optimizer does not honor IGNORE INDEX
- Allow an index to be used for sorting the table
instead of filesort only if it is not disabled by
IGNORE INDEX.
table in a join
The optimizer removes redundant columns in ORDER BY. It is considering
redundant every reference to const table column, e.g b in :
create table t1 (a int, b int, primary key(a));
select 1 from t1 order by b where a = 1
But it must not remove references to const table columns if the
const table is an outer table because there still can be 2 values :
the const value and NULL. e.g.:
create table t1 (a int, b int, primary key(a));
select t2.b c from t1 left join t1 t2 on (t1.a = t2.a and t2.a = 5)
order by c;
Make the encryption functions MD5(), SHA1() and ENCRYPT() return binary results.
Make MAKE_SET() and EXPORT_SET() use the correct character set for their default separator strings.
didn't work as expected: collation_server was set not to xxx,
but to the default collation of character set "yyy".
With different argument order it worked as expected:
mysqld --character-set-server=yyy --collation-server=yyy
Fix:
initializate default_collation_name to 0
when processing --character-set-server
only if --collation-server has not been specified
in command line.
time_format() claimed %H and %k would return at most two digits
(hours 0-23), but this coincided neither with actual behaviour
nor with docs. this is not visible in simple queries; forcing
a temp-table is probably the easiest way to see this. adjusted
the return-length appropriately; the alternative would be to
adjust the docs to say that behaviour for > 99 hours is undefined.
---
Bug#19844: time_format in Union truncates values
time_format() claimed %H and %k would return at most two digits
(hours 0-23), but this coincided neither with actual behaviour
nor with docs. this is not visible in simple queries; forcing
a temp-table is probably the easiest way to see this. adjusted
the return-length appropriately; the alternative would be to
adjust the docs to say that behaviour for > 99 hours is undefined.
"A SELECT privilege on a view is required for SHOW CREATE VIEW and it will stay
that way because of compatibility reasons." (see #20136)
a test case to illustrate how the ACLs work in this case (and ensure they will continue
to do so in the future)
privileges
This problem is 4.1 specific. It doesn't affect 4.0 and was fixed
in 5.x before.
Having any mysql user who is allowed to issue multi table update
statement and any column/table grants, allows this user to update
any table on a server (mysql grant tables are not exception).
check_grant() accepts number of tables (in table list) to be checked
in 5-th param. While checking grants for multi table update, number
of tables must be 1. It must never be 0 (actually we have
DBUG_ASSERT(number > 0) in 5.x in grant_check() function).
Before this fix,
- a runtime error in a statement in a stored procedure with no error handlers
was properly detected (as expected)
- a runtime error in a statement with an error handler inherited from a non
local runtime context (i.e., proc a with a handler, calling proc b) was
properly detected (as expected)
- a runtime error in a statement with a *local* error handler was executed
as follows :
a) the statement would succeed, regardless of the error condition, (bug)
b) the error handler would be called (as expected).
The root cause is that functions like my_messqge_sql would "forget" to set
the thread flag thd->net.report_error to 1, because of the check involving
sp_rcontext::found_handler_here().
Failure to set this flag would cause, later in the call stack,
in Item_func::fix_fields() at line 190, the code to return FALSE and consider
that executing the statement was successful.
With this fix :
- error handling code, that was duplicated in different places in the code,
is now implemented in sp_rcontext::handle_error(),
- handle_error() correctly sets thd->net.report_error when a handler is
present, regardless of the handler location (local, or in the call stack).
A test case, bug8153_subselect, has been written to demonstrate the change
of behavior before and after the fix.
Another test case, bug8153_function_a, as also been writen.
This test has the same behavior before and after the fix.
This test has been written to demonstrate that the previous expected
result of procedure bug18787, was incorrect, since select no_such_function()
should fail and therefore not produce a result.
The incorrect result for bug18787 has the same root cause as Bug#8153,
and the expected result has been adjusted.