the 5 bits can hold two values of 0..4, and the storage size
of the fields will not cross the 64-bit boundary. Encode the values as
DATA_MBMAX * mbmaxlen + mbminlen. Define the auxiliary macros
DB_MBMINLEN(mbminmaxlen), DB_MBMAXLEN(mbminmaxlen), and
DB_MINMAXLEN(mbminlen, mbmaxlen).
Try to trim and pad UTF-16 and UTF-32 with spaces as appropriate.
Alexander Barkov suggested the use of cs->cset->fill(cs, buff, len, 0x20).
ha_innobase::store_key_val_for_row() now does that, but the added function
row_mysql_pad_col() does not, because it doesn't have the MySQL TABLE object.
rb://49 approved by Heikki Tuuri
------------------------------------------------------------------------
and clarifies the invariant in dict_table_get_on_id().
In Mar 2007 Marko observed a crash during recovery, the crash resulted from
an UNDO operation on a system table. His solution was to acquire an X lock on
the data dictionary, this in hindsight was an overkill. It is unclear what
caused the crash, current hypothesis is that it was a memory corruption.
The X lock results in performance issues by when undoing changes due to
rollback during normal operation on regular tables.
Why the change is safe:
======================
The InnoDB code has changed since the original X lock change was made. In the
new code we always lock the data dictionary in X mode during startup when
UNDOing operations on the system tables (this is a given). This ensures that
the crash Marko observed cannot happen as long as all transactions that update
the system tables follow the standard rules by setting the appropriate DICT_OP
flag when writing the log records when they make the changes.
If transactions violate the above mentioned rule then during recovery (at
startup) the rollback code (see trx0roll.c) will not acquire the X lock
and we will see the crash again. This will however be a different bug.
and clarifies the invariant in dict_table_get_on_id().
In Mar 2007 Marko observed a crash during recovery, the crash resulted from
an UNDO operation on a system table. His solution was to acquire an X lock on
the data dictionary, this in hindsight was an overkill. It is unclear what
caused the crash, current hypothesis is that it was a memory corruption.
The X lock results in performance issues by when undoing changes due to
rollback during normal operation on regular tables.
Why the change is safe:
======================
The InnoDB code has changed since the original X lock change was made. In the
new code we always lock the data dictionary in X mode during startup when
UNDOing operations on the system tables (this is a given). This ensures that
the crash Marko observed cannot happen as long as all transactions that update
the system tables follow the standard rules by setting the appropriate DICT_OP
flag when writing the log records when they make the changes.
If transactions violate the above mentioned rule then during recovery (at
startup) the rollback code (see trx0roll.c) will not acquire the X lock
and we will see the crash again. This will however be a different bug.
and clarifies the invariant in dict_table_get_on_id().
In Mar 2007 Marko observed a crash during recovery, the crash resulted from
an UNDO operation on a system table. His solution was to acquire an X lock on
the data dictionary, this in hindsight was an overkill. It is unclear what
caused the crash, current hypothesis is that it was a memory corruption.
The X lock results in performance issues by when undoing changes due to
rollback during normal operation on regular tables.
Why the change is safe:
======================
The InnoDB code has changed since the original X lock change was made. In the
new code we always lock the data dictionary in X mode during startup when
UNDOing operations on the system tables (this is a given). This ensures that
the crash Marko observed cannot happen as long as all transactions that update
the system tables follow the standard rules by setting the appropriate DICT_OP
flag when writing the log records when they make the changes.
If transactions violate the above mentioned rule then during recovery (at
startup) the rollback code (see trx0roll.c) will not acquire the X lock
and we will see the crash again. This will however be a different bug.
and clarifies the invariant in dict_table_get_on_id().
In Mar 2007 Marko observed a crash during recovery, the crash resulted from
an UNDO operation on a system table. His solution was to acquire an X lock on
the data dictionary, this in hindsight was an overkill. It is unclear what
caused the crash, current hypothesis is that it was a memory corruption.
The X lock results in performance issues by when undoing changes due to
rollback during normal operation on regular tables.
Why the change is safe:
======================
The InnoDB code has changed since the original X lock change was made. In the
new code we always lock the data dictionary in X mode during startup when
UNDOing operations on the system tables (this is a given). This ensures that
the crash Marko observed cannot happen as long as all transactions that update
the system tables follow the standard rules by setting the appropriate DICT_OP
flag when writing the log records when they make the changes.
If transactions violate the above mentioned rule then during recovery (at
startup) the rollback code (see trx0roll.c) will not acquire the X lock
and we will see the crash again. This will however be a different bug.
