The patch b96c196f1c added a new call for
safe_charset_converter() without a corresponding fix_fields().
In case of a sub-query the created Item remained in non-fixed state.
The problem did not show up with literal derived expressions, only
subselects were affected. This patch adds a corresponding fix_fields()
to the previously added safe_charset_converter().
The select mentioned in the bug attempted to create a temporary table
using the maria storage engine. The table needs to have primary keys such that
duplicates can be removed. Unfortunately this use case has a longer
than allowed key and the tmp table got created without a temporary key.
We must not allow materialization for the subquery if the total key
length and key parts is greater than what the storage engine supports.
Problem was in rewriting left expression which had 2 references on it. Solved with making subselect reference main.
Item_in_optimized can have not Item_in_subselect reference in left part so type casting with no check is dangerous.
Item::cols() should be checked after Item::fix_fields().
Analysis :
==========
During JOIN::prepare of sub-query which creates the
derived tables we call setup_procedure. Here we call
fix_fields for parameters of procedure clause. Calling
setup_procedure at this point may cause issue. If
sub-query is one of parameter being fixed it might
lead to complicated dependencies on derived tables
being prepared.
SOLUTION :
==========
In 5.6 with WL#6242, we have made procedure clause
parameters can only be NUM, so sub-queries are not
allowed as parameters. So in 5.5 we can block
sub-queries in procedure clause parameters.
This eliminates above conflicting dependencies.
Fix by Sergey Petrunia.
This patch only prevents the evaluation of expensive subqueries during optimization.
The crash reported in this bug has been fixed by some other patch.
The fix is to call value->is_null() only when !value->is_expensive(), because is_null()
may trigger evaluation of the Item, which in turn triggers subquery evaluation if the
Item is a subquery.
The problem was that was_null and null_value variables was reset in each reexecution of IN subquery, but engine rerun only for non-constant subqueries.
Fixed checking constant in Item_equal sort.
Fix constant reporting in Item_subselect.
Analysis:
The fix for bug lp:985667 implements the method Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result()
for all main kinds of subqueries. The purpose of this method is to be called from
return_zero_rows() and set Items to some default value in the case when a query
returns no rows. Aggregates and subqueries require special treatment in this case.
Every implementation of Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result() called
Item_subselect::make_const() to set the subquery predicate to its default value
irrespective of where the predicate was located in the query. Once the predicate
was set to a constant it was never executed.
At the same time, the JOIN object of the fake select for UNIONs (the one used for
the final result of the UNION), was set after all subqueries in the union were
executed. Since we set the subquery as constant, it was never executed, and the
corresponding JOIN was never created.
In order to decide whether the result of NOT IN is NULL or FALSE, Item_in_optimizer
needs to check if the subquery result was empty or not. This is where we got the
crash, because subselect_union_engine::no_rows() checks for
unit->fake_select_lex->join->send_records, and the join object was NULL.
Solution:
If a subquery is in the HAVING clause it must be evaluated in order to know its
result, so that we can properly filter the result records. Once subqueries in the
HAVING clause are executed even in the case of no result rows, this specific
crash will be solved, because the UNION will be executed, and its JOIN will be
constructed. Therefore the fix for this crash is to narrow the fix for lp:985667,
and to apply Item_subselect::no_rows_in_result() only when the subquery predicate
is in the SELECT clause.
CHEAP SQ: Valgrind warnings "Memory lost" with IN and EXISTS nested subquery, materialization+semijoin
Analysis:
The memory leak was a result of the interaction of semi-join optimization
with early optimization of constant subqueries. The function:
setup_jtbm_semi_joins() created a dummy temporary table "dummy_table"
in order to make some JOIN_TAB objects complete. Normally, such temporary
tables are freed inside JOIN_TAB::cleanup.
However, the inner-most subquery is pre-optimized, which allows the
optimization fo the MAX subquery to determine that its WHERE is TRUE,
and thus to compute the result of the MAX during optimization. This
ultimately allows the optimize phase of the outer query to find that
it WHERE clause is FALSE. Once JOIN::optimize finds that the result
set is empty, it sets zero_result_cause, and returns *before* it ever
reached make_join_statistics(). As a result the query plan has no
JOIN_TABs at all. Since the temporary table is supposed to be cleanup
via JOIN_TAB::cleanup, this never happens because there is no JOIN_TAB
for this table. Hence we get a memory leak.
Solution:
Whenever there are no JOIN_TABs, iterate over all table reference in
JOIN::join_list, and free the ones that contain semi-join temporary
tables.
