Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lena Startseva
72ba96a48e MDEV-27691: make working view-protocol
Tests with checking metadata or that cannot be run with
the view-protocol are excluded from --view-protocol.
For tests that do not allow the use of an additional connection,
the util connection is disabled with "--disable_service_connection".
Also cases with bugs for --view-protocol are disabled.
2022-09-23 17:36:20 +07:00
Oleg Smirnov
40d9dbb28f MDEV-28246 Optimizer uses all partitions after upgrade to 10.3
Cause: a copy of the joined TABLE_LIST is created during multi_update::prepare
and TABLE::pos_in_table_list of the tables are set to point to the new
TABLE_LIST object. This prevents some optimization steps to perform correctly.
Solution: do not update pos_in_table_list during multi_update::prepare
2022-05-19 08:31:01 +04:00
Aleksey Midenkov
ff77a09bda MDEV-22464 Server crash on UPDATE with nested subquery
Uninitialized ref_pointer_array[] because setup_fields() got empty
fields list.  mysql_multi_update() for some reason does that by
substituting the fields list with empty total_list for the
mysql_select() call (looks like wrong merge since total_list is not
used anywhere else and is always empty). The fix would be to return
back the original fields list. But this fails update_use_source.test
case:

  --error ER_BAD_FIELD_ERROR
  update v1 set t1c1=2 order by 1;

Actually not failing the above seems to be ok.

The other fix would be to keep resolve_in_select_list false (and that
keeps outer context from being resolved in
Item_ref::fix_fields()). This fix is more consistent with how SELECT
behaves:

  --error ER_SUBQUERY_NO_1_ROW
  select a from t1 where a= (select 2 from t1 having (a = 3));

So this patch implements this fix.
2021-10-11 13:36:07 +03:00
Igor Babaev
e3a25793be MDEV-24823 Crash with invalid multi-table update of view in 2nd execution of SP
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2021-04-22 20:02:08 -07:00
Aleksey Midenkov
0932c5804d MDEV-20515 multi-update tries to position updated table by null reference
Cause

Join tmp table inserts null row because of OUTER JOIN, that's
expected. Since `multi_update::prepare2()` converted
`Item_temptable_rowid` into `Item_field` (28dbdf3)
`multi_update::send_data()` accesses join tmp record directly and
treats it as a normal row ignoring null status of ref field. NULL ref
field is then treated as normal in `multi_update::do_updates()` which
tries to position updated table by reference 0.

Note that reference 0 may be valid reference and the first row of
table can be wrongly updated (see multi_update.test).

Fix

Do not add row into multi-update tmp table in case of null ref
field. Join tmp table does not have null_row status at this time (as
well as `STATUS_NULL_ROW`) and cannot be skipped by these properties
(see first comment in multi_update::send_data()). But it has all null
fields (including the ref field).
2020-04-02 20:48:38 +03:00
Monty
a071e0e029 Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2019-09-03 13:17:32 +03:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
4a3d51c76c Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2019-06-14 07:36:47 +02:00
Oleksandr Byelkin
c51f85f882 Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2019-05-12 17:20:23 +02:00
Sergei Golubchik
28dbdf3d79 MDEV-14551 Can't find record in table on multi-table update with ORDER BY
preserve positions if the multi-update join is using tmp table:

* store positions in the tmp table if needed
  JOIN::add_fields_for_current_rowid()

* take positions from the tmp table, not from file->position():
  multi_update::prepare2()
2018-05-17 15:13:47 +02:00
Michael Widenius
a7abddeffa Create 'main' test directory and move 't' and 'r' there 2018-03-29 13:59:44 +03:00
Renamed from mysql-test/t/multi_update.test (Browse further)